Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:34:43.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The role of ants, especially the fire ant, Solenopsis geminata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), in the biological control of tropical upland rice pests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

M.J. Way*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, Silwood Park, Ascot, Berks SL5 7PY, UK
G. Javier
Affiliation:
International Rice Research Institute, DAPO Box 7777, Metro Manila, Philippines
*
*Fax +44 (0)1344 294339 E-mail: m.cammell@ic.ac.uk

Abstract

Predatory ants are omnipresent year-round in upland (dryland) rice fields in the Philippines. At least 14 species were identified of which the very aggressive Solenopsis geminata (Fabricius) and also Tapinoma sp. nr indicum Forel usually predominated. Some highly aggressive species, notably Pheidolegeton spp. and Bothriomyrmex dalyi Forel were localized. Solenopsis geminata flourished within many fields, not only during the crop season but also throughout dry season fallows where they remained aggressively predatory. Rice plants infested with brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens (Stål) were usually found within a few hours and S. geminata workers were quickly recruited to N. lugens aggregates. Predation was usually incomplete and workers began to solicit the few remaining late instar or adult N. lugens survivors. These oviposited but no second generation nymphs appeared. There was a surge of recruited ants at the time of N. lugens egg hatch when surviving adults were also killed. Initially, S. geminata alone killed N. lugens aggregates less quickly than with the whole predator complex but ultimately its sole effect was as great as that of the complex. Scattered N. lugens adults, corresponding to numbers that initially colonize rice plants, were eliminated as quickly by S. geminata alone as by the predator complex. Tapinoma indicum occurring separately or with S. geminata on the same plant contributed to predation of N. lugens especially on young nymphs. Solenopsis geminata attacked other insects on rice notably leaffolders of which 97% mortality was recorded when they were exposed throughout egg and larval stages. The role of S. geminata as a predator of upland rice pests is discussed in the context of known biological control of pests of non-rice dryland crops in the tropics and sub-tropics by S. geminata and other Solenopsis spp.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carroll, C.R. & Risch, S.J. (1983) Tropical annual cropping systems: ant ecology. Environmental Management 7, 5157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J.H., Johnson, S.J. & Wright, U.L. (1990) Qualitative survivorship analysis of the velvetbean caterpillar (Lepidoptera; Noctuidae) pupae in soybean fields in Louisiana. Environmental Entomology 19, 978986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Litsinger, J.A., Barrion, A.T. & Soekarna, D. (1987) Upland rice insect pests: their ecology, importance and control. 41 pp. IRRI Research Paper Series no. 123. Los Baños, Philippines, International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
Reagan, T.E. (1986) Beneficial aspects of the imported fire ant: a field ecology approach. pp. 5871. in Lofgren, C.S. & Vander Meer, R.K.(Eds) Fire ants and leaf-cutting ants. Westview, Boulder and London.Google Scholar
Risch, S.J. (1981) Ants as important predators of rootworm eggs in the neotropics. Journal of Economic Entomology 74, 8890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risch, S.J. & Carroll, C.R. (1982) Effects of a keystone predaceous ant, Solenopsis geminata, on arthropods in a tropical agroecosystem. Ecology 63, 19791983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risch, S.J. & Carroll, C.R. (1982) The ecological role of ants in two Mexican agroecosystems. Oecologia 55, 114119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saks, M.E. & Carroll, C.R. (1980) Ant foraging activity in tropical agroecosystems. Agro-Ecosystems 6, 177188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepard, B.M., Barrion, A.T. & Litsinger, J.A. (1987) Helpful insects, spiders and pathogens. 136 pp. Los Baños, Philippines, International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
Sterling, W.L., Jones, D. & Dean, D.A. (1979) Failure of the red imported fire ant to reduce entomophagous insect and spider abundance in a cotton agroecosystem. Environmental Entomology 8, 976981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbina, P. (1995) Los amigos del agricultor no. 5. Las tortillas controlan hormigas. 4 pp. Honduras, El Zamorana.Google Scholar
Way, M.J. & Heong, K.L. (1994) The role of biodiversity in the dynamics and management of insect pests of tropical irrigated rice – a review. Bulletin of Entomological Research 84, 567587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Way, M.J. & Khoo, K.C. (1992) Role of ants in pest management. Annual Review of Entomology 37, 479503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Way, M.J., Islam, Z., Heong, K.L. & Joshi, R.C. (1998) Ants in tropical irrigated rice: distribution and abundance, especially of Solenopsis geminata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 88, 467476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar