Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-2l2gl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T19:56:56.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

THE DURRA STEM BORER Sesamia cretica Led. A NEW PROBLEM IN IMPORTED EUROPEAN BROOM CORNx

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

H. A. U. Monro
Affiliation:
Fumigation Laboratory, Division of Plant Protection, Montreal, P. Q.

Extract

Importations into North America of shipments of broom corn (Sorghum vugare var. technicum) have always been a source of anxiety to plant quarantine officials. It is well known that the European corn borer, Pyrausta nubilalis Hbn., was almost certainly introduced onto this continent in this commodity (22), a surmise which receives perennial support from the continued finding of this species in consignments from various parts of Europe. Broom corn is usually imported in bales weighing from 100 to 250 pounds each, (Figures 1 and 2) which contain both the brush and anything up to 12 inches of stalk necessary for the proper binding of the broom. It is interesting to note that in the country of origin, after the broom corn is harvested, it is dried and curcd and is then usually subected to the fumes of burning sulphur overnight in a closed room in order to bring about, through bleaching, a uniform yellowish colour desired in the trade. None of these treatments have any appreciable effect on the populations of living borers found in the stalks. In addition to insect pests which feed in or on broom corn as a normal host, other species may use the borings of the normal pests as sites of hibernation or pupation. Under some conditions, no doubt, stalks may be left lying in the field for some time prior to harvesting, and thus constitute a refuge for many potential pests.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1947

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Andres, A. Note sur un nouveau ravageur du Mais. Bull. Soc. Ent. d'Egypte, Cairo, pt. 1: 2022. 1913. Rev. App. Ent. (A). 12: 501, 1913.Google Scholar
2. Bedford, H. W.Rep. Agric. Res. Serv. Sudan 19361937, pp. 5065, 1937. Rev. App. Ent. (A), 27: 574, 1939.Google Scholar
3. Bellemare, E. R.Methyl Bromide, a Method of Application. Pests 10 (12): 17, 1942.Google Scholar
4. Boursin, Ch.Le Sesamia cretica, Led., en France. Rev. Française de Lépidoptérolagie, 10: 124, 1944Google Scholar
5. Chorbadzhiev, P. Data on Injurious Insects and other Enemies of cultivated Plants in Bulgaria. Mitt. Bulg. Ent. Ges. 9: 151170, Sofia, 1936. Rev. App. Ent. (A), 25: 313, 1937.Google Scholar
6. Cuscianna, N. The Maize Noctuid, Sesamia cretica Led., in the Province of Trieste. Boll. Lab. Ent. Bologna, 7: 241262, 1935. Rev. App. Ent. (A), 23: 520–521. 1935.Google Scholar
7. Dudgeon, G. C. Egyptian Agricultural Products. Sorghum vulgare, Pers., etc. Ministry or Agric., Kgypt, Cairo, no. la, 1915. Rev. App. Eur. (A), 4: 254–255, 1916.Google Scholar
8. Dutt, A. Iraq Admin. Egypt. Dept. Agric. pp. 6163, Baghdad, 1922. Rev. App. Ent. (A), 11: 29, 1923.Google Scholar
9. Hase, A. Observations on the Corn Borer in Spain. Internat. Corn Borer Invest. Sci. Rep. 19271928, pp. 143147Chicago Ill., 1928. Rev. App. Ent. (A), 17: 217, 1929.Google Scholar
10. Hergula, B. The Corn Borer Situation in Southern Yugoslavia. Internat. Corn Borer Invest. Sci. Rep. 1930, pp. 121129. Rev. App. Ent. (A), 19: 154, 1931.Google Scholar
11. Kendrew, W. G.The Climates of the Continents. Clarendon Press, Oxford, p. 29, 1927.Google Scholar
12. Malenotti, E. Observations in 1968 on Pyrausta nubilalis and Sesamia cretica infesting Sugar Sorghum and Maize in Italy. Industr. saccar. ital. 31: 14, Genoa, 1938. Rev. App. Ent. (A), 27: 295–296, 1939.Google Scholar
13. Martelli, M. Contributions to the Knowledge of the Insect Fauna of Maize. I. Preliminary Note. Boll. Inst. Ent. Bologna, 10: 139166, 1938. Rev. App. Ent. (A), 27: 174, 1939.Google Scholar
14. Mendes, C. The principal Lepidoptera injurious to Agriculture in the neighbourhood of S. Fiel, Beixa, Portugal. Broteria, Salamanca, Ser. Zool., 11: 4044, 1913. Rev. App. Ent. (A), 1: 313. 1913.Google Scholar
15. Menozzi, C. Observations on Insect PestS of Sugar-beet and their Control during the Suger-beet Season in 1937. Industr, saccar. ital. 31: 8Genoa, 1938. Rev. Ent. (A), 26: 527–528, 1938.Google Scholar
16. Monro, H. A. U.Low Temperature Fumigation. Can. Ent. 77: 192196, 1945.Google Scholar
17. Monro, H. A. U. and DeLisle, R.Further Application of Methyl Bromide as a Fumigant. Sci. Agr. 23: 9, pp. 546556, 1943.Google Scholar
18. Monro, H. A. U. and DeLisle, R.Methyli Bromido Fumigation of Plant Products in Railroad Freight Cars. Sci. Agr. 25: 794816, 1945.Google Scholar
19. Noeli, P. Les ennemis du Maïs, Bull. Lab. Reg. Entom. Agric. Rouen, pp. 610, 1917. Rev. App. Ent. (A), 5:159,, 1917.Google Scholar
20. Rocci, U. and Turati, E.Sesamia cretica Led (Lepid. Noct.) T. c., pp. 192193, 1933. Rev. App. Ent (A) 21: 642, 1933.Google Scholar
21. Seitz, A.Macrolepidoptera of the World. 3: 240Stuttgart, 1914Google Scholar
22. Smith, H. E.Broom Corn, The Probable Host in which Pyrausta nubilalis Hbn., reached America. Jour. Econ. Ent. 13 (5): 317320, 1920.Google Scholar