Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T01:26:40.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The great Persian famine of 1870–71

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2009

Extract

The great famine of 1870–71 was arguably the most tragic event in the modern economic and social history of Persia. Over wide areas of the country almost no rain fell during the winter of 1869/70, and in the following year only the western and southern provinces were blessed with any precipitation. Many areas did not have a single drop of rain during that two-year period. Khurāsān, Isfahān, Yazd and Fārs were particularly hard hit by the drought. In many areas dry-farming crops were wiped out, and harvests of irrigated crops were also very poor as a result of the severe depletion of surface and sub-surface water. Even the Zāyandeh-rūd, which normally contained a large volume of water, dried up.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 FO60/327, Alison, , Commercial No. 7, July 8, 1870.Google Scholar

2 ibid., Alison to Hammond, Commercial No. 12, July 18, 1870.

3 ibid., Holtzer to Smith, July 6, 1870.

4 ibid., Alison to Pelly, June 19, 1870; ibid., Viceroy of India to Alison, June 22, 1870; ibid., Alison, Tehran, June 28 and 29, 1870.

5 FO60/334, No. 64, Meshed Agent to Alison, No. 64, May 1, 1871; Hasan, Naraqi, Tarilch-e Ejtema'i-ye Kāshān (Tehran, 1340/1962), 264Google Scholar; Goldsmid, F. J., ed., Eastern Persia, an account of the journeys of the Persian Boundary Commission, 1870–71–72 (London, 1876), 96.Google Scholar

6 FO60/327, Thomson to Clarendon, Commercial No. 2, January 20, 1870.

7 FO60/334, Alison to Granville, No. 54, April 29, 1871.

8 FO60/338, Alison to Abbott, Resht, No. 33, November 20, 1871; ibid., Abbott to Granville, Resht, No. 8, December 18, 1871.

9 FO60/336, Baker to Alison, December 1, 1871; ibid., ‘Translation from the Tehran Gazette of the 24th April 1871’, May 3, 1871; Mohammad Taqi Bek Arbab, Tdrlkh-e Dar al-Iman-e Qom (Qom, 1353/1974), 60.

10 Jāberī-ye, Ansāri, Tārīkh-e Isfahān va Rey (Tehran, 1321/1943), 50.Google Scholar

11 ibid., 278; Tārikh-e … Qom, 60; Narāqī, 264; FO60/334, Smith to Alison, May 3, 1871; ibid., ‘Translation from the Tehran Gazette’.

12 Persia during the famine, London, 1873.

13 FO60/334, Meshed Agent to Alison, May 1, 1871; ibid., Smith to Alison, May 3, 1871.

14 Jones, ‘ Tabreez for 1872,’ Parliamentary papers, accounts and papers (hereafter, AP.), 1872, LVIII (c. 637), 1190; ‘Cholera in Persia,’ Persian Gulf administration report (hereafter, PQAR), 1889/90, 17.

15 Tārilch-e Qom, 29; Curzon, G. N., Persia and the Persian Question (London, 1892), I, 268; FO60/334, Smith to Alison, May 3, 1871; Government of India, Gazetteer of Persia, part III (Calcutta, 1885), 311.Google Scholar

16 Goldsmid, 98.

17 Keddie, N. R., ‘The economic history of Iran, 1800–1914’, Iranian Studies, V, 1972, 69Google Scholar; Gilbar, G., ‘Demographic developments in late Qajar Persia, 1870–1906,Asian and African Studies, XI, 19761977, 143–1Google Scholar; John, Piggot, Persia ancient and modern (London, 1874), 117.Google Scholar

18 Ansārī, 50, 278; Tarlkh-e … Qom, 60–61.

19 Jones, ‘ Tabreez for 1872,’ 1190.

20 Goldsmid, 95.

21 Curzon, II, 113.

22 The causes of sedentarization of nomads may be summarized as follows: (1)impoverishment; (2)government-imposed sedentarization policy; (3)the enforced sedentarization of nomads by influential tribal leaders who required newly-reclaimed lands; (4)acquired affluence and the ownership of land.

23 Goldsmid, 98.

24 Ahmad, ‘All Khān-e Vazīrī-ye Kermāni, Joghrāfiyā-ye Kermān (Tehran, 1352/1973), 162.Google Scholar

25 Jones, , ‘Azerbijan for 1872’, AP, 1873, LXV, 968; FO60/334, Smith to Alison, May 3, 1871.Google Scholar

26 Ansārī, 278; Ross, E. C., ‘Trade Report for 1873’, PGAR, 18731874, 11.Google Scholar

27 FO60/334, Smith to Alison, May 3, 1871.

28 G. Lucas, ‘Memorandum on the cultivation and exportation of opium in Persia ’, PGAB, 1874–75, 27, ‘ Persian Gulf for 1874–5 ’, AP, 1876, LXXIV, c 1421, 65.

29 Gilbar, 135; Keddie, 69.

30 Pakdaman, N., ‘Preface to studies on the economic and social history of Iran in the nineteenth century ’, Iranian Studies, xvi, 1983, 131.Google Scholar

31 , C. and Burgess, E., Letters from Persia written by Charles and Edward Burgess, 1828–55, ed. B. Schwarz (New York, 1942), 117Google Scholar; Issawi, C., The economic history of Iran, 1800–1914 (Chicago, 1971), 245.Google Scholar

32 Thomson to Alison, ‘ Tehran for 1863’, AP, 1864, LXI, 2, 3392, 194Google Scholar; Abbott, , ‘Tabreez for 1865’, AP, 1866, LXX, 3729, 476.Google Scholar

33 ‘ Report by Mr. Dickson ’, AP, 1866, LXXII, 3586, 207, 211.

