Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T18:27:16.359Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Positivity notions for holomorphic line bundles over compact Riemann surfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

Joshua H. Rabinowitz
Joshua H. Rabinowitz
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Illinois at Chicago Circle, Chicago, Illinois 60680, USA.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Since the early 1950's, when Kodaira “discovered” positive line bundles, the notion of positivity has undergone a continuous evolution. This paper is intended as an introduction to the study of positivity notions. More specifically, I consider the simplest case - line bundles over compact Riemann surfaces - and compare five positivity notions for such bundles. The results obtained are certainly not new; they are, in fact, known in much greater generality. However, by restricting to the dimension one case, I am able to make use of Riemann surface techniques to significantly simplify the proofs. In fact, this article should be easily understood by anyone familiar with the contents of Gunning's Lectures on Riemann surfaces.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , February 1981 , pp. 5 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1981

References

[1]Fritzsche, Klaus, “Pseudoconvexity properties of complements of analytic subvarieties”, Math. Ann. 230 (1977), 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Grauert, Hans, “Über Modifikationen und exzeptionelle analytische Mengen”, Math. Ann. 146 (1962), 331–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Grauert, Hans und Riemenschneider, Oswald, “Verschwindungssätze für analytische Kohomologiegruppen auf komplexen Räumen”, Invent. Math. 11 (1970), 263–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Griffiths, Phillip A., “Hermitian differential geometry, Chern classes, and positive vector bundles”, Global analysis, 185–251 (University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, 1969)Google Scholar
[5]Gunning, R.C., Lectures on Riemann surfaces (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1966).Google Scholar
[6]Gunning, Robert C., Rossi, Hugo, Analytic functions of several complex variables (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1965).Google Scholar
[7]Kodaira, K., “On cohomology groups of compact analytic varieties with coefficients in some analytic faisceaux”, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 39 (1953), 865–868.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[8]Kodaira, K., “On a differential-geometric method in the theory of analytic stacks”, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 39 (1953), 1268–1273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[9]Kodaira, K., “On Kähler varieties of restricted type (An intrinsic characterization of algebraic varieties)”, Ann. of Math. (2) 60 (1954), 28–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Morrow, James, Kodaira, Kunihiko, Complex manifolds (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, London, Sydney, 1971).Google Scholar
[11]Nakano, Shigeo, “On complex analytic vector bundles”, J. Math. Soc. Japan 7 (1955), 1–12.Google Scholar
[12]Rabinowitz, Joshua H., “Moišezon spaces and positive coherent sheaves”, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 71 (1978), 237–242.Google Scholar
[13]Rabinowitz, Joshua H., “Positivity notions for coherent sheaves over compact complex spaces”, Invent. Math. (to appear).Google Scholar
[14]Riemenschneider, Oswald, “Characterizing Moišezon spaces by almost positive coherent analytic sheaves”, Math. Z. 123 (1971), 263–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Weil, Andre, Introduction ā lētude des variētēs kähleriennes, nouvelle edition corrigee (Hermann, Paris, 1971).Google Scholar
[16]Wells, R.O. Jr, Differential analysis on complex manifolds (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1973).Google Scholar