Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T14:01:17.004Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Laboratory Studies on the Bionomics of the Rat Fleas, Xenopsylla brasiliensis, Baker and X. cheopis, Roths

III. Further Factors affecting Adult Longevity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

E. B. Edney
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The paper describes work carried out to find the causes of certain discrepancies in the results of longevity experiments on rat-fleas.

2. The following factors were found to reduce significantly the survival period of unfed adult fleas:—

Rearing larvae together rather than in separate tubes; Parent fleas over 11 days old; Using very fine rather than coarse sand as a matrix for larval food; Drying the blood for larval food by baking rather than in a vacuum over sulphuric acid at room temperature.

3. The following factors were found to have no significant effect upon adult longevity:—

Contamination of larval food by mice and their droppings;

Presence or absence of adult flea faeces in larval food.

4. The effect upon the weight of larvae and the duration of the larval period of some of the above-mentioned factors is described. The female larval period is shown to be shorter than that of the male under all conditions used.

5. It is confirmed that there is no significant difference between the longevity of male and female adults which have fed once or not at all, and that females which have fed frequently before starvation live longer than males.

6. Well developed, unfed, laboratory-bred adult fleas live longer than those which have fed once before starvation, and the latter live longer than those which have fed several times.

7. There is some evidence that unfed wild-caught fleas live longer than wildcaught fleas which have fed, but this needs confirmation.

8. All the available information regarding factors affecting adult longevity is summarised in a table.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , December 1947 , pp. 389 - 404
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1947

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, P., Kitchener, J. A. & Briscoe, H. V. A. (1944). Ann. appl. Biol., 31, pp. 143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacot, A. W. & Martin, C. J. (1924). J. Hyg., 23, pp. 98–105.Google Scholar
Dennell, R. (1945). Nature, 155, p. 545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edney, E. B. (1945). Bull. ent. Res., 35, pp. 399–416.Google Scholar
Edney, E. B. (1947). Bull. ent. Res., 38, pp. 263–280.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1941). Statistical methods for research workers. London.Google Scholar
Hopkins, G. H. E. (1935). Parasitology, 27, pp. 480–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, C. G. (1942). Biol. Rev., 17, pp. 151–177.Google Scholar
Leeson, H. S. (1932). Parasitology, 24, pp. 196–205.Google Scholar
Leeson, H. S. (1936). Parasitology, 23, pp. 403–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharif, M. (1937). Phil. Trans. roy. Soc., 227, pp. 465–538.Google Scholar
Sikes, E. K. (1931). Parasitology, 23, pp. 243–249.Google Scholar
Webster, W. J. (1930). Indian J. med. Res., 18, pp. 391–405.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B. (1944a). Nature, 153, p. 493.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B. (1944b). Nature, 154, p. 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B. (1945). J. exp. Biol., 21, pp. 97–114.Google Scholar