Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T23:27:38.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Laboratory studies on dispersion behaviour of adult beetles in grain. XII.—The effect of isolated pockets of damp and mouldy wheat on Cryptolestes ferrugineus (Steph.) (Coleoptera, Cucujidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Gordon Surtees
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Council, Pest Infestation Laboratory, Slough, Bucks.

Extract

The effects of pockets of damp wheat upon the spatial structure (dispersion) of experimental populations of adults of Cryptolestes ferrugineus (Steph.) were investigated in the laboratory. Isolated pockets of non-mouldy wheat of 18 per cent, moisture content (85 per cent. R.H.) and of equally moist wheat supporting a mould flora (mainly Aspergillus candidus) were placed in a larger bulk of wheat of 14 per cent, moisture content (70 per cent. R.H.) at 25°C. One hundred beetles were released at the centre of the top surface of the bulk, and their dispersion within it was observed one week later. The method used allowed the entire bulk (25 kg.) to be quickly broken down so that the relative numbers of individuals in each of the 64 cubes of which it was composed could be recorded. Using other apparatus, the responses of single, isolated individuals to these physical conditions were analysed.

Insects reared at 25°C. and 70 per cent. R.H. accumulated to an equal extent in the pockets of damp wheat irrespective of whether it was mouldy or not. Insects in a preferendum arena went to the drier side, i.e., to 70 per cent, as opposed to 85 per cent. R.H., and the underlying mechanism was found to be a klinokinetic response to humidity. Maintaining insects at 40 or 85 per cent. R.H. for 14 days before testing did not alter their dispersion behaviour in bulks of grain; maintenance at 40 per cent. R.H. did not alter their response to humidity in a preferendum arena, but at 80 per cent. R.H. it was abolished.

A study of oviposition behaviour showed that when there was a choice between wheat of 18 and 14 per cent, moisture content, nearly all the eggs were laid in the damper grain, both when it was mouldy and when it was not. It is considered that oviposition requirements, and to some extent trophic behaviour patterns, over-ride the hygrokinetic response when wheat is damp or damaged, but that under field conditions, where the presence of dust and broken grain throughout the bulk provide conditions suited for oviposition and feeding, accumulations due solely to hygrokinesis may occur in the drier parts of a bulk.

The results are discussed in relation to the ecology of the species in grain and to its detection and control; and evidence from this and other studies is discussed in relation to the dynamic nature of spatial organisation of insect populations in grain.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Freeman, J. A. (1952). Laemophloeus spp. as major pests of stored grain.— Plant Path, 1 pp. 6976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, J. A. (1962). The influence of climate on insect populations of flour mills.—Verh. XI. int. Kongr. Ent. 2 pp. 301308.Google Scholar
Gunn, D. L. & Kennedy, J. S. (1936). Apparatus for investigating the reactions of land arthropods to humidity.—J. exp. Biol. 13 pp. 450459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, R. W. & Lefkovitch, L. P. (1957). The distribution of the storage species of Cryptolestes (Col., Cucujidae).—Bull. ent. Res. 48 pp. 795809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxley, T. A. (1948). The scientific principles of grain storage.—103 pp. Liverpool, North. Publ. Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Rilett, R. O. (1949). The biology of Laemophloeus ferrugineus (Steph.).— Canad. J. Res. Sect. D 27 pp. 112148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sinha, R. N. (1961). Insects and mites associated with hot spots in farm-stored grain.— Canad. Ent. 93 pp. 609621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, L. B. (1962). Observations on the oviposition rate of the rusty grain beetle Cryptoletes ferrugineus (Steph.) (Coleoptera: Cucujidae).—Ann. ent. Soc. Amer. 55 pp. 7782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surtees, G. (1963 a). Laboratory studies on dispersion behaviour of adult beetles in grain. I.—The grain weevil, Sitophilus granarius (L.) (Coleoptera, Curculionidae).—Bull. ent. Res. 54 pp. 147159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surtees, G. (1963 b). … II.—The saw-toothed grain beetle, Oryzaephilus surinamensis(L.) (Coleoptera, Silvanidae).—Bull. ent. Res. 54 pp. 285296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surtees, G. (1963 c). … III.—Tribolium castaneum (Hbst.) (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae) and Cryptolestes ferrugineus (Steph.) (Coleoptera, Cucujidae).—Bull. ent. Res. 54 pp. 297306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surtees, G. (1964 a). … V.—Technique for three-dimensional analysis of dispersion patterns within small bulks.—Bull. ent. Res. 54 pp. 723–;725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surtees, G. (1964 b). … VI.—Three-dimensional analysis of dispersion of five species in a uniform bulk.—Bull. ent. Res. 55 pp. 161171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surtees, G. (1964 c). … VIII.—Spontaneous activity in three species and a new approach to analysis of kinesis mechanisms.—Anim. Behav. 12 pp. 374377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surtees, G. (1964 d). … VII.—The effect of isolated pockets of damp and mouldy grain on Tribolium castaneum (Hbst.) (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae).— Bull. ent. Res. 55 pp. 327337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surtees, G. (1964 e). Site of damage to whole wheat grains by five species of stored-products beetle.—Ent. mon. Mag. 99 pp. 178181.Google Scholar
Surtees, G. (1964 f). Laboratory studies on dispersion behaviour of adult beetles grain. XI.—Some effects of temperature.—Anim. Behav. 12 pp. 378381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surtees, G. (1965). … X.—Reactions of saw-toothed grain beetles, Oryzaephilus surinamensis (L.) to isolated pockets of damp and mouldy wheat.—J. appl. Ecol. 1 pt. 2.Google Scholar