Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T08:49:35.179Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A trap for Phlebotomine sandflies attracted to rats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

R. H. L. Disney
R. H. L. Disney
Affiliation:
Dermal Leishmaniasis Research Unit, Central Farm, British Honduras
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Details are given of a trap for Phlebotomine sandflies attracted to a small mammal placed in a cage incorporated in the trap. It was developed in British Honduras for the purpose of studying the sandflies attracted to proven or possible hosts of Leishmania, other than man. The results of initial tests carried out at Central Farm from November 1964 to February 1965 are reported. These provided evidence that the sandflies caught in the trap were attracted to the rodents used as bait, and did not enter by chance; unbaited traps caught virtually no flies. In traps baited with rodents known to be reservoir-hosts of Leishmania, the species caught in greatest numbers was Phlebotomus apicalis Floch & Abonnenc, and amongst those caught in smaller numbers were P. cruciatus Coq. (including P. diabolicus Hall) and P. deleoni Fairchild & Hertig; it is suggested that all three are possible vectors of leishmaniasis in British Honduras. The relative numbers of the sandfly species caught in the traps were very different from those caught on man in British Honduras and by direct catching on animals in Panama.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 56 , Issue 3 , June 1966 , pp. 445 - 451
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. (1963). Leishmaniasis reservoir studies.—34th Rep. Gorgas Lab. pp. 10–13.Google Scholar
Anon. (1964). Leishmaniasis transmission—reservoir studies.—35th Rep. Gorgas Lab. pp. 18–21.Google Scholar
Adler, S. (1964). Leishmania.—Adv. Parasitol. 2 pp. 35–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Disney, R. H. L. (1964). Visceral involvement with dermal leishmaniasis in a wild-caught rodent in British Honduras.—Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 58 p. 581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floch, H. & Abonnenc, S. (1952). Faune de l'Union française (ancienne Faune de l'Empire français). XIV. Diptères phlébotomes de la Guyane et des Antilles françaises.—207 pp. Paris, Off. Rech. Sci. Outre-Mer.Google Scholar
Garnham, P. C. C. & Lewis, D. J. (1959). Parasites of British Honduras with special reference to leishmaniasis.—Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 53 p. 12–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lainson, R. & Strangways-Dixon, J. (1964). The epidemiology of dermal leishmaniasis in British Honduras: Part II. Reservoir-hosts of Leishmania mexicana among the forest rodents.—Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 58 pp. 136–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. J. & Garnham, P. C. C. (1959). The species of Phlebotomus (Diptera: Psychodidae) in British Honduras.—Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (B) 28 pp. 79–89.Google Scholar
Worth, C. B. & Jonkers, A. M. (1962). Two traps for mosquitoes attracted to small vertebrate animals.—Mosq. News 22 pp. 18–21.Google Scholar