34 Pelly, L., ‘Reports on the Trade of the Persian Gulf, 1870–71’, in J. A. Saldanha, Precis oncommerce and communication in the the Persian Gulf 1801–1905 (Simla, March 26, 1906), 35.Google Scholar

35 Yoshida, M., Eashi no Tabi (A journey to Persia) (Tokyo, 1894), 22–3. Sassoon later went to Bombay, taking up trading and banking activities there. The company he established, D. Sassoon and Co., was active in Persian Gulf trade, particularly in opium trade. It used major dealers in Isfahan, Shiraz and Bushehr as agents. In the latter part of the nineteenth century it figured among the largest foreign trading concerns along with Ziegler and Co. (‘ Sassoon, Albert Abdullah ’, The dictionary of national biography: Ahmad Ashraf, Mawdne'-ye Tarikhi-ye Roshd-e Sarmdyehddri dar Iran: Doureh-ye Qājār (Tehran, 1359/1980), 54.)Google Scholar

36 K. E. Abbott, ‘Notes on the trade, manufactures and productions of various cities of Persia, visited by Mr. Consul Abbott in 1849–50’, in A. Amanat, ed., Cities and trade: Consul Abbott on the economy and society of Iran 1847–1866 (London, 1983), 81, 85, 89; FO60/143, Miller to Palmerstone, August 21, 1848.Google Scholar

37 M. Bamdad, ‘ Haji Mirza Hosayn Khan ’, Tārikh-e Eejdl-e Iran, I (Tehran, 1347/1978), 411; E'temad al-Sal'taneh, Montazam-e Naseri (Tehran, 1300/1882–3), III, 210; FO60/440, W. Baring, ‘ Report on trade and cultivation of opium in Persia ’, September 23, 1881 (hereafter, Baring, 1881).

38 Mohammad Mahdi al-Isfahani, Nesf-e Jdhdn, ed. M. Sotudeh (Tehran, 1342/1963), 125; ‘Abd al-Ghaffar Najm al-Molk, Safar Ndmeh-ye Khuzestdn (Tehran, 1341/1962), 177; E'temad al-Saltaneh, al-Ma'thir wa 'l-athar (Tehran, 1306/1889–90), 105; Mirza Hosayn Khan b. Mohammad Ebrahim Tahvildar-e Isfahan, Joghrdfiyd-ye Isfahan, ed. M. Sotudeh (Tehran, 1342/1963), 92 (hereafter, JE.).

39 FO60/321, Thomson, ‘ Memorandum on Opium of Persia ', Commercial, No. I, May 7, 1869; Dickson,‘ Tehran for 1866 ’, AP, 1867/68, LXVIII (3953-i), 301.

40 Cotton seeds had been used for fodder. Wilson, S. G., Persian life and customs (London, 1896), 272; Goldsmid, 179–80.Google Scholar

41 Taqi Bahrami, Farhang-e Rustd'i (Tehran, 1316–17/1937–39), 300.

42 JE, 55; Neligan, A. R., The opium question, with special reference to Persia (London, 1927), 16. (W. Baring states the yield peijarib to be 1 to 1£ man-e shah (13 to 16£lbs.), but this figure is too high (Baring, 1881, 3).)Google Scholar

43 The calculation is as follows: 1,300 chests (=208,000 lbs. of r aw opium) 208,000 lbs. X 3/2 = 312,000 lbs. of opium juice 312,000 lbs. % 6.55 Ibs./jarib = 47,634 jarib = 4,764 ha.

44 L. Pelly, ‘Extract, paragraphs 1 to 5 from a letter of the Political Resident’, ‘Persian Gulf’, No. 5, 12 May 1866; Precis on commerce and communication in the Persian Gulf, 1801–1905, 30.

45 Thomson to Alison, ‘ Tehran for 1863 ’, AP, 1864, 194; Pelly, ‘ Persian Gulf for 1870 ’, AP, 1871, LI, end. 'F.

46 Goldsmid, 96.

47 FO60/334, Smith to Alison, May 3, 1871.

48 Goldsmid, 96.

49 G., Churchill, Biographical notices of Persian statesmen and notables (Calcutta, 1906), 53. Hoarding and market manipulation by powerful elements were commonplace at the time of other famines as well. For instance, in July 1865 the authorities of Shiraz cornered stocks in the city, releasing them only after prices increased sharply. Riots ensued and continued until the governor was finally removed from office. A consular report of 1885 refers to other cases of market manipulation by grain dealers in Isfahan and Shiraz.Google Scholar

50 Goldsmid, p. 97, n. 1.

51 loc. cit.

52 ibid., 97.

53 ibid., 94.

54 ibid.; J. Talboys Wheeler, Memorandum on Persian affairs (Calcutta, 1871), 108; Herbert, ‘ Report on the Present State of Persia ’, AP, 1866, LXVII (c. 4781), 312.

55 Goldsmid, 94.

56 Ahmad ‘Ali Khan-e Vaziri-ye Kermani, Tanhh.-e Kerman (Tehran, 1340/1961–62), 628, 637.

57 Goldsmid, 96–97.

58 Wills, C. J., In the Land of the Lion and Sun or modern Persia (London, 1891), 252–3.Google Scholar

59 Goldsmid, 96.

60 Nowshirvani, V. F, ‘Aspect of the Commercialization of Agirculture’, Conference paper at Babolsar, Iran, 1978, 14.Google Scholar

61 On the other cases of hoarding and manipulation in the later years, see Floor, W., ‘The creation of the food administration in Iran’, Iranian Studies, xvi, 1983, 199227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar