4.National Research Council Committee for the Update of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, 8th ed.Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011.
5.Russell, WMS, Burch, RL. The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique. London, UK: Methuen & Co., Ltd; 1959.
6.Marino, L. The Scala Naturae. In: Bekoff, M, ed. Encyclopedia of Human-Animal Relationships: A Global Exploration of Our Connections with Animals, Volume One. Westport, CT: Greenwood; 2007.
7.Marino, L. Ethical gerrymandering in science. Journal of Animal Ethics2011;1:119–21.
11.Wise, S. Entitling non-human animals to fundamental legal rights on the basis of practical autonomy. In: Turner, J, D’Silva, J, eds. Animals, Ethics and Trade: The Challenge of Animal Sentience. New York, NY: Earthscan; 2005. The Nonhuman Rights Project is working to secure legal rights for some animals recognized in common law because common law is based largely on precedent, and if some other animals can be shown to have practical autonomy then there is a logical argument for legal personhood under the common law for them.
12.Andrews, K. The Animal Mind: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Animal Cognition. New York, NY: Routledge; 2015. Also seeDonaldson, S, Kymlicka, W. Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2011; andBeauchamp, T. The failure of theories of personhood. In: Thomasma, D, Weisstub, D, Hervé, C, eds.Personhood and Health Care. New York, NY: Springer, Dordrecht; 1999.
Recommend this journal
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.