Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T02:43:19.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors affecting the phenology of the first brood of the sugar-cane froghopper Aeneolamia varia saccharina (Dist.) (Homoptera, Cercopidae) in Trinidad

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

A. B. S. King
A. B. S. King
Affiliation:
Caroni Research Station, Carapichaima, Trinidad, West Indies
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The size and occurrence of the first brood of adults of Aeneolamia varia saccharina (Dist.) are examined in relation to the pattern of egg eclosion and rainfall. The proportion of eggs hatching within a month of oviposition in the laboratory (short-period eggs) decreased from over 90% in August to less than 20% in January, but the incubation periods of the remaining, long-period eggs were longest in those laid during October and November. The overall hatching distributions tended to be bimodal with most eggs hatching during the early months of the year under moist conditions at 26°C. Dry soil conditions delay eclosion, and eggs obtained from fields during the dry season and then incubated under moist conditions tended to hatch at the normally expected time of the first rains in May. The numbers of eggs expected to produce the first brood, computed from laboratory hatching data and estimates of the numbers and fecundities of froghoppers during the second, third and fourth broods, were less than the actual numbers sampled just before the first rains. There was a close relationship between the first rainfall of over one inch within 48 h and adult emergence 27 and 34 days later, and 85% of field egg populations in May had hatched and/or died by the week after the first rains. However some variation in the date of their occurrence accounted for non-synchrony of first broods over the region. The numbers of diapause eggs in fields sampled during the dry season failed to give a good predictive relationship with first brood adult populations, probably because of density dependent mortality of eggs or hatchling nymphs.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 65 , Issue 3 , October 1975 , pp. 359 - 372
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beck, S. D. (1968). Insect photoperiodism.—288 pp. London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Evans, D. E. (1971). Froghopper: biology and ecology.—A.Rep. Caroni Res. Stn Carapichaima, Trinidad, 1970–71, 44–54.Google Scholar
Evans, D. E. (1973). Studies on egg diapause in Aeneolamia varia saccharina Dist. (Homoptera, Cercopidae).—186 pp. Ph.d. Thesis, London University, 07 1972.Google Scholar
Evans, D. E. & Buxo, D. A. (1973). Insecticidal control of the sugar-cane froghopper.—Congr. int. Soc. Sug. Cane Technol. 14, 507–515.Google Scholar
Fewkes, D. W. (1961). Stool size as a factor in the sampling of sugar-cane froghopper nymph populations.—J. econ. Ent. 54, 771–772.Google Scholar
Fewkes, D. W. (1963). The effect of exposure to dry conditions on the eggs of Aeneolamia varia saccharina (Homoptera: Cercopidae).—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 56, 719–720.Google Scholar
Fewkes, D. W. (1964). Some observations on egg diapause in the Trinidad sugar cane froghopper, Aeneolamia varia saccharina (Homoptera, Cercopidae).—Entomologist. Mon. Mag. 99, 224–228.Google Scholar
Fewkes, D. W. (1966). Structure and development of the egg of Aeneolamia varia saccharina.—Rep. Tate & Lyle cent, agric. Res. Stn, Trinidad, 1965, 429–435.Google Scholar
Fewkes, D. W. & Buxo, D. A. (1967). Control of sugarcane froghopper infestations from the air.—Rep. Tate and Lyle cent. agric. Res. Stn, Trinidad, 1966, 116–148.Google Scholar
Fewkes, D. W. & Buxo, D. A. (1969). Chemical control of sugarcane froghopper (Homoptera, Cercopidae) infestations from the air in Trinidad.—Congr. int. Soc. Sug. Cane Technol. 13, 1348–1364.Google Scholar
King, A. B. S. (1975). The extraction, distribution and sampling of the eggs of the sugar-cane froghopper, Aeneolamia varia saccharina (Dist.) (Homoptera, Cercopidae).—Bull. ent. Res. 65, 157–164.Google Scholar
Messenger, P. S. & Flitters, N. E. (1959). Effect of variable temperature environments on egg development of three species of fruit flies.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 52, 191–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, G. A. & Evans, D. E. (1974). The economics of controlling froghopper (Aeneolamia varia saccharina (Dist.) (Hom., Cercopidae) on sugar-cane in Trinidad.—Bull. ent. Res. 63, 619–627.Google Scholar
Pickles, A. (1933). Entomological contributions to the study of the sugar-cane froghopper. I. The study of biotic factors of control.—Trop. Agric., Trin. 10, 222–233.Google Scholar