Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-qks25 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-22T01:49:09.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Synonymy and Distribution of Chrysomyia rufifacies (Macq.), an Australian Sheep Blowfly

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

F. G. Holdaway
F. G. Holdaway
Affiliation:
Entomologist, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Canberra, F.C.T.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Australian sheep “ blowfly ” Chrysomyia rufifacies, Macq., is shown by a study of chaetotaxy and the genitalia to be distinct from C. albiceps with which it has been considered identical. A discussion is given of the composite genus Chrysomyia and the genera into which Séguy has recently divided it. The synonymy of C. rufifacies is given and also the distribution of C. rufifacies, C. albiceps and C. putoria, the three species which Patton has considered synonymous.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , December 1933 , pp. 549 - 560
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1933

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aubertin, D. 1932. Notes on the Oriental Species of the Genus Chrysomyia.—Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (10) ix, pp. 26–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austen, E. E. 1906. Synonyrnic notes on Musca marginalis Wied. and the genus Pycnosoma. Br. & von Berg.—Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., xvii, pp. 301–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bezzi, M. 1908. Ditteri eritrei raccolti dal Dott. Andreini e dal Prof. Tellini.—Bull. Soc. ent. Ital., xxxix, p. 48.Google Scholar
Bezzi, M. & Stein, P. 1907. Katalog der paläarktischen Dipteren. Band 3.Google Scholar
Bezzi, M. 1927. Some Calliphoridae (Dipt.) from the South Pacific Islands and Australia.—Bull. Ent. Res., xvii, pp. 231–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brauer, F. & von Bergenstamm, J. E. 1889–1894. Vorarbeiten zu einer Monographie der Muscaria Schizometopa (exclusive Anthomyiidae).—Denkschr. Akad. Wien.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brauer, F. 1895. Bemerkungen zu einigen neuen Gattungen der Muscarien und Deutung einiger Original-Exemplare.—SitzBer. Akad. Wien, civ, pp. 582–604.Google Scholar
Coquillet, D. W. 1910. The type-species of the North American genera of Diptera.—Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., xxxvii, no. 1719, pp. 499–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froggatt, W. W. 1913. The Sheep Maggot-fly Pest in Australia. 88 pp. Cooper Laboratory for Economic Research, Watford, England.Google Scholar
Froggatt, W. W. 1914a. Sheep maggot flies.—Agric. Gaz. N.S.W., xxv, pp. 756–758.Google Scholar
Froggatt, W. W. 1914b. The sheep maggot fly and its parasite.—Agric. Gaz. N.S.W., xxv, pp. 107–111.Google Scholar
Froggatt, W. W. 1915. Sheep maggot flies.—N.S.W. Dept. Agric. Farmers' Bull., No. 95, 52 pp.Google Scholar
Froggatt, W. W. 1921. Sheep maggot flies and their parasites.—Agric. Gaz. N. S. W., xxxii, pp. 725–731, 807–813.Google Scholar
Froggatt, W. W. 1922. Sheep maggot flies. No. 5. Methods of control recommended by the Department.—N.S.W. Dept. Agric. Farmers' Bull., No. 144, 32 pp.Google Scholar
Froggatt, W. W. & Froggatt, J. L. 1917. Sheep maggot flies. No. 3. Report of work carried out in the Riverina District during 1915–16, at the Government Sheep-fly Experiment Station at Wooloondool near Hay.—N.S.W. Dept. Agric. Farmers' Bull., No. 113, 37 pp.Google Scholar
Hardy, G. H. 1929. On the type locality of certain flies described by Macquart in “ Diptères exotiques,” Supplement 4.—Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W., liv, pp. 61–64.Google Scholar
Jarvis, E. & Cory, A. H. 1914. Sheep maggot fly pest.—Qd. Agric. J., i, pp. 116–123, 174–181.Google Scholar
