Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T08:00:00.230Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Observations on an Abnormal Form of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

G. H. Caswell
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University College, Ibadan, Nigeria.

Extract

Under certain conditions, Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) produces males and females which are distinct from the normal ones. These are called here the “ active ” form, and in southern Nigeria they occur most commonly during the months March to June. The active form has a longer pre-adult stage than has the normal form and it flies readily, unlike the normal form. There is some evidence which indicates that a genetic factor is involved in the production of the active form but no clear indication as to what external factors are involved. The normal female has mature eggs in its calyces within a day of emergence, and will lay about 60 eggs. The active female was found to have immature ovaries on emergence and these did not develop to any great extent in the conditions employed. About three-quarters of the active females never produce any eggs, and the rest produce an average of seven. This difference in egg-production probably makes food reserves available which are used to prolong the life of the active female. The eggs laid by active females are rarely fertile, and when adults do emerge they are apparently normal males and females.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Caswell, G. H. (1956). Observations on the biology of Callosobruchus maculatus F. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae).—Divl. Rep. Fac. Agric. Univ. Coll. Ibadan (Ent.) no. 3, 9 pp., multigraph.Google Scholar
El-Sawaf, S. K. (1956). Some factors affecting the longevity, oviposition, and rate of development in the southern cowpea weevil, Callosobruchus maculatus F. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae).—Bull. Soc. ent. Egypte 40 pp. 2995.Google Scholar
Larson, A. O. & Fisher, C. K. (1938). The bean weevil and the southern cowpea weevil in California.—Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. no. 593, 70 pp.Google Scholar
Southgate, B. J., Howe, R. W. & Brett, G. A. (1957). The specific status of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) and Callosobruchus analis (F.).—Bull. ent. Res. 48 pp. 7989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Utida, S. (1954). “ Phase ” dimorphism observed in the laboratory population of the cowpea weevil, Callosobruchus quadrimaculatus. [In Japanese with English summary.]Oyo-Dobuts. Zasshi 18 pp. 161168.Google Scholar