Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T19:10:05.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Are bumble bee colonies in tomato greenhouses obtaining adequate nutrition?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2012

Robin Whittington*
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada, V5A 1S6
Mark L. Winston
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada, V5A 1S6
*
1 Corresponding author (email: rwhittib@sfu.ca).

Abstract

Managed bumble bees are important pollinators of greenhouse crops, but few studies have examined factors that affect the health and productivity of commercially produced colonies. We investigated whether supplemental feeding with diverse pollens affected worker longevity and colony size of Bombus occidentalis Greene (Hymenoptera: Apidae) colonies in tomato (Solanaceae) greenhouses. We found no differences in colony worker populations, brood production, or queen and drone production between supplemented and nonsupplemented treatments, suggesting that B. occidentalis colonies obtain adequate nutrition from the tomato pollen available in greenhouses. Adult populations did not increase in any treatment, but either remained stable or declined after colonies were placed in greenhouses. Because brood-rearing increased in all treatments but adult populations did not, adult mortality due to a non-nutritional factor such as disease or disorientation appears to be an important problem limiting the size of bumble bee colonies, and thus the effectiveness of bumble bees for greenhouse tomato pollination.

Résumé

Les bourdons d'élevage sont d'importants pollinisateurs des cultures de serre, mais peu d'études se sont intéressées aux facteurs qui affectent la santé et la productivité des colonies produites commercialement. Nous examinons si l'addition de divers pollens affecte la longévité des ouvrières et la taille de la colonie de Bombus occidentalis Greene (Hymenoptera : Apidae) dans des serres de tomates (Solanaceae). Il n'y a pas de différence entre les populations d'ouvrières, la production des couvains et la production des reines et des mâles des colonies alimentées de suppléments de pollen et de celles qui ne le sont pas, ce qui fait croire que les colonies de B. occidentalis obtiennent une alimentation adéquate dans le pollen de tomates disponible dans les serres. Les populations adultes ne s'accroissent dans aucun de traitements : elles demeurent stables ou déclinent après que les colonies sont placées dans les serres. Puisque le couvain augmente dans tous les traitements, mais non les populations adultes, la mortalité des adultes due à une cause non alimentaire, telle que la maladie ou la désorientation, semble être un facteur important qui limite la taille des colonies de bourdons et, par conséquent, l'efficacité des bourdons comme pollinisateurs des tomates en serre.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, D.L., Giacon, H. 1992. Reduced pollen collection by honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) colonies infected with Nosema apis and sacbrood virus. Journal of Economic Entomology 85: 4751Google Scholar
Banda, H.J., Paxton, R.J. 1991. Pollination of greenhouse tomatoes by bees. Acta Horticulturae 288: 194–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartar, R.V. 1992. Adjustment of foraging effort and task switching in energy-manipulated wild bumble bee colonies. Animal Behaviour 44: 7587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Groot, A.P. 1953. Protein and amino acid requirements of the honey bee (Apis mellifica L.). Physiologia Comparata et Oecologia 3: 197285Google Scholar
Dogterom, M.H., Matteoni, J.A., Plowright, R.C. 1998. Pollination of greenhouse tomatoes by the North American Bombus vosnesenskii (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 91: 71–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duchateau, M.J., Velthuis, H.H.W. 1988. Development and reproductive strategies in Bombus terrestris colonies. Behaviour 107: 186207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fewell, J.H., Winston, M.L. 1992. Colony state and regulation of pollen foraging in the honey bee Apis mellifera L. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 30: 387–93Google Scholar
Garófalo, C.A. 1978. Bionomics of Bombus (Fervidobombus) morio. 2. Body size and length of life of workers. Journal of Apicultural Research 17: 130–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldblatt, J.W., Fell, R.D. 1987. Adult longevity of workers of the bumble bees Bombus fervidus (F.) and Bombus pennsylvanicus (De Geer) (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 65: 2349–53Google Scholar
Janmaat, A.F., Winston, M.L., 2000. Condition-dependent response to changes in pollen stores in honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies with different parasitic loads. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 47: 171–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kevan, P.G., Straver, W.A., Offer, M., Laverty, T.M. 1991. Pollination of greenhouse tomatoes by bumble bees in Ontario. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Ontario 122: 15–9Google Scholar
Levin, M.D., Haydak, M.H. 1957. The comparative value of different pollens in the nutrition of Osmia lignaria. Bee World 38: 221–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picken, A.J.F. 1984. A review of pollination and fruit set in the tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Journal of Horticultural Science 59: 113Google Scholar
Plowright, R.C., Jay, S.C. 1966. Rearing bumble bee colonies in captivity. Journal of Apicultural Research 5: 155–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plowright, R.C., Thomson, J.D., Lefkovitch, L.P., Plowright, C.M.S. 1993. An experimental study of the effect of colony resource level manipulation on foraging for pollen by worker bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 71: 1393–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pressman, E., Shaked, R., Rosenfeld, K., Hefetz, A. 1999. A comparative study of the efficiency of bumble bees and an electric bee in pollinating unheated greenhouse tomatoes. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 74: 101–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodd, F.H., Plowright, R.C., Owen, R.E. 1980. Mortality rates of adult bumble bee workers (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 58: 1718–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roulston, T.H., Cane, J.H., Buchmann, S.L. 2000. What governs protein content of pollen: pollinator preferences, pollen–pistil interactions, or phylogeny? Ecological Monographs 70: 617–43Google Scholar
SAS Inc. 2000. JMP IN 4.0.3. Cary, North Carolina: SAS Institute IncGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, J.O., Thoenes, S.C., Levin, M.D. 1987. Survival of honey bees, Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae), fed various pollen sources. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 80: 176–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SPSS Inc. 1999. SPSS version 10.0 for Windows. Chicago, Illinois: SPSS IncGoogle Scholar
Straver, W.A., Plowright, R.C. 1991. Pollination of greenhouse tomatoes by bumblebees. Greenhouse Canada February: 1012Google Scholar
Sutcliffe, G.H., Plowright, R.C. 1988. The effects of food supply on adult size in the bumble bee Bombus terricola Kirby (Hymenoptera: Apidae). The Canadian Entomologist 120: 1051–8Google Scholar
Sutcliffe, G.H., Plowright, R.C. 1990. The effects of pollen availability on development time in the bumble bee Bombus terricola K. (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 68: 1120–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Heemert, C., de Ruuijter, A., van den Eijnde, J., van der Steen, J. 1990. Year-round production of bumble bee colonies for crop pollination. Bee World 71: 54–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Koot, Y., van Ravestijn, W. 1962. The germination of tomato pollen on the stigma. pp 452–61 in Proceedings of the 16th International Horticultural Congress. Brussels, Belgium: International Horticultural CongressGoogle Scholar
van Ravestijn, W., van der Sande, J. 1991. Use of bumble bees for the pollination of glasshouse tomatoes. Acta Horticulturae 288: 204–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar