Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T13:35:24.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some observations on plene-writing in Hittite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2009

Gillian R. Haet
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One of the most controversial aspects of Hittite phonology is the question of the significance, if any, of the so-called plene-writing of vowels. Explanations for this practice have been sought in a variety of directions. Some have seen in it the continuation of a tradition inherited from predecessors of the Hittite cuneiform syllabary with perhaps little relevance to the facts of the Hittite language. Others have been more confident in seeing in it a method of representing some real linguistic feature, such as vowel length, while inconsistencies or apparent inconsistencies in its use have led others to the conclusion that it has often no functional significance at all. No full-scale investigation of the phenomenon covering the entire Hittite corpus has yet been carried out, nor is such an attempt practicable here. The present paper has the restricted aim of investigating one particular phenomenon, the occurrence of plene-writing in different syllables in different inflexional forms of the same words, and the material drawn upon is chiefly Old and Middle Hittite, since it seems likely that certain patterns of variation in the use of plene-writing were quite early disturbed by analogical levelling within paradigms, or eliminated by the abandonment of plene-writing in the words in question; nevertheless, I believe that the oldest texts in particular still preserve enough evidence for these patterns to be discernible and that the reasons for them are intelligible in historical terms.

Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , February 1980 , pp. 1 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aro, J. 1954. ‘Abnormal plene writings in Akkadìan texts’, Studia Orientalia, XIX, Part 11. (Societas Orientalis Fennica, Helsinki.)Google Scholar
Beekes, R. S. P. 1973. ‘The proterodynamic perfect’, KZ, LXXXVII, 86–98.Google Scholar
Burrow, T. 1973. The Sanskrit language. (Third ed.) London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Eiehner, H. 1973. ‘Die Etymologie von heth. meḫur.’, MSS 31, pp. 53–107.Google Scholar
Eichner, H. 1975. ‘Die Vorgesehichte des hethitischen Verbalsystems’, in Rix, H. (ed.), Flexion und Wortbildung, 71–103.Google Scholar
Friedrich, J. 1926/1930. Staatsverträge des Hatti-Reiches in hethitischer Sprache. Parts I and II. MVAeG 31.1 and 34.1.Google Scholar
Friedrich, J. 1952. Hethitisches Wōrterbuch. Heidelberg: Carl Winter (HW); Ergänzungsheft 1–3, 1957–66 (HW Erg.)Google Scholar
Friedrich, J. 1960. Hethitisches Elementarbuch I (second edition). Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Friedrich, J., and Kammenhuber, A. 1975–1977. Hethitisches Wörterbuch. (Zweite, vollig neuarbeitete Auflage auf der Grundlage der edierten hethitischen Texte. Lfg. I–II.) Heidelberg: Carl Winter, (HW 2).Google Scholar
Götze, A. 1927. Madduwattaš. MVAeG 32.1. (Reprinted Darmstadt, Wissensehaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1968.)Google Scholar
Götze, A. 1930. Neue Bruchstücke zum grossen Text des Hattušliš und den Paralleltexten. MVAeG 34.2. (NBr).Google Scholar
Houwink ten Cate, P. H. J. 1970. The Records of the Early Hittite Empire (c. 1450–1380 B.C.). Istanbul: Nederlands Historisch-Archaeologisch Instituut in het Nabije Oosten.Google Scholar
Huqq, . ‘Der Vertrag des Šuppiluliumaš mit Huḳḳanāš und den Leuten von Hajaša’, in Friedrich, , Staatsverträge, II, 103–63.Google Scholar
HW and HW Erg. v. Friedrich, .Google Scholar
HW2 v. Friedrich-Kammenhuber, .Google Scholar
IEW v. Pokorny, .Google Scholar
Josephson, F. 1972. The function of the sentence particles in Old and Middle Hittite. (Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, Studia Indoeuropaea Upsaliensia, 2.) Uppsala: Skriv Service AB.Google Scholar
Kammenhuber, A. 1954. ‘Studien zum hethitischen Infinitivsystem, I’, MIO, II, 44–77.Google Scholar
Kammenhuber, A. 1969. Hethitisch, Palaisch, Luwisch und Hieroglyphenluwisch. (Altkleinasiatische Sprachen. Handbuch der Orientalistik, Abt. I, Bd. II, Absch. 1, 2, Lfg. 2). Leiden/Köln: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Košak, S. [1978.] ‘The rulers of the Early Hittite Empire.’ Paper read at the International Conference on the Problems of Ancient Egypt, 28–3009 1978, Ljubljana.Google Scholar
Kronasser, H. 1956. Vergleichende Laut- und Formenlehre des Hethitischen. Heidelberg: Carl Winter. VLFH.Google Scholar
Kronasser, H. 1962–1966. Etymologie der hethitischen Sprache. Bd. 1, Lfg. 1–6. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Labat, R. 1932. L'Akkadien de Boghaz-Kōi. Bordeaux: Librairie Delmas.Google Scholar
Laroche, E. 1970. ‘Études de linguistique anatolienne III: 9 Le directif’, RHA, XXVIII, 22–49.Google Scholar
Lindeman, F. O. 1972. ‘Zu dem sog. “protero-dynamischen” Medium in Indogermanischen’, NTS, XXVI, 65–76.Google Scholar
Macdonell, A. A. 1910. Vedic Grammar. Strassburg. (Reprinted, Varanasi, 1968.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MVAeG. Mitteilungen der Vorderasiatisch-Aegyptischen Gesellschaft. (Leipzig.)Google Scholar
Nagy, G. 1974. ‘Six studies of sacred vocabulary relating to the fireplace’, HSCP, LXXXVIII, 71–106.Google Scholar
NBr. v. Götze, .Google Scholar
Neu, E. 1968. Interpretation der hethitischen mediopassiven Verbalformen. StBoT 6.Google Scholar
Neu, E. 1970. Ein althethitisches Gewitterritual. StBoT 12.Google Scholar
Neu, E. 1974. Der Anitta-Text. StBoT 18.Google Scholar
Oettinger, N. 1976. Die Militärischen Eide der Hethiter. StBoT 22.Google Scholar
Oettinger, N. 1976a. ‘Der Indogermanische Stativ’. MSS 34, pp. 109–50.Google Scholar
Otten, H. 1952. ‘Beiträge zum hethitischen Lexicon’, ZA, NF, XV, 230–6.Google Scholar
Otten, H. 1961. ‘Eine Beschwörung der Unterirdischen aus Boğazköi’, ZA, NF, XXV, 114–57.Google Scholar
Otten, H. 1969. Sprachliche Stellung und Datierung des Madduwatta-Textes. StBoT 11.Google Scholar
Pokorny, J. 1959–1969. Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. 2 vols. Bern: Francke. (IEW.)Google Scholar
Reiner, B. 1964. ‘The phonological interpretation of a sub-system of the Akkadian syllabary’, in Briggs, R. D. and Brinkman, J. A. (ed.), Studies presented to A. Leo Oppenheim, June 7th, 1964, 167–80. (Oriental Institute, University of Chicago.)Google Scholar
Rix, H. (ed.). 1975. Flexion und Wortbildung. (Akten der V. Fachtagen der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft, Regensburg, 9–14 Sept. 1973.) Wiesbaden: Reichart.Google Scholar
Rosenkrantz, B. 1959. ‘Zur hethitischen Orthographie und Lautlehre’, in Festschrift Johannes Friedrich zum 65. Geburtstag am 27 August 1958 gewidmet. Heidelberg: Carl Winter, 412–26.Google Scholar
Schindler, J. 1967. ‘Das idg. Wort für “Erde” und die dentalen Spiranten’, Die Sprache, XIII, 191–205.Google Scholar
Schindler, J. 1975a. ‘A thorny problem’, in Watkins, C. (ed.), Indo-European Studies, II. Also in Die Sprache, XXIII, 1977, 25–35.Google Scholar
Schindler, J. 1975. 'Zum Ablaut der neutralen s-Stamme des Indogermanischen, in Rix, H. (ed.), Flexion und Wortbildung, 259–67.Google Scholar
Schindler, H. 1975b. ‘The ablaut of the Indo-European r/n stems’, in Watkins, C. (ed.), Indo-European Studies, II, 210–23.Google Scholar
von Soden, W. 1952. Grundriss der Akkadischen Grammatik. (Analecta Orientalia, 33.) Roma: Pontifioium Institutum Biblioum.Google Scholar
Starke, F. 1977. Die Funktionen der dimensionalen Kasus und Adverbien im Althethitischen. StBoT 23.Google Scholar
Stefanini, R. 1958. ‘Itt. eshar (=sangue): Problemi formali ed etimologici’, AGI, LXIII, 18–41.Google Scholar
StBoT. Studien zu den Boğazköi-Texten. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1965.Google Scholar
Sturtevant, E. H. 1951. A comparative grammar of the Hittite language. Vol. 1. (Revised ed.) New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
VLFH v. Kronasser, .Google Scholar
Watkins, C. 1969. Indogermanische Grammatik, hrsg. von Jerzy Kurylowioz. Bd. III, 1. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Watkins, C. 1975. ‘Hittite saru, Old Irish serb, Welsh Herw’, Indo-European Studies, II (= Report HARV-LING 02–75), pp. 322–31. (Alternative title: ‘A Hittite-Celtic Etymology’.)Google Scholar
Werner, R. 1967. Hethitische Gerichtsprotokolle. StBoT 4.Google Scholar
Wilhelm, G. 1971. ‘Eine altbabylonische Graphie im Hurro-Akkadischen’, Ugarit-Forschungen, III, 235–9.Google Scholar