Johnston, T. H. 1923. A survey of the Australian sheep maggot fly problem.—Trans. Proc. Roy. Soc. S. Aust., xlvii, pp. 201–211.Google Scholar
Macquart, J. 1843. Diptères exotiques nouveaux ou peu connus. ii, p. 146.Google Scholar
Macquart, J. 1850. Diptères exotiques nouveaux ou peu connus. Suppl. 4, p. 250.Google Scholar
Malloch, J. R. 1924. The recorded Calliphoridae of New Zealand.—Trans. Proc. N.Z. Inst., lv, pp. 638–640.Google Scholar
Malloch, J. R. 1926. Diptera Calyptratae from the Federated Malay States (first paper).—J.F.M.S. Mus., xiii, pp. 203–205.Google Scholar
Malloch, J. R. 1927. Notes on Australian Diptera. No. xi. Calliphoridae.—Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W., lii, pp. 299–335.Google Scholar
Mercier, L. 1927. Présence de Chrysomyia albiceps Wied. (mouche du ver épineux de la laine des moutons australiens) sur la côte du Calvados.—C.R. Acad. Sci. Fr., clxxxv, pp. 795–797.Google Scholar
Patton, W. S. 1921. Notes on the myiasis-producing Diptera of man and animals.—Bull. Ent. Res., xii, pp. 239–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patton, W. S. 1922. Notes on the Calliphorinae. Pt. I. The Oriental species.—Bull. Ent. Res., xiii, pp. 109–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patton, W. S. 1922. Some notes on Indian Calliphorinae. Pts. II–V.—Ind. J. Med. Res., ix, pp. 548–574.Google Scholar
Patton, W. S. 1925. Diptera of medical and veterinary importance. I. Types of older authors in continental Museums.—Philipp. J. Sci., xxvii, pp. 177–200.Google Scholar
Patton, W. S. 1925. Diptera of medical and veterinary importance. II. The more important blowflies, Calliphorinae.—Philipp. J. Sci., xxvii, pp. 397–411.Google Scholar
Patton, W. S. & Evans, A. M. 1929. Insects, Ticks, Mites and venomous Animals of medical and veterinary Importance. Pt. I. Medical.—Liverpool School Trop. Medicine, x + 785 pp.Google Scholar
Robineau-Desvoidy, A. J. B. 1830. Essai sur les Myodaires, p. 444.Google Scholar
Rondani, C. 1850. Nuovi Ann. Sci. Nat. Bologna, (3) ii, pp. 357–372.Google Scholar
Rondani, C. 1861. Dipterologicae Italicae Prodromus, iv, p. 9.Google Scholar
Rondani, C. 1861. (1862?). Atti Acad. Sci. Bologna, iv.Google Scholar
Rondani, C. 1863. Dipterorum species et genera aliqua exotica.—Arch. Zool. Modena, iii, p. 27.Google Scholar
Rondani, C. 1873. Muscaria exotica Musei Civici Januensis observata et distincta.—Ann. Mus. Genova, iv, pp. 282–300.Google Scholar
Rondani, C. 1875. Muscaria exotica Musei Civici Januensis observata et distincta. Part III.—Ann. Mus. Genova, vii, pp. 421–464.Google Scholar
Séguy, E. 1927. Etudes sur les mouches parasites et les formes voisines. I. Contribution à la connaissance des Chrysomyiini typiques.—Encyc. Ent., Sér. B. II, Dipt. iv, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Séguy, E. 1928. Etudes sur les mouches parasites. I. Conopides, Oestrides, et Calliphorines de l'Europe occidentale.—Encyc. Ent., Sér. A, ix, 251 pp. (Chrysomyia pp. 140–145.)Google Scholar
Séguy, E. 1928. Etudes sur les mouches parasites et les formes voisines. II. Contribution à la connaissance des Chrysomyiini typiques.—Encyc. Ent., Sér. B. II, Dipt. iv, pp. 101–116.Google Scholar
Senior-White, R. 1922. Notes on Indian Diptera.—Mem. Dept. Agric. India, vii, pp. 83–169.Google Scholar
Senior-White, R. 1926. A Revision of the sub-family Calliphorinae in the Oriental Region.—Rec. Ind. Mus., xxviii, pp. 127–140.Google Scholar
Townsend, C. H. T. 1915. A new generic name for the Screw-worm Fly.—J. Wash. Acad. Sci., v, pp. 644–646.Google Scholar
Villeneuve, J. 1914. Quelques réflexions au sujet de la tribu de Calliphorinae.—Bull. Soc. ent. Fr., 1914, pp. 256–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiedemann, C. R. W. 1819. Beschreibung neuer Zweiflügler aus Ostindien und Afrika.—Zool. Mag., xii, p. 38.Google Scholar
Wiedemann, C. R. W. 1830. Aussereuropäische zweiflügelige Insekten, ii, p. 395.Google Scholar