Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T23:55:00.863Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The potential of some newer photostable pyrethroids to select for resistance in the housefly Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

P.A. Chapman*
Affiliation:
Central Science Laboratory, MAFF, Slough, UK
D.P. Webb*
Affiliation:
Central Science Laboratory, MAFF, Slough, UK
S.J. Walker*
Affiliation:
Central Science Laboratory, MAFF, Slough, UK
*
Central Science Laboratory (CSL), MAFF, London Rd, Slough, SL3 7HJ, UK.
Central Science Laboratory (CSL), MAFF, London Rd, Slough, SL3 7HJ, UK.
Central Science Laboratory (CSL), MAFF, London Rd, Slough, SL3 7HJ, UK.

Abstract

A strain of Musca domestica Linnaeus with low pyrethroid resistance was divided into four sub-strains, each was subjected to three selections in the laboratory with either alphacypermethrin, cypermethrin, deltamethrin or permethrin. Each selected strain was then tested for cross-resistance to the other pyrethroids and to synergized pyrethrins. Pyrethroid resistance was increased by all selecting agents by a factor of between 1.5 and 3.6 as measured at the KD50, thus demonstrating that the newer persistent pyrethroids had a similar potential to select for pyrethroid resistance as did permethrin. A field trial using a commercial alphacypermethrin formulation was carried out in an intensive animal unit against a population of M. domestica with a high pyrethroid resistance. After a high initial kill, the population rapidly recovered and a second application failed to control the population. Pre- and post-trial M. domestica samples were taken and resistance to alphacypermethrin and synergized pyrethrins was shown to have increased from 54.5 to 263.6 and 15.2 to 28.4 at the KD50, respectively.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bull, D.L. (1992) Target site and enzyme changes associated with selection of subcolonies of a multiresistant housefly strain with methyl parathion or permethrin. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 42, 211226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, P.A. & Lloyd, C.J. (1981) The spread of resistance among houseflies from farms in the United Kingdom. Proceedings of the 1981 British Crop Protection Conference 2, 625631.Google Scholar
Chapman, P.A. & Morgan, C.P. (1992) Insecticide resistance in Musca domestica L. from eastern England. Pesticide Science 36, 3545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denholm, I., Farnham, A.W., O'Dell, K. & Sawicki, R.M. (1983) Factors affecting resistance to insecticides in houseflies, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae). I. Long-term control with bioresmethrin of flies with strong pyrethroid-resistance potential. Bulletin of Entomological Research 73, 481489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeVries, D.H. & Georghiou, G.P. (1981) Decreased never sensitivity and decreased cuticular penetration as mechanisms of resistance to pyrethroids in a (1R)-trans-permethrin-selected strain of the housefly. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 15, 234241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, M., Farnham, A.W., Janes, N.F., Needham, W.H., Pulman, D.A. & Stevenson, J.H. (1973) A photostable pyrethroid. Nature (London) 246, 169170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farnham, A.W. (1971) Changes in cross-resistance patterns of houseflies selected with natural pyrethrins or resmethrin (5-benzyl-3-furylmethyl (±)-cis-trans-chrysanthemate). Pesticide Science 2, 138143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farnham, A.W., Murray, A.W.A., Sawicki, R.M., Denholm, I. & White, J.C. (1987) Characterization of the structure-activity relationship of kdr and two variants of super-kdr to pyrethroids in the housefly (Musca domestica L.). Pesticide Science 19, 209220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, C.R., Turnbull, S.A., Whistlecraft, J.W. & Surgeoner, G.A. (1982) Multiple resistance shown by field strains of housefly, Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae), to organochlorine, organophosphorus, carbamate and pyrethroid insecticides. Canadian Entomologist 114, 447454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, R.S., Surgeoner, G.A., Solomon, K.R. & Harris, C.R. (1983) Effect of four spray regimes on the development of permethrin and dichlorvos resistance, in the laboratory, by the housefly. Journal of Economic Entomology 76, 417422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J.A., Georghiou, G.P. & Hawley, M.K. (1987) Housefly (Diptera: Muscidae) resistance to permethrin on southern California dairies. Journal of Economic Entomology 80, 636640.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, J.G. & Georghiou, G.P. (1985) Rapid development of high-level permethrin resistance in a field-collected strain of the housefly (Diptera: Muscidae) under laboratory selection. Journal of Economic Entomology 78, 316319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, D.P., Wildey, K.B. & Chapman, P.A. (1989) A comparison of permethrin and methomyl insecticides for the control of a multiresistant strain of houseflies (Musca domestica). Pesticide Science 27, 1322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar