Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T16:17:38.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Strictly singular and strictly cosingular linear relations and their conjugates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

Teresa Álvarez
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Oviedo, 33007, Oviedo, Spain, e-mail: seco@pinon.ccu.uniovi.es
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this paper various conditions are given under which the strict singularity (respectively, strict cosingularity) of a linear relation implies the strict singularity (respectively, strict cosingularity) of its conjugate.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 2005

References

[1]Aubin, J.P. and Cellina, A., Differential inclusions. Set valued maps and viability theory (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, New York, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Clarke, F.H., Optimization and nonsmooth analysis, Canadian Mathematical Society Series of Monographs and Advanced Texts (J. Wiley and Sons, Toronto, 1983).Google Scholar
[3]Cross, R.W., ‘Properties of some norm related functions of unbounded linear operators’, Math. Z. 199 (1988), 285303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Cross, R.W., ‘Unbounded strictly singular operators’, Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. Indag. Math. 91 (1988), 245248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Cross, R.W., Multivalued linear operators, Monographs and Textbooks in Pure and Applied Mathematics 213 (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1998).Google Scholar
[6]van Dulst, D., ‘On strictly singular operators’, Compositio Math 23 (1971), 169183.Google Scholar
[7]Favini, A. and Yagi, A., ‘Multivalued linear operators and degenerate evolution equations’, Ann. Mat. Pura. Appl. (4) 163 (1993), 353384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Goldberg, S., Unbounded linear operators. Theory and Applications (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1966).Google Scholar
[9]Gromov, M., Partial differential relations (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Kato, T., ‘Perturbation theory for nullity, deficiency, and other quantities of linear operators’, J. Anal. Math. 6 (1958), 273322.Google Scholar
[11]Kuratowski, C., Topology I (Polska Akademia Nauk, Varsovia, 1952).Google Scholar
[12]Labuschagne, L.E., Functions of operators and the classes associated with them, (Ph. D. thesis) (Univ. Cape Town, 1988).Google Scholar
[13]Labuschagne, L.E., ‘Characterisations of partially continuous, strictly cosingular and φ_-type operators’, Glasgow Math. J. 33 (1991), 203212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]von Neumann, J., Functional Operators, II. The Geometry of Orthogonal spaces, Annals of Math. Studies 22 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1950).Google Scholar
[15]Pelczynski, A., ‘On strictly singular and strictly cosingular operators I, II’, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. Ser. Math. Astr. Phys 13 (1965), 3141.Google Scholar
[16]Shannon, G.P., ‘Strictly singular and strictly cosingular operators on topological vector spaces’, Proc. Royal Irish Acad. Sci. Sect. A 73 (1973), 303308.Google Scholar
[17]Whitley, R.J., ‘Strictly singular operators and their conjugates’, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc 113 (1964), 252261.Google Scholar
[18]Wilcox, D., Multivalued semi-Fredholm operators in normed linear spaces, (Ph.D. Thesis) (Univ. Cape Town, 2001).Google Scholar