Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T10:54:49.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EFFETS DE LA PHOTOPERIODE ET DES TEMPERATURES MOYENNES DE 15 °C SUR LA FECONDITE ET LA PRODUCTION DES SEXUES CHEZ LE PUCERON DU POIS, ACYRTHOSIPHON PISUM (APHIDIDAE: HOMOPTERA)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

M. L. Sharma
Affiliation:
Département de biologie, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec
J. M. Larrivée
Affiliation:
Département de biologie, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec
L. M. Thériault
Affiliation:
Département de biologie, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec

Abstract

The fecundity of the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) at 15 °C gradually diminishes as we diminish the daily photoperiod, this being maximum at 16 hours of photoperiod (55 ± 10 on variety Lincoln and 74 ± 15 individuals per parent on pea variety Perfection).

At 15 °C sex determination seems to take place between 12 and 14 hours of photoperiod, the critical phase for the change of sex being 13 hours 17 minutes of photoperiod for A. pisum. Maximum male production (57 – 63%) takes place at a photoperiod between 13 hours 4 minutes and 13 hours 36 minutes. A maximum of 90.5% of oviparous females was produced at a photoperiod of 12 hours and 10 minutes.

Résumé

La fécondité du puceron du pois Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) diminue au fur et à mesure que l’on diminue la photopériode journalière, ceci étant maximal à 16 heures de photopériode (55 ± 10 sur la variété Lincoln et de 74 ± 15 sur la variété Perfection du pois) à 15 °C.

Le déterminisme des sexes semble s’effectuer entre les photopériodes de 12 heures et 14 heures, le seuil critique de changement de sexe étant situé à 13 heures et 17 minutes chez A. pisum. Maximum de mâles (57 à 63%) sont produits entre 13 heures 4 minutes et 13 heures 36 minutes. Un maximum de 90.5% de femelles ovipares a été produit à 12 heures 10 minutes de photopériode.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliographiques

Bonnemaison, L. 1951. Contribution à l'étude des facteurs provoquant l'apparition des formes ailées et sexuées chez les Aphidinae. Annls. Epiphyt.: 1380.Google Scholar
Cartier, J. J. 1960. Growth, reproduction and longevity in one biotype of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris). Can. Ent. 92: 762764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crema, R. 1971. Influenza della temperature e del fotoperiodo sulla comparsa di femmine ovipare in Megoura viciae Buckt. Atti dell 'VIII Congr. Naz. Ital di Entomol. Firenze Settembre 1969: 113116.Google Scholar
Dean, G. A. and Smith, R. C.. 1935. Insects injurious to alfalfa in Kansas. Bienen. Rep. Kansas Bd Agric. 29: 202249.Google Scholar
Harrington, C. D. 1941. Influence of aphid resistance in peas upon aphid development, reproduction and longevity. J. Agric. Res. 62: 461466.Google Scholar
Hewitt, E. J. 1963. Nutrition of plants in culture media. 2. Mineral nutrition of plants in culture media, pp. 97133. In Plant physiology, Vol. III, Editor Steward, F. C.. Academic Press, New York, 811 pp.Google Scholar
Lamb, R. J. and Pointing, P. J.. 1972. Sexual morph determination in the aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum. J. Insect Physiol. 18: 20292042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lees, A. D. 1959. The role of photoperiod and temperature in the determination of parthenogenetic and sexual forms in the aphid Megoura viciae Buckton. I. The influence of these factors on apterous virginoparae and their progeny. J. Insect Physiol. 3: 92117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lees, A. D. 1963. The role of photoperiod and temperature in the determination of parthenogenetic and sexual forms in the aphid Megoura viciae Buckton. III. Further properties of maternal switching mechanism in apterous aphids. J. Insect Physiol. 9: 153164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacGillivray, M. E. and Anderson, G. B.. 1964. The effect of photoperiod and temperature on the production of gamic and agamic forms in Macrosiphum euphorbiae (Thomas). Can. J. Zool. 42: 491510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maltais, J. B. and Auclair, J. L.. 1957. Factors in resistance of peas to the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris. I. The sugar nitrogen ratio. Can. Ent. 89: 365370.Google Scholar
Markkula, M. 1963. Studies on the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris (Hom; Aphididae), with special reference to the differences in the biology of the green and red forms. Ann. agric. fenn. 2(7): 130.Google Scholar
Markkula, M. and Roukka, K.. 1971. Resistance of plants to the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris (Hom; Aphididae). Ann. agric. fenn. 10: 3337.Google Scholar
Müller, F. P. 1962. Biotypen und Unterarten der “Erbsenlaus” Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris. Z. scher. Pfl. Krankh. 69: 129136.Google Scholar
Sharma, M. L., Larrivee, J. M. et Theriault, L. M.. 1972. Etude des conditions particulières régissant la formation des mâles chez le puceron du pois Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris). Annls Soc. ent. Québ. 17: 133137.Google Scholar