Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-l82ql Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T18:58:02.274Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The flight activity of the sheep headfly, Hydrotaea irritans (Fallén) (Diptera:Muscidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

A. D. Berlyn
A. D. Berlyn
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, The West of Scotland Agricultural College, Auchincruive, Ayr KA6 5HW, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The flight activity of Hydrotaea irritans (Fall.) was investigated in western Scotland using an unbaited suction trap, a carbon-dioxide-baited suction trap and a Manitoba trap. Consistently more female flies were caught than males. Trapping experiments showed that carbon dioxide and visual or thermal stimuli influence long-range attraction and short-range orientation in host-seeking flies. The seasonal activity of adults was determined from the geometric means of catches from a suction trap baited with carbon dioxide and a Manitoba trap. H. irritans was shown to be univoltine. The activity of females was greatest in the middle of July and declined sharply in the first week of August. Male activity reached a peak at the same time as that of the females, then declined until no males were caught after mid-August. Females were most active between 10.00 and 18.00 h B.S.T., with a peak about 13.00 h. There was no variation in sex ratio during the day. Multiple regression equations of climatic and seasonal factors with log catches of flies were very similar for the two types of trap. Radiant temperature, illumination, wind speed and date were shown to influence activity of females and, with the exception of illumination, male activity also. Seasonal activity curves calculated from the regression equations were plotted for both sexes in the two traps.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 68 , Issue 2 , July 1978 , pp. 219 - 228
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon (1974). Farming the red deer.—93 pp. Edinburgh, H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Bahr, L. (1953). Summer-mastitis.—Proc. XVth int. vet. Congr., Stockholm, 849–852.Google Scholar
Burnett, A. M.& Hays, K. L. (1974). Some influences of meteorological factors on flight activity of female horse flies (Diptera: Tabanidae).—Environ. entomol. 3, 515–521.Google Scholar
Digby, P. S. B. (1958). Flight activity in the blowfly Calliphora erythrocephala, in relation to light and radiant heat, with special reference to adaptation.—J. exp. Biol. 35, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammer, O. (1941). Biological and ecological investigations on flies associated with pasturing cattle and their excrement.—Vidensk. Meddr dansk naturh. Foren. 105, 141–393.Google Scholar
Hughes, R. D., Greenham, P. M., Tyndale-Biscoe, M. & Walker, J. M. (1972). A synopsis of observations on the biology of the Australian bushfly (Musca vetustissima Walker). —J. Aust. ent. Soc. 11, 311–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, C. G. (1950). A suction trap for small airborne insects which automatically segregates the catch into successive hourly samples.—Ann. appl. Biol. 37, 80–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, C. G. (1969). Migration and dispersal of insects by flight.—763 pp. London, Methuen.Google Scholar
Kellogg, F. E. & Wright, R. H. (1962). The guidance of flying insects. V. Mosquito attraction.—Can. Ent. 94, 1009–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kettle, D. S. (1969). The biting habits of Culicoides furens (Poey) and C. barbosai Wirth & Blanton. I. The 24-h cycle, with a note on differences between collectors.—Bull. ent. Res. 59, 21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makhan'ko, E. V. (1973). Parasitism rate and structure of oral teeth in synanthropic flies of the genera Hydrotaea R.-D. and Musca L. (Diptera, Muscidae) [in Russian with English summary].—Ent. Obozr. 52, 768–781.Google Scholar
Morris, K. R. S. & Morris, M. G. (1949). The use of traps against tsetse in West Africa.—Bull. ent. Res. 39, 491–528.Google Scholar
Nielsen, B. O., Nielsen, B. M. & Christensen, O. (1971). Bidrag til plantagefluens, Hydrotaea irritans Fall., biologi (Diptera, Muscidae).—Ent. Meddr 39, 30–44.Google Scholar
Nielsen, B. O., Nielsen, B. M. & Christensen, O. (1972). Plantagefluen, Hydrotaea irritans (Fall.) på graessende kvier (Diptera, Muscidae).—Ent. Meddr 40, 151–173.Google Scholar
Norris, K. R. (1966). Notes on the ecology of the bushfly, Musca vetustissima Walk. (Diptera: Muscidae), in the Canberra district.—Aust. J. Zool. 14, 1139–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarry, D. W. (1974?). Recent work on the biology of the sheep headfly in Britain.—Proc. 7th Br. Insecticide Fungicide Conf. (1973) 1, 265–272.Google Scholar
Tarry, D. W. & Kirkwood, A. C. (1974). Hydrotaea irritans: the sheep headfly in Britain.—Br. vet. J. 130, 180–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tarry, D. W.&Kirkwood, A. C. (1976). Biology and development of the sheep headfly Hydrotaea irritans (Fall.) (Diptera, Muscidae).—Bull. ent. Res. 65, 587–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorsteinson, A. J., Bracken, G. K.&Hanec, W. (1965). The orientation behaviour of horse flies and deer flies (Tabanidae, Diptera). III. The use of traps in the study of orientation of Tabanids in the field.—Entomologia exp. appl. 8, 189–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titchener, R. N. (1975). The sheep headfly problem.—Blackface Breeders Journal 27, 29—30Google Scholar
Wilson, B. H. (1968). Reduction of Tabanid populations on cattle with sticky traps baited with dry ice.—J. econ. Ent. 61, 827–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar