Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T15:30:12.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The influence of a deep river valley system on the dispersal of Aedes mosquitos

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

W. Klassen
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
B. Hocking
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

Extract

The influence of a deep river valley system on the distribution of dispersing Aedes mosquitos was studied during 1958–59 in the vicinity of Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Mosquito breeding within an area extending two to three miles beyond the city limits was prevented by anti-larval measures, and almost the only remaining breeding places were situated on the plains several miles to the north-west and south-east, yet considerable numbers of mosquitos appeared every spring in that part of the city included in the valley-ravine system of the North Saskatchewan River. Previous work had suggested that mosquitos dispersing across the plains were collected by the valley-ravine system and entered the city by passing down the main valley. The present paper attempts to account for this directed dispersal in terms of the behaviour of Aedes mosquitos in response to certain physical factors in the environment. The species mainly concerned were Aedes cataphylla Dyar, A. fitchii (Felt & Young), A. excrucians (Wlk.) and A. stimulans (Wlk.).

The initiation of dispersal flight downwind across the plains at twilight was observed. This took place soon after emergence and was not prevented by moderate winds. It was shown experimentally that neither high wind speeds nor turbulence inhibited the flight of newly emerged Aedes mosquitos, but that individuals several days old were reluctant to take flight in turbulent conditions. Since wind speeds on the plains were generally higher than those in the valleys, these reactions would tend to confine older mosquitos to the valleys while not preventing dispersal of newly emerged mosquitos across the plains.

The direction of the initial dispersal flights from the breeding places was observed in mosquitos escaping from rearing cages. Take-off was characteristically into the wind, but re-orientation downwind took place when the mosquitos began to be blown backwards in flight. It was shown experimentally, by releasing mosquitos in the field when the wind was very light, that the preferred direction of flight uninfluenced by wind was towards the lowest part of the horizon, both on the plains and in the valley. This response would tend to cause mosquitos on the plain to fly into ravines and valleys, and thence down-stream within them. Dispersing mosquitos would thus tend to be held by any valleys or ravines in their path.

Swarming was never observed near the pools from which the mosquitos emerged, but was mainly seen in the valley or on the edge of the valley and ravines. Swarming of A. cataphylla took place during the evenings after the initial dispersal. The swarms were predominantly male but mating occurred during swarming. A cohesive factor seemed to be involved in the behaviour of the swarms, and further dispersal also seemed to occur gregariously; the movement of large male swarms down the river valley was observed.

By the application of optomotor theories of insect flight to previously published data on the flight speed and behaviour of A. aegypti (L.) and A. punctor (Kby.), the relationships between wind speed and permissible heights of flight of these species upwind and downwind were calculated. These relationships were consistent with the observations on dispersal of Aedes mosquitos in the Edmonton area, and could largely explain the mechanism by means of which deep valleys attracted and held dispersing mosquitos.

In contrast to the open plains, the wooded river valley provides a more favourable environment for adult mosquitos. The supply of nectar is greater, saturation deficiency and wind speeds are lower and less variable, and shaded resting sites are more abundant.

