No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Perfect maps on convergence spaces
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 April 2009
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
The concept of the perfect map on a convergence space (X, q), where q is a convergence function, is introduced and investigated. Such maps are not assumed to be either continuous or surjective. Some nontrivial examples of well known mappings between topological spaces, nontopological pretopological spaces and nonpseudotopological convergence spaces are shown to be perfect in this new sense. Among the numerous results obtained is a covering property for perfectness and the result that such maps are closed, compact, and for surjections almost-compact. Sufficient conditions are given for a compact (respectively almost-compact) map to be perfect. In the final section, a major result shows that if f: (X, q) → (Y, p) is perfect and g: (X, q) → (Z, s) is weakly-continuous into Hausdorff Z, then (f, g): (X, q) → (Y×Z, p×s) is perfect. This result is given numerous applications.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1979
References
[1]Dickman, R.F. Jr, and Porter, Jack R., “θ-perfect and θ-absolutely closed functions”, Illinois J. Math. 21 (1977), 42–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Herrmann, Robert A., “θ-ridigity and the idempotent θ-closure operator”, Math. Sem. Notes 6 (1978), 217–220.Google Scholar
[3]Hogbe-Nlend, H., Théorie des bornologies et applications (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 213. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Илиадис, С., Фомин, с. [S. Iliadis, S. Fomin], “Метод чентрированкых систем в теории топологических пространств” [The method of centred systems in the theory of topological spaces], Uspehi Mat. Nauk 21 (1966), no. 4, 14–76; English translation: Russian Math. Surveys 21 (1966), no. 4, 37–62.Google ScholarPubMed
[5]Kasahara, Shouro, “Boundedness in convergence spaces”, Proceedings of the University of Nevada, Reno, Conference on Convergence Spaces, 1976, 83–92 (Department of Mathematics, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, 1976).Google Scholar
[6]Kent, D., “Convergence functions and their related topologies”, Fund. Math. 54 (1964), 125–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Kent, D., “On convergence groups and convergence uniformities”, Fund. Math. 60 (1967), 213–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Kent, D. and Richardson, G.D., “Minimal convergence spaces”, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 160 (1971), 487–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Kent, Darrell C. and Richardson, Gary D., “Open and proper maps between convergence spaces”, Czechoslovak Math. J. 23 (98) (1973), 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Kent, D.C. and Richardson, G.D., “The regularity series of a convergence space II”, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 15 (1976), 223–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Rao, C.J.M., “On smallest compactification for convergence spaces”, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 44 (1974), 225–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Richardson, G.D. and Kent, D.C., “The regularity series of a convergence space”, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 13 (1975), 21–44.Google Scholar
[14]Vinod-Kumar, , “On the largest Hausdorff compactification on a Hausdorff convergence space”, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 16 (1977), 189–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Vinod-Kumar, , “Compactification of a convergence space”, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 73 (1979), 256–262.Google Scholar
[16]Whyburn, G.T., “Directed families of sets and closedness of functions”, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 54 (1965), 688–692.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
You have
Access