Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T07:32:02.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Population density, development and behaviour of Diopsis longicornis and D. apicalis (Diptera: Diopsidae) on rice in the Republic of Guinée

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

H. Chiasson  and
S.B. Hill
H. Chiasson*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Macdonald Campus of McGill University, Canada
S.B. Hill
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Macdonald Campus of McGill University, Canada
*
H. Chiasson, Department of Entomology, Macdonald Campus of McGill University, Ste-Anne-de-Belevue, QC Canada H9X 3V9.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The behaviour and pest status of the rice stem borers Diopsis longicornis Macquart and D. apicalis Dalman were investigated in the Republic of Guinée, particularly during the dry season. The variables were direct seeded and transplanted rice, and three (1988, 1989) and four (1987) planting dates. Transplanted rice was damaged nearly three times more than direct seeded rice in the dry season, but no significant difference was detected during the wet season. As previously observed in other West African countries, D.apicalis only occasionally damages rice in Guinée. Contrary to findings elsewhere, D. longicornis was not an important pest of Guinean rice, infesting only 5% and 3% of stems over the three dry and the two wet seasons, respectively. However, year round rice production could promote build up of the diopsid population if dry season planting is not sufficiently delayed (45 days) after the last rains of the wet season.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 83 , Issue 1 , March 1993 , pp. 5 - 13
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agyen-Sampong, M. (1988) Assessment of on-farm losses in rice due to insect pests. Insect Science and its Application 9, 691–695.Google Scholar
Alghali, A.M. (1980) Effect of spacing on the infestation of Diopsis thoracica, West. WARDA Technical Newsletter 2, 11.Google Scholar
Altieri, M.A. (1987) The significance of diversity in the maintenance of the sustainability of traditional agroecosystems. ILEIA Newsletter 3, 3–7.Google Scholar
Brenière, J. (1983) Principaux ennemis du riz en Afrique de l´ouest et leur contrÔle. Deuxième édition. 87 pp. Monrovia, Liberia, Association pour le dévelopment de la Riziculture en Afrique de I´ouest.Google Scholar
Cochereau, P. (1985) Les relations entre un riz de bas fond et l´évolution des populations de Diopsis thoracica Westwood (Diptera, Diopsidae) en Côte d´Ivoire Centrale. 16 pp. B.P. 604, Bouaké, Côte d´Ivoire. Institut des Savanes (IDESSA), IDESSA-ORSTOM.Google Scholar
Descamps, M. (1957) Contribution à l´étude des diptères Diopsidae nuisibles au riz dans le nord Cameroun. Journal d´Agriculture Tropicale et de Botanique Appliquée 4, 83–93.Google Scholar
Dobelmann, J.P. (1976) Riziculture pratique. 1. Riz irrigué. 236 pp. Techniques vivantes Collection publiée par l´Agence de coopération culturelle et technique. Paris, Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
FAO, Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (1979) Directives pour la lutte intégrée contre les ennemis du riz. Etude FAO: Production végétale et protection des plantes 14, 117 pp.Google Scholar
Feijen, H.R. (1984) Studies on the systematics, ecology and economic importance of the Diopsioinea (Diptera). PhD Thesis, Leiden University.Google Scholar
Gomez, K.A. & Gomez, A.A. (1984) Statistical procedures for agricultural research. Second edition. 680 pp. An international Rice Research Institute Book. New York, Wiley-Interscience Publication.Google Scholar
Morgan, H.G. & Abu, J.F. (1973) Seasonal abundance of Diopsis(Diptera, Diopsidae) on irrigated rice in the Accra plains. Ghana Journal of Agricultural Science 6, 185–191.Google Scholar
Pollet, A. (1978) Les insects ravageurs du riz en Côte d´Ivoire. IV. Déterminisme des infestations du riz irrigué en Côte d´Ivoire centrale (Kotiessou). Cahiers ORSTOM Série Biologie 13, 87–99.Google Scholar
Salomon, J.N. (1987) Exploitation et mise en valeur traditionnelle des terres de mangrove en Afrique de l´ouest. Les Cahiers d´Outre-Mer 160, 313–341.Google Scholar
SAS Statistical programme (1988) SAS/STATTM Users Guide. Release 6.03 Edition. 1028 pp. Cary, NC. SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Scheibelreiter, G. (1974) The importance of Diopsis tenuipes Westwood as a pest of rice, based on a comparison of the egg-laying behaviour of D. tenuipes and D. thoracica Westwood. Ghana Journal of Agricultural Science 7, 143–145.Google Scholar
Scheibelreiter, G. (1977) Distribution of eggs of Diopsis thoracica Westwood in irrigated rice-fields and on rice plants in Ghana during the dry season. Ghana Journal of Agricultural Science 10, 109–111.Google Scholar
Soumah, Y. (1984) Influence des dégats de Diopsis thoracica West. sur le tallage et le rendement du riz irrigué variété TK30, dans les conditions édapho-climatiques de Foulayah-Kindia. Mémoire de fin d´études supérierures. 47 pp. Institut des Sciences Agro-Zootechniques de Foulayah-Kindia. République de Guinée.Google Scholar
Tran, M. (1981) Reconnaissance des principaux foreurs des tiges du riz, du maïs et de la canne à sucre en Côte d´Ivoire. Initiations. Documentations techniques ORSTOM. Paris 48, 23 pp., 32 pls.Google Scholar
Vercambre, B. (1982) Diopsis thoracica West (Dipt. Diopsidae), important ravageur de riz en Afrique de I´ouest: données bio-écoloqiques et application à la lutte int´gr´e. Agronomie Tropicale 37, 89–98.Google Scholar