Observations on mosquitos in chambers with either vertical or horizontal humidity gradients suggested that the behaviour of Aedes mosquitos is not greatly influenced by humidity.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Afridi, M. K. & Majid, A. (1938). Observations on the range of dispersion of Culex fatigans and its infiltration into the Delhi urban area. Part I.—J. Malar. Inst. India 1 pp. 155167.Google Scholar
Curtis, L. C. (1953). Observations on mosquitoes at Whitehorse, Yukon Territory (Culieidae: Diptera).—Canad. Ent. 85 pp. 353370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downes, J. A. (1958). Assembly and mating in the biting Nematocera.—Proc. 10th int. Congr. Ent. 2 pp. 425434.Google Scholar
Förchtgott, J. (1950). The transport of small particles or insects over the Ore mountains.—Met. Zpravy, Prague 1 p. 14.Google Scholar
Garrett-Jones, C. (1950). A dispersion of mosquitoes by wind.—Nature, Lond. 165 p. 285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geiger, R. (1950). The climate near the ground. (A translation by Stewart, Milroy N. and others.)—482 pp. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard Univ. Pr.Google Scholar
Goedon, W. M. & Page, R. Z. (1943). The effect of winds of hurricane velocity on mosquito trapping results at Corpus Christi, Texas.—Ent. News 54 pp. 251252.Google Scholar
Haeger, J. S. (1960). Behavior preceding migration in the salt-marsh mosquito, Aedes taeniorhynchus (Wiedemann).—Mosq. News 20 pp. 136147.Google Scholar
Hassenstein, B. (1958). Die Stärke von optokinetisehen Reaktionen auf verschiedene Mustergeschwindigkeiten.—Z. Naturforschg. 13b pt. 1 pp. 16.Google Scholar
Haufe, W. O. & Burgess, L. (1960). Design and efficiency of mosquito traps based on visual response to patterns.—Canad. Ent. 92 pp. 124140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hearle, E. (1926). The mosquitoes of the lower Fraser Valley, British Columbia, and their control.—Rep. nat. Res. Coun. Can. no. 17, 94 pp.Google Scholar
Hocking, B. (1953). The intrinsic range and speed of flight of insects.—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Land. 104 pp. 223346.Google Scholar
Hocking, B. (1963). The use of attractants and repellents in vector control.—Bull. World Hlth Org. 29 suppl. pp. 121126.Google ScholarPubMed
Hocking, B. & Lindsay, I. S. (1958). Reactions of insects to the olfactory stimuli from the components of an insecticidal spray.—Bull. ent. Res. 49 pp. 675683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hocking, B., Richards, W. R. & Twinn, C. R. (1950). Observations on the bionomics of some northern mosquito species (Culicidae: Diptera).—Canad. J. Res. (D) 28 pp. 5880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horsfall, W. R. (1955). Mosquitoes, their bionomics and relation to disease.—723 pp. New York, Ronald Pr. Co.Google Scholar
Ivanova, L. V. (1962). On the natural laws of A. maculipennis distribution in villages depending on ground relief.—Proc. 11th int. Congr. Ent. 3 pp. 2629.Google Scholar
Kalmus, H. (1949). Optomotor responses in Drosophila and Musca.—Physiol. comp. Oecol. 1 (1948) pp. 127147.Google ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, J. S. (1940). The visual responses of flying mosquitoes.—Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. (A) 109 pp. 221242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, J. S. (1951). The migration of the desert locust (Schistocerca gregaria Forsk.). I. The behaviour of swarms. II. A theory of long-range migrations.—Phil. Trans. (B) 235 no. 625 pp. 163290.Google Scholar
Klassen, W. (1962). Micrometeorological observations in the North Saskatchewan River valley at Edmonton.—Tech. Circ. met. Br. Dep. Transp., Canada no. 3652, 24 pp.Google Scholar
Klassen, W.&Hocking, B. (1963). Control of Aedes dispersing along a deep river valley.—Mosq. News 23 pp. 2326.Google Scholar
Nielsen, E. T. (1958). The initial stage of migration in salt-marsh mosquitos.—Bull. ent. Res. 49 pp. 305313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, E. T. & Nielsen, A. T. (1953). Field observations on the habits of Aedes taeniorhynchus.—Ecology 34 pp. 141156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, R. L. (1949). Weather and Alaskan insects.—Rep. envir. Prot. Sect. Quartermaster clim. Res. Lab., Lawrence, Mass. no. 156, 25 pp.Google Scholar
Rudolfs, W. (1923). Observations on the relations between atmospheric conditions and the behavior of mosquitoes.—Bull. N.J. agric. Exp. Sta. no. 388, 32 pp.Google Scholar
Shemanchuk, J. A. (1958). On the bionomics of mosquitos in irrigated areas of Alberta.—M.Sc. thesis, Univ. Alberta, Edmonton.Google Scholar
Steiner, G. (1953). Zur Duftorientierung fliegender Insekten.—Naturwissenshaften 40 pp. 514515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, O. G. (1953). Micrometeorology. A study of physical processes in the lowest layers of the earth's atmosphere.—333 pp. New York, McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Uvarov, B. P. (1931). Insects and climate.—Trans. ent. Soc. Lond. 79 pp. 1247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar