Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:24:02.066Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ecological and geographical variations in the siphonal index of Culex pipiens larvae (Diptera: Culicidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

E.B. Vinogradova ,
S.Ya. Reznik  and
E.S. Kuprijanova
E.B. Vinogradova*
Affiliation:
Zoological Institute, St Petersburg, Russia
S.Ya. Reznik
Affiliation:
Zoological Institute, St Petersburg, Russia
E.S. Kuprijanova
Affiliation:
Zoological Institute, St Petersburg, Russia
*
E.B. Vinogradova, Zoological Institute, St Petersburg 199034, Russia.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Culex pipiens Linnaeus is represented by two forms: the form molestus which is autogenous, stenagamous and has no reproductive diapause, and the form pipiens which is anautogenous, eurygamous and diapauses. The ecological, physiological and geographical variations in the larval siphonal index of C. pipiens (the ratio of the length of the siphon to its width at the base) was investigated using both original measurements and previously published data. In all, data were used from 259 collections from open water bodies (marshes, ditches, holes, barrels, etc.) and underground waters (house basements) in areas of Europe, Asia and part of Africa. Autogeny was studied in some cases by dissection of females. In C. pipiens the mean siphonal index was strongly correlated with ecology (water body type) and adult physiology (autogeny). In spite of high geographical and individual variation, which makes the identification of individual larvae difficult, the mean siphonal index can be used with certainty for the differentiation of populations of the two forms of C. pipiens.

Type
Review Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 86 , Issue 3 , June 1996 , pp. 281 - 287
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aksenova, A.S., Kuprijanova, E.S. & Abdullaev, K.S. (1973) On the mass breeding of anautogenous Culei pipiens in the underground reservoirs in one of seaside city of Lenkoran lowland. Meditsinskaya Parazitologiya i Parazitarnye Bolezni 42, 193–198. (In Russian with English summary.)Google Scholar
Barr, A.R. (1981) The Culex pipiens complex, pp. 123–136 in Pal, R., Kitzmiller, J.B. & Kanda, T. (Eds) Cytogenetics and genetics of vectors. Elsevier Biomedical.Google Scholar
Brogdon, W.G. (1981) Use of the siphonal index to separate Culex pipiens subspecies and hybrids. Mosquito Systematics 13, 129–137.Google Scholar
Brogdon, W.G. (1984) The siphonal index. II. Relative abundance of Culex species, subspecies and intermediates in Memphis, Tennessee. Mosquito Systematics 16, 153–161.Google Scholar
Christophers, S.R. (1951) Note on morphological characters differentiating Culex pipiens L. from Culex molestus Forskål and on the status of these forms. Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 102, 372–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedorov, V.G. (1946) Discovery of Culex molestus Forsk. in Leningrad. Meditsinskaya Parazitologiya i Parazitarnye Bolezni 15, 58–68. (In Russian with English summary.)Google Scholar
Harbach, R.E. (1988) The mosquitoes of the subgenus Culex in south-western Asia and Egypt (Diptera, Culicidae). Contributions of the American Entomological Institute 24 (1) 240 pp.Google Scholar
Harbach, R.E., Harrison, B.A. & Gad, A.M. (1984) Culex (Culex) molestus Forskål (Diptera: Culicidae): neotype designation, description, variation, and taxonomic status. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 86, 521–542.Google Scholar
Harbach, R.E., Dahl, C. & White, C.B. (1985) Culex (Culex) pipiens Linnaeus (Diptera: Culicidae): concepts, type designations, and description. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 87, 1–24.Google Scholar
Ishii, T. (1983) On the Culex pipiens group in Japan. III. A historical review of its research. 5. Review of the larval characters (3). Journal of Science, University of Tokushima 16, 27–109. (In Japanese, with English abstract.)Google Scholar
Ishii, T. (1991) Integrated study on the Culex pipiens complex. Species diversion in the Culex pipiens complex. Akaieka Newsletter 14, 5–40.Google Scholar
Ivnitsky, S.B., Tamarina, N.A. & Kreslavsky, A.G. (1984) A variation in the number of dentes in the siphon ridge in a laboratory population of Aedes caspius caspius with the special reference to their ecology. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 63, 687–695. (In Russian with English summary.)Google Scholar
Jobling, B. (1938) On two subspecies of Culex pipiens L. (Diptera). Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 87, 193–216.Google Scholar
Kreslavsky, A.G. & Derviz, N.V. (1987) Ecological grounds of maintaining variability of the number of sternopleural bristles in Drosophila melanogaster populations. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 66, 724–734. (In Russian with English summary.)Google Scholar
Lewis, D.J. (1945) Observations on the distribution and taxonomy of Culicidae (Diptera) in the Sudan. Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 95, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopatin, O.E. (1986) On the biology of the mosquito Culex pipiens L. (Diptera, Culicidae). Trudy Instituta Zoologii Academii Nauk Kazakhskoy SSR 43, 61–71. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Marshall, J.F. & Staley, J. (1937) Some notes regarding the morphological and biological differentiation of Culex pipiens Linnaeus and Culex molestus Forskål (Diptera, Culicidae). Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society of London, Series A 12, 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, J.F. (1938) The British mosquitoes. 341 pp. British Museum, London.Google Scholar
Mihalyi, F. & Zoltai, N. (1956) Contributions to the occurrence of Culex pipiens molestus in Hungary. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 2, 263–268.Google Scholar
Monchadsky, A.S. (1951) The larvae of blood-sucking mosquitoes from the USSR and adjacent countries (Culicinae). 290 pp. Moscow, Izdatel'stvo Akademii Nauk. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Nudelman, S., Galun, R., Kitron, U. & Spielman, A. (1988) Physiological characteristics of Culex pipiens populations in the Middle East. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 2, 161–169.Google Scholar
Ostroushko, T.S. (1989) Ecology and the distribution of the mosquitoes Culex pipiens L. in Komi ASSR. Trudy Komi Nauchnogo Centra Ural'skogo Otdeleniya AN SSSR 100, 94–101. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Scherpner, P.G. (1960) Zur Ecölogie und Biologie der Stechmücken des Gebietes von Frankfurt am Main (Diptera, Culicidae). Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum Berlin 36, 49–101.Google Scholar
Sharkov, A.A. (1978) The discovery of Culex pipiens molestus Forskal in Murmansk. Meditsinskaya Parazitologiya i Parazitarnye Bolezni 47, 112–113. (In Russian with English summary.)Google Scholar
Tsherbina, V.P. (1967) On the anthropophily of Culex pipiens L. (Diptera, Culicidae) in North Caucasus, pp. 58–74 in Narchuk, E.P. (Ed.) Chteniya pamyati N.A. Kholodkovskogo 1964–1965. Leningrad, Nauka. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Urbanelli, S., Cianti, R., Petrarca, V., Coluzzi M, & Sabatini, L. (1981). Adaptations to the urban environment in the mosquito Culex pipiens (Diptera, Culicidae). pp. 305–316in Moroni, A., Ravera, O. & Anelli, A. (Eds) Ecologia, Zara, Parma, Italy. (In Italian.)Google Scholar
Valentjuk, E.I., Soloucha, B.V. & Ermakov, A.A. (1980) Threshold estimations of the siphonal index and the fecundity in Culex pipiens. Zhurnal Obshchey Biologii 41, 596–600. (In Russian with English summary.)Google Scholar
Vinogradova, E.B. (1961) On the biological isolation between the subspecies of Culex pipiens (Diptera, Culicidae). Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie 40, 63–75. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Vinogradova, E.B. (1965) The morphological and biological characteristics of some natural populations of blood-sucking mosquitoes Culex pipiens (Diptera, Culicidae) on the territory of USSR. Trudy Zoologicheskogo Institutes AN SSSR 36, 31–57. (In Russian.)Google Scholar
Vinogradova, E.B. (1966) Blood-sucking mosquitoes of the complex Culex pipiens L. (Diptera, Culicidae), their practical significance, taxonomy and biology. Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie 45, 241–257. (In Russian with English summary.)Google Scholar
Vinogradova, E.B. (1968) On some intermediate forms of bloodsucking mosquitoes of the complex Culex pipiens L. (Diptera, Culicidae). Vol. 1. pp. 169–183 in Vorontsov, N.N. (Ed.) Problems of evolution. Novosibirsk, Nauka.Google Scholar
Vinogradova, E.B. (1992) Morphology, ecology and control of the Culex pipiens complex in USSR. Akaieka Newsletter 15, 1–10.Google Scholar
Vinogradova, E.B. & Fomenko, R.B. (1968) The morphological and biological peculiarities of Culex pipiens L. (Diptera, Culicidae) in Uzbekistan. Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie 47, 241–257. (In Russian with English summary.)Google Scholar
Vinogradova, E.B. & Oda, T. (1990) To the knowledge of the mosquito Culex pipiens L. (Diptera, Culicidae) in Leningrad province. Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie 49, 782–785. (In Russian with English summary.)Google Scholar
Vinogradova, E.B. & Reznik, S.Ya. (1994) Siphonal index of the larvae of mosquitoes Culex pipiens L. (Diptera, Culicidae) from Russia and neighboring countries: variability and using for the forms identification. Parazitologiya 28, 309–317. (In Russian with English summary.)Google Scholar
Vinogradskaya, O.N., Oktyabrskaya, T.A. & Derevitskaya, V.V. (1967) On morphology, taxonomy and biology of the Moscow countryside population of Culex pipiens L. Meditsinskaya Parazitologiya i Parazitarnye Bolezni 36, 224–231. (In Russian with English summary.)Google Scholar