Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T05:51:26.161Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A remark on an integral inequality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

V. Raghavendra
V. Raghavendra
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Sardar Patel University, Vallabh Vidyanagar, Gujarat 388120, India.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A counter example is constructed to show that an integral inequality established by Sree Hari Rao (Theorem 3.1, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 72 (1979), 545–550) is erroneous.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , April 1981 , pp. 195 - 197
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1981

References

[1]Das, P.C. and Sharma, R.R., “Existence and stability of measure differential equations”, Czechoslovak Math. J. 22 (97) (1972), 145–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Rao, V. Sree Hari, “Integral inequalities of Gronwall type for distributions”, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 72 (1979), 545–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar