Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T17:05:29.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mental Retardation: The Reality Behind the Label

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2009

Henry J. Bourguignon
Henry J. Bourguignon
Affiliation:
Professor of Law at the University of Toledo College of Law
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I'd like to say a few things about the quality of life of people like me. We can have – and now I do have – a good quality of life, but we still have to fight for it. We have to take back control of our lives from the KEEPERS, from the professionals.

Type
Special Section: Ethical Decision Making and Persons with Mental Retardation
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , Spring 1994 , pp. 179 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Martinez, C. A dream for myself. In: Schalock, R, ed. Quality of Life Perspectives and Issues. Washington, D.C.: American Association on Mental Retardation, 1990:3–4 (reproduced with permission).Google Scholar

2. Scheerenberger, RC. A History of Mental Retardation. Baltimore: P.H. Brookes Company, 1983:34–57.Google Scholar

3. Dix, DL. Memorial to the Legislature of Massachusetts (1843). In: Rosen, M, Clark, GR, Kivitz, MS, eds. The History of Mental Retardation: Collected Papers. Baltimore: University Park Press, Vol. 1. 1976:3, 6–7.Google Scholar

4. See note 2. Scheerenberger, . 1983:101–15.Google Scholar A leading writer on the subject found the causes of retardation in moral failures such as drunkenness, masturbation, and incest. See also Howe, SG. On the causes of idiocy (1848).Google Scholar In: Rosen, M et al. , eds. The History of Mental Retardation: Collected Papers. Vol. 1. 1976:31, 34.Google Scholar

The moral to be drawn from the existence of the individual idiot is this, –he, or his parents, have so far violated the natural laws, so far marred the beautiful organism of the body, that it is an unfit instrument for the manifestation of the powers of the soul.

5. Higham, J. Strangers in the Land. 1965:44.Google Scholar See also note 2. Scheerenberger, . 1983:116–8.Google Scholar

6. See note 2. Scheerenberger, . 1983:110–29.Google Scholar

7. Kerlin, IN. The Mind Unveiled: Or, a Brief History of Twenty-two Imbecile Children. Philadelphia: Hunt, 1858:13.Google Scholar

8. Dugdale, RL. Hereditary pauperism as illustrated in the “Juke” family (1877). In: Rosen, M, Clark, GR, Kivitz, MS, eds. The History of Mental Retardation: Collected Papers. Baltimore: University Park Press, Vol. 1. 1976:269, 271–3.Google Scholar

9. Gould, SJ. The Mismeasure of Man. New York: Norton, 1981:152–64.Google Scholar

10. Goddard, HH. Four hundred feeble-minded children classified by the Binet method (1910). In: Rosen, M, Clark, GR, Kivitz, MS, eds. The History of Mental Retardation: Collected Papers. Baltimore: University Park Press, Vol. 1. 1976:355, 363–5.Google Scholar

11. Goddard, HH. The Kallikak Family: A Study in the Heredity of Feeble-mindedness. New York: MacMillan, 1913:18. The status of the remaining Kallikaks was unknown or doubtful.Google Scholar

12. See note 11. Goddard, . 1913:103–17.Google Scholar

13. See note 11. Goddard, . 1913:116.Google Scholar Modern critics accuse Goddard of distorting the facts about the Kallikak family to confirm his thesis on the hereditary nature of mental retardation. Smith, JD. Minds Made Feeble: The Myth and Legacy of the Kallikaks. Rockville, Maryland: Aspen Systems Corporation. 1985:83–113.Google Scholar

14. See note 9. Gould, . 1981:163.Google Scholar

15. See note 5. Higham, . 1965:150–1.Google Scholar See also note 9. Gould, . 1981:75–7.Google Scholar

16. Schwartz, K. Nature's corrective principle in social evolution (1908). In Rosen, M, Clark, GR, Kivitz, MS, eds. The History of Mental Retardation: Collected Papers. Baltimore: University Park Press, Vol. 2. 1976:147, 149–58.Google ScholarCynkar, RJ. Buck v. Bell: “felt necessities” v. fundamental values? Columbia Law Review 1981;81:1418, 1422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17. Haller, MH. Eugenics: Hereditarian Attitudes in American Thought. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press, 1963:101.Google Scholar

18. See note 17. Haller, . 1963:113–4.Google Scholar See also note 9. Gould, . 1981:192–9.Google ScholarRobert, M. Yerkes, the Harvard faculty member primarily responsible for the mental testing of army recruits, used his supposedly scientific data on some 1.75 million men to further the cause of eugenics and the restriction of immigration from southern and eastern Europe.Google Scholar

19. See note 16. Cynkar, . 1981;81:1429.Google Scholar

20. See note 2. Scheerenberger, . 1983:156Google Scholar (citing Best, H., Public Provisions for the Mentally Retarded in the United States [1965]).Google Scholar

21. See note 2. Scheerenberger, . 1983:154–6.Google Scholar See also note 16. Cynkar, . 1981;81:1429.Google Scholar

22. Whitney, EA, Shick, MM. Some results of selective sterilization (1931). In: Rosen, M, Clark, GR, Kivitz, MS, eds. The History of Mental Retardation: Collected Papers. Baltimore: University Park Press, Vol. 2. 1976:201, 204.Google Scholar

23. Reilly, PR. The Surgical Solution-A History of Involuntary Sterilization in the United States. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991:2.Google Scholar

24. Estacio, RA. Comment. Sterilization of the mentally disabled in Pennsylvania: three generations without legislative guidance are enough. Dickinson Law Review 1988;92:409, 412.Google Scholar

25. See note 16. Cynkar, . 1981;81:1433.Google Scholar

26. See note 16. Cynkar, . 1981;81:1434.Google Scholar See also note 23. Reilly, . 1991:40.Google Scholar

27. Lombardo, PA. Three generations, no imbeciles: new light on Buck v. Bell. New York University Law Review 1985;60:30, 34–48.Google Scholar

28. Buck v. Bell. 274 U.S. 200 (1942).Google Scholar

29. See note 27. Lombardo, . 1985;60:52–3.Google Scholar

30. See note 27. Lombardo, . 1985;60:48–58.Google Scholar

31. Buck v. Bell. 274 U.S. at 207. See also Dudziak, ML. Oliver Wendell Holmes as a eugenic reformer: rhetoric in the writing of constitutional law. Iowa Law Review 1986;71:833.Google Scholar

32. See note 17. Haller, . 1963:42.Google Scholar

33. Lifton, RJ. The Nazi Doctors: Medical Killing and the Psychology of Genocide. New York: Basic Books, 1986:46–7.Google Scholar

34. Muller, I. Hitler's Justice: The Courts of the Third Reich. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1991:120–6.Google Scholar

35. See note 33. Lifton, . 1986:48–52.Google Scholar

36. See note 33. Lifton, . 1986:52–6, 76.Google Scholar

37. See note 33. Lifton, . 1986:62–79.Google Scholar See also note 17. Haller, . 1963:180.Google Scholar

38. See note 17. Haller, . 1963:177–80.Google Scholar

39. Scheerenberger, RC. A History of Mental Retardation: A Quarter Century of Promise. Baltimore, Maryland: P.H. Brookes Company, 1987:109.Google Scholar

40. See note 39. Scheerenberger, . 1987:37–66.Google ScholarGrossman, HJ. Classification in Mental Retardation. Washington, D.C.: American Association on Mental Deficiency, 1983:123–54.Google Scholar

41. In re Cavitt. 157 N.W.2d 171, 177 (Neb. 1968).Google Scholar

42. See note 39. Scheerenberger, . 1987:116–23, 149–72, 195–9.Google Scholar

43. Education of the Handicapped Act, Pub. L. No. 94–142, 89 Stat. 773, 20 U.S.C. §1401–20, §1401(a) (1988).

44. Herr, SS. The new clients: legal services for mentally retarded persons. Stanford Law Review 1979;31:553, 565–7. The shocking conditions at Willowbrook State School in New York, Pennhurst State School & Hospital in Pennsylvania, Northampton State Hospital in Massachusetts, and Partlow State School in Alabama have been documented in well-publicized judicial decisions.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

45. Wolfensberger, W. Will there always be an institution? I. The impact of epidemiological trends (1971). In: Rosen, M, Clark, GR, Kivitz, MS, eds. The History of Mental Retardation: Collected Papers. Baltimore: University Park Press, Vol. 2. 1976:401–2.Google Scholar

46. Wald, PM. Principal paper for basic personal and civil rights. In: Kindred, M., ed. The Mentally Retarded Citizen and the Law. Sponsored by the President's Committee on Mental Retardation. 1976:3, 5.Google Scholar

47. Jacobs, J. Mental Retardation: A Phenomenological Approach. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas, 1980:39–40.Google Scholar

