Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-22T04:01:22.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Public Understanding of Neural Prosthetics in Germany: Ethical, Social, and Cultural Challenges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2011

KATSIARYNA LARYIONAVA  and
DOMINIK GROSS
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Since the development of the first neural prosthesis, that is, the cochlear implant in 1957, neural prosthetics have been one of the highly promising, yet most challenging areas of medicine, while having become a clinically accepted form of invasiveness into the human body. Neural prosthetic devices, of which at least one part is inserted into the body, interact directly with the nervous system to restore or replace lost or damaged sensory, motor, or cognitive functions. This field is not homogenous and encompasses a variety of technologies, which are in various stages of development. Some devices are well established in clinical practice and have become routine, such as cochlear implants. By comparison, other technologies are in experimental phases and still need to be further developed to achieve the desired results.

Type
Special Section: Bioethics beyond Borders 2011
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , July 2011 , pp. 434 - 439
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Nsanze, F. ICT implants in the human body: A review. In: The ethical aspects of ICT implants in the human body. Proceedings of the Roundtable Debate. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2005:49–58; available athttp://ec.europa.eu/european_group_ethics/publications/docs/tb21dec_ict_en.pdf (last accessed 15 Jun 2010).Google Scholar

2. Decker, M, Fleischer, T.Contacting the brain—Aspects of a technology assessment of neural implants. Biotechnology Journal 2008;12(3):1502–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3. Racine, E, Gareau, I, Doucet, H, Jobin, G, Laudy, D, Jobin, G, Schraedley-Desmond, P.Hyped biomedical science or uncritical reporting? Press coverage of genomics (1992–2001) in Québec. Social Science & Medicine 2006;62(5):1278–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Racine, E, Bar-Ilan, O, Illes, J.Brain imaging: A decade of coverage in the print media. Science Communication 2006;28(1):122–43CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Racine, E, Waldman, S, Palmour, N, Risse, D, Illes, J. “Currents of hope”: Neurostimulation techniques in U.S. and U.K. print media. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2007;16:312–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Einsiedel, EF.Framing science and technology in the Canadian Press. Public Understanding of Science 1992;1(1):89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4. Baron, U.Befreit von der Last des Körpers [Freed from the burdens of body]. Die Welt 1999 Jun 24; available athttp://www.welt.de/print-welt/article574828/Befreit_von_der_Last_des_Koerpers.html (last accessed 15 Jun 2010).Google Scholar

5. Kutter, S.Hirnschrittmacher Parkinson-Implantat könnte auch andere Leiden lindern. [A brain pacemaker implant for Parkinson's could also relieve other sufferings]. Wirtschaftswoche] 2006 Sep 20; available athttp://www.wiwo.de/technik-wissen/parkinson-implantat-koennte-auch-andere-leiden-lindern-155500/ (last accessed 15 Jun 2010).Google Scholar

6. Quassowsky, K. Mich steuert ein Hirnschrittmacher. [A brain pacemaker controls me]. Bild 2006 Dec 2; available athttp://www.bild.de/BTO/tipps-trends/gesund-fit/bams/2006/10/29/hirnschrittmacher/hirnschrittmacher.html (last accessed 15 May 2010).Google Scholar

7. Fiedeler, U.Stand der Technik neuronaler Implantate [Neural implants: A state of the art report]. Wissenschaftliche Berichte FZKA, 7387. Karlsruhe: Forschungszentrum; 2008:92.Google Scholar