Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T14:06:41.467Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Observations on the Parasites of the Pine-shoot Moth, Rhyacionia buoliana, Schiff.*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

W. H. Thorpe
Affiliation:
Imperial Institute of Entomology.

Extract

A preliminary study of the parasites of the Pine-shoot Moth, Rhyacionia buoliana, in England was undertaken at the request of the Dominion Entomologist of Canada.

In all twenty-eight species of primary and secondary parasites were obtained. Thirteen of these species were represented in our material by not more than two specimens and are probably of little economic importance. Of the remaining fifteen, two (Habrocytus and Eutelus) are definitely hyperparasites, and at least two of the Pimplines (P. ruficollis and P. brevicornis) are liable to live as hyperparasites under certain conditions.

The dominant or “key” parasites in this complex appear to be the Braconid, Orgilus obscurator, and two Ophionines, Cremastus interruptor and Omorgus mutabilis. These were shipped to Canada and the first two have become established there.

A brief account is given of the salient facts in the biology of each species and the more important diagnostic characters of the adults are described to facilitate accurate identification, often a very difficult matter.

The mature larvae of the commoner species are described in detail, with the particular object of finding satisfactory specific characters.

Of the common species the majority attack the larva. Pimpla examinator is the only true pupal parasite which is at all common, but Omorgus mutabilis and Orgilus obscurator, although they are essentially larval parasites, frequently remain in their host and complete their development after it has pupated. Four other species, though normally living as larval parasites, may occasionally emerge from the pupa. One egg-parasite, Trichogramma evanescens, was recorded.

None of the common species is confined to R. buoliana, and there is no reason to suppose that the other species, about which less is known, are any more specific. Five of the species reared are new to Great Britain and eighteen constitute new records for this host.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1930

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Busck, A. (1915). The European Pine-shoot Moth; a Serious Menace to Pine Timber in America.—Bull. U.S. Dept. Agric. no. 170, 11 pp.Google Scholar
Crossman, S. S. (1922). A panteles melanoscelus, an imported Parasite of the Gipsy Moth.—Bull. U.S. Dept. Agric. no. 1028, 25 pp., 4 pls.Google Scholar
Cushman, R. A. & Rohwer, S. A. (1920). Holarctic Tribes of the Ichneumon Flies of the Sub-family Ichneumonidae (Pimplinae).—Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., Washington, lvii, pp. 379396.Google Scholar
Feytaud, J. (1921). Les ennemies du Pin. La Tordeuse de Buol (Evetria buoliana, Schiff.).—Rev. Zool. agric. & app., Bordeaux, xx, pp. 8891.Google Scholar
Genieys, P. (1925). Habrobracon brevicornis, Wesm.—Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer., xviii, p. 104.Google Scholar
Imms, A. D. (1918). Observations on Pimpla pomorum, Ratz., a Parasite of the Apple Blossom Weevil (including a Description of the Male by Claude Morley).—Ann. Appl. Biol., iv, pp. 211227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, T. A. (18881901). Les Braconides, in André's Species des Hyménoptères d'Europe et d'Algèrie, iv & v.Google Scholar
Morley, C. (19031914). Ichneumonologia Britannica, i–v.Google Scholar
Pantel, (1898). Recherches sur les Diptères à larves entomobies. Le Thrixion halidayanum, Rond.—La Cellule, xv, pp. 1290.Google Scholar
Schmiedeknecht, O. (19061929). Opuscula Ichneumonologica, i–v.Google Scholar
Seyrig, A. (19261927). Observations sur les Ichneumons.—Ann. Soc. ent. France, 1926, pp. 157172; 1927, pp. 6367.Google Scholar
Seyrig, A. (1927). Etudes sur les Ichneumonides.—Eos, iii, p. 221.Google Scholar
Smits Van Burgst, C. A. L. (1919). Sluipwespen gekweet uit de Dennenlotrups (Evetria buoliana, Schiff.); Perilampus batavus, sp. n.—Tijdschr. Ent., lxi, pp. 143146 (R.A.E., A, vii, p. 234).Google Scholar
Thompson, W. R., & Parker, H. L. (1930). The Morphology and Biology of Eulimneria crassifemur, an important Parasite of the European Corn Borer.—J. Agric. Res., xl, pp. 321345.Google Scholar
Voukassovitch, P. (1927). La lutte pour la possession de l'hôte chez les larves des Chalcidides (ectoparasites solitaires).—Bull. Biol. Fr. Belg., lxi, pp. 315325.Google Scholar
Wainwright, C. J. (1928). The British Tachinidae.—Trans. Ent. Soc. London, 1928, pp. 139254.Google Scholar