48. McCullough, LB. The world gained and the world lost: labeling the mentally retarded. In: Kopelman, L, Moskop, JC, eds. Ethics and Mental Retardation. Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1984:99, 109.Google Scholar

49. Levitas, A, Gilson, SE Psychodynamic psychotherapy with mildly and moderately retarded patients. In: Fletcher, RJ, Menolascino, FJ, eds. Mental Retardation and Mental Illness: Assessment, Treatment, and Service for the Dually Diagnosed. Lexington, Massachusetts: Lexington Books, 1989:71.Google Scholar

50. Mundy, P, Kasari, C. The similar-structure hypothesis and differential rate of development in mental retardation. In: Hodapp, RM, Burack, JA, Zigler, E, eds. Issues in the Developmental Approach to Mental Retardation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990:71, 79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarWeisz, JR. Cultural-familial mental retardation: a developmental perspective on cognitive performance and ‘helpless’ behavior. In: Hodapp, RM, Burack, JA, Zigler, E, eds. Issues in the Developmental Approach to Mental Retar Reality Behind the Labeldation. 1990:155–8.Google ScholarMacklin, R, Gaylin, W. Mental Retardation and Sterilization: A Problem of Competency and Paternalism. New York: Plenum Press, 1981:49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

51. Edgerton, RB. Perspectives on the prevention of mild mental retardation. In: Menolascino, FJ, Stark, JA, eds. Preventive and Curative Intervention in Mental Retardation. Baltimore, Maryland: P.H. Brookes Company, 1988:333–4.Google Scholar

52. Koegel, P, Edgerton, RB. Black “six-hour retarded children” as young adults. In: Edgerton, RB, ed. Lives in Process: Mildly Retarded Adults in a Large City. Washington, D.C.: American Association on Mental Deficiency, 1984:145, 170.Google Scholar

53. Edgerton, RB. The Cloak of Competence: Stigma in the Lives of the Mentally Retarded. Berkeley, California: University of California Press, 1967:216.Google Scholar

54. Kernan, KT, Sabsay, S. Getting there: directions given by mildly retarded and nonretarded adults. In: Edgerton, RB, ed. Lives in Process: Mildly Retarded Adults in a Large City. Washington, D.C.: American Association on Mental Deficiency, 1984:27, 39–40.Google Scholar

55. See note 50. Macklin, Gaylin. 1981:60–1.Google Scholar

56. Kaufman, S. Friendship, coping systems and community adjustment of mildly retarded adults. In: Edgerton, RB, ed. Lives in Process: Mildly Retarded Adults in a Large City. Washington, D.C.: American Association on Mental Deficiency, 1984:73, 83–90.Google Scholar

57. See note 50. Weisz, . 1990:158–64.Google Scholar

58. Bogdan, R, Taylor, SJ. Relationships with severely disabled people: the social construction of humanness. Social Problems 1989;36:135, 139–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

59. Kuntz, JB, Carrier, JK, Mollis, JH. A nonvocal system for teaching retarded children to read and write. In: Meyers, CE, ed. Quality of Life in Severely and Profoundly Mentally Retarded People: Research Foundations for Improvement. Washington, D.C.: American Association on Mental Deficiency, 1978:145, 148–9, 183–90.Google Scholar

60. See note 51. Edgerton, . 1988:334.Google Scholar

61. Kernan, KT, Koegal, P. Employment experiences of community-based mildly retarded adults. In: Edgerton, RB, ed. Lives in Process: Mildly Retarded Adults in a Large City. Washington, D.C.: American Association on Mental Deficiency, 1984:9, 25.Google Scholar

62. Turner, JL et al. , Speech etiquette in a sheltered workshop. In: Edgerton, RB, ed. Lives in Process: Mildly Retarded Adults in a Large City. Washington, D.C.: American Association on Mental Deficiency, 1984:43–70.Google Scholar

63. Karan, OC et al. , Persons in transition. In: Schalock, R, ed. Quality of Life Perspectives and Issues. Washington, D.C.: American Association on Mental Retardation, 1990:85, 89–90.Google ScholarEdgerton, RB. Quality of life from a longitudinal research perspective. In: Schalock, R, ed. Quality of Life Perspectives and Issues. 1990:149, 158.Google Scholar

64. Hayman, RL Jr. Presumptions of justice: law, politics, and the mentally retarded parent. Harvard Law Review 1990; 103:1201, 1216–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

65. Becker, E. The Denial of Death. New York: Free Press, 1973.Google Scholar

66. Thurm, A. Mental handicap nursing: “I've lost a good friend.” Nursing Times 1989;85:66, 68.Google ScholarBihm, EM, Elliott, LS. Conceptions of death in mentally retarded persons. Journal of Psychology 1982; 111:205, 210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

67. See note 62. Turner, et al. 1984:49–54.Google Scholar

68. McLoughlin, IJ. Bereavement in the mentally handicapped. British Journal of Hospital Medicine 1986;36:256, 258.Google ScholarPubMed

69. See note 50. Macklin, Gaylin. 1981:57.Google Scholar

70. See note 40. Grossman, . 1983:1. For a period of time the A AMR called itself the American Association of Mental Deficiency (AAMD), but I will use the more traditional and the current title as in the text.Google Scholar

71. American Association on Mental Retardation (AAMR). Mental Retardation: Definition, Classification, and Systems of Supports. 9th ed.Washington, D.C.: AAMR: 1992:5.Google Scholar

72. Kopelman, L. Respect and the retarded: issues of valuing and labeling. In: Kopelman, L, Moskop, JC, eds. Ethics and Mental Retardation. Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1984:65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

73. See note 71. AAMR. 1992:69–72.Google Scholar See also note 51. Edgerton, . 1988:325.Google ScholarHodapp, RM, Burack, JA, Zigler, E, The developmental perspective in the field of mental retardation. In: Hodapp, RM et al. , eds. Issues in the Developmental Approach to Mental Retardation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990:3, 13–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

74. See note 40. Grossman, . 1983:11.Google Scholar

75. Burack, JA. Differentiating mental retardation: the two-group approach and beyond. In: Hodapp, RM, Burack, JA, Zigler, E, eds. Issues in the Developmental Approach to Mental Retardation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990:27–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

76. Evans, B, Waites, B. IQ and Mental Testing: An Unnatural Science and Its Social History. Atlantic Highlands, New Jersey: Humanities Press, 1981:120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

77. See note 76. Evans, Waites. 1981:119–44.Google Scholar See also note 9. Gould, . 1981:234–323.Google Scholar

78. Berger, M, Yule, W. IQ tests and assessment. In: Clarke, AM, Clarke, ADB, Berg, JM, eds. Mental Deficiency: The Changing Outlook. New York: Free Press, 1985:53, 66.Google Scholar

79. Sorgen, MS. The classification process and its consequences. In: Kindred, M, ed. The Mentally Retarded Citizen and the Law. New York: Free Press, 1976:215, 229–31.Google Scholar

80. See note 71. AAMR. 1992:46.Google Scholar

81. See note 40. Grossman, . 1983:1.Google Scholar The AAMR in 1983 defined adaptive behavior “as the effectiveness or degree with which individuals meet the standards of personal independence and social responsibility expected for age and cultural group.” See note 71. AAMR. 1992:15, 40–1. The 1992 AAMR definition of adaptive difficulties discusses both practical intelligence and social intelligence and demands that a person be found deficient in at least two adaptive skills such as communication, self-care, home living, social interactions, community use, self-direction, health and safety, functional academics, leisure, or work.Google Scholar

82. Clarke, AM, Clarke, ADB. Criteria and classification. In: Clarke, AM, Clarke, ADB, Berg, JM, eds. Mental Deficiency: The Changing Outlook. New York: Free Press, 1985:27, 43.Google Scholar

83. Leland, H. Adaptive behavior scales. In: Matson, JL, Mulick, JA, eds. Handbook of Mental Retardation. 2nd ed.New York: Pergamon Press, 1991:211, 214.Google Scholar

84. See note 64. Hayman, . 1990; 103:1201, 1213.Google Scholar

85. Glassner, B. Labeling theory. In: Rosenberg, MM, Stebbins, RA, Turowetz, A, eds. The Sociology of Deviance. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1982:71.Google Scholar

86. See note 53. Edgerton, . 1967:205.Google Scholar

87. See note 62. Turner, et al. 1984:43, 60–3.Google Scholar

88. Zetlin, AG, Turner, JL. Self-perspectives on being handicapped: Stigma and adjustment. In: Edgerton, RB, ed. Lives in Process: Mildly Retarded Adults in a Large City. 1984:93, 99–115.Google Scholar

89. See note 50. Macklin, Gaylin. 1981:39–41.Google Scholar See also note 50. Weisz, . 1990:164.Google Scholar

90. See note 48. McCullough, . 1984:99.Google Scholar