Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T14:46:31.779Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Different emergence phenology of European grapevine moth (Lobesia botrana, Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) on six varieties of grapes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2013

D. Thiéry ,
K. Monceau  and
J. Moreau
D. Thiéry*
Affiliation:
INRA, ISVV, UMR 1065 Santé et Agroécologie du Vignoble, F-33883 Villenave d'Ornon, France Université de Bordeaux, ISVV, UMR 1065 Santé et Agroécologie du Vignoble, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, CS 20032, F-33882 Villenave d'Ornon, France
K. Monceau
Affiliation:
INRA, ISVV, UMR 1065 Santé et Agroécologie du Vignoble, F-33883 Villenave d'Ornon, France Université de Bordeaux, ISVV, UMR 1065 Santé et Agroécologie du Vignoble, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, CS 20032, F-33882 Villenave d'Ornon, France
J. Moreau
Affiliation:
Université de Bourgogne, Equipe Ecologie Evolutive, UMR 6282 Biogéosciences, 6 Bd Gabriel, F-21000 Dijon, France
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: +33 5 57 12 26 21 Phone: +33 5 57 12 26 18 E-mail: denis.thiery@bordeaux.inra.fr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The phenology of insect emergence affects reproductive success and is especially critical in short-lived species. An increasing number of studies have documented the effects of thermal and other climatic variations and of unpredictable habitats on the timing of adult insect emergence within and between populations and years. Numerous interacting factors may affect the phenology of adult emergence. Host-plant quality and availability is a key factor that has been largely neglected in studies of the phenology of phytophagous insects. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of host plant characteristics on the rate of larval growth and the pattern of emergence in a wild population of Lobesia botrana (European grapevine moth), a significant pest in European vineyards. The phenology of emergence differed significantly among the six tested varieties of grapes. The percentage of bunches harboring pupae was similar among the different grape varieties, and the total number of pupae collected was similar to the number of emerging adults per bunch. Among the six varieties of grapes, 0–25 pupae were produced on each bunch. Each of the grape varieties had a single wave of emergence, in which males emerged before females, but their emergence phenology differed significantly in Chardonnay, Chasselas, and Pinot grapes. Both genders had extended durations of emergence in Merlot grapes. Together, the present results show that the characteristics of the grape host plant affect the emergence phenology of L. botrana.

Keywords

phytophagous insecthost plantemergenceprotandrygrape pest
Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 104 , Issue 3 , June 2014 , pp. 277 - 287
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainseba, B., Picart, D. & Thiéry, D. (2011) An innovative multistage, physiologically structured, population model to understand the European grapevine moth dynamics. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 382, 34–46.Google Scholar
Benrey, B. & Denno, R.F. (1997) The slow growth-high mortality hypothesis: a test using the cabbage butterfly. Ecology 78, 987–999.Google Scholar
Bulmer, M.G. (1983) Models for the evolution of protandry in insects. Journal of Theoretical Biology 35, 195–206.Google Scholar
Calabrese, J.M. & Fagan, W.F. (2004) Lost in time, lonely, and single: reproductive asynchrony and the Allee effect. American Naturalist 164, 25–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carvalho, M.C., Queiroz, P.C.D. & Ruszczyk, A. (1998) Protandry and female size-fecundity variation in the tropical butterfly Brassolis sophorae . Oecologia 116, 98–102.Google Scholar
Chuche, J. & Thiéry, D. (2012) Egg incubation temperature differently affects female and male hatching dynamics and larval fitness in a leafhopper. Ecology and Evolution 2, 732–739.Google Scholar
Cizek, L., Fric, Z. & Konvicka, M. (2006) Host plant defences and voltinism in European butterflies. Ecological Entomology 31, 337–344.Google Scholar
Curry, G.L. & Feldman, R.M. (1987) Mathematical Foundations of Population Dynamics. College Station Texas, Texas A and M University Press.Google Scholar
Cushman, J.H., Boggs, C., Weiss, S.B., Harvey, A., Murphy, D.D. & Ehrlich, P.R. (1994) Estimating female reproductive success in a threatened butterfly: influence of emergence time and host plant phenology. Oecologia 99, 194–200.Google Scholar
Danforth, B.N. (1999) Emergence dynamics and bet hedging in a desert bee, Perdita portalis . Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 266, 1985–1994.Google Scholar
Danks, H.V. (ed.) (1994) Insect Life-cycle Polymorphism: Theory, Evolution and Ecological Consequences for Seasonality and Diapause Control. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Danks, H.V. (2002) The range of insect dormancy responses. European Journal of Entomology 99, 127–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellwood, E.R., Diez, J.M., Ibanez, I., Primack, R., Kobori, H., Higushi, H. & Silnader, J.A. (2012) Disentangling the paradox of insect phenology: are temporal trends reflecting the response to warming? Oecologia 168, 1161–1171.Google Scholar
Fagerström, T. & Wiklund, C. (1982) Why do males emerge before females? Protandry as a mating strategy in male and female butterflies. Oecologia 52, 164–166.Google Scholar
Feder, J.L. (1995) The effects of parasitoids on sympatric host races of Rhagoletis pomonella (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ecology 76, 801–813.Google Scholar
Feder, J.L., Hunt, T.A. & Bush, L. (1993) The effects of climate, host plant phenology and host fidelity on the genetics of apple and hawthorn infesting races of Rhagoletis pomonella . Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 69, 117–135.Google Scholar
Fermaud, M. (1998) Cultivar susceptibility of grape berry clusters to larvae of Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 91, 974–980.Google Scholar
Forrest, J. & Miller-Rushing, A.J. (2010) Toward a synthetic understanding of the role of phenology in ecology and evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 365, 3101–3122.Google Scholar
Gabel, B. & Roehrich, R. (1995) Sensitivity of grapevine phenological stages to larvae of European grapevine moth Lobesia botrana Den. & Schiff. Journal of Applied Entomology 119, 127–130.Google Scholar
Gabel, B. & Thiéry, D. (1996) Oviposition response of Lobesia botrana females to long chain free fatty acids and esters from its eggs. Journal of Chemical Ecology 22, 161–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goulson, D. (1993) The evolutionary significance of bimodal emergence in the butterfly, Maniola jurtina (Lepidoptera: Satyrinae) (L.). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 49, 127–139.Google Scholar
Groman, J.D. & Pellmyr, O. (2000) Rapid evolution and specialization following host colonization in a yucca moth. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 13, 223–236.Google Scholar
Haggstrom, H. & Larsson, S. (1995) Slow larval growth on a suboptimal willow results in high predation mortality in the leaf beetle Galerucella lineola . Oecologia 104, 308–315.Google Scholar
Honek, A. (1993) Intraspecific variation in body size and fecundity in insects: a general relationship. Oikos 66, 483–492.Google Scholar
Hopper, K.R. (1999) Risk-spreading and bet-hedging in insect population biology. Annual Review of Entomology 44, 535–560.Google Scholar
Maher, N. & Thiéry, D. (2004) A bioassay to evaluate the activity of chemical stimuli from grape berries on the oviposition of Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 94, 27–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maher, N. & Thiéry, D. (2006) Daphne gnidium, the possible native host plant of the European grapevine moth Lobesia botrana, stimulates its oviposition. Is a host shift relevant? Chemoecology 16, 135–144.Google Scholar
Maher, N., Jolivet, M. & Thiéry, D. (2001) Préférence de ponte de l'eudémis, Lobesia botrana (Lépidoptère, Tortricidae) entre différents cépages de vigne: influence de l'information chimique à la surface des baies. IOBC/WPRS Bulletin 24, 103–108.Google Scholar
Maher, N., Thiéry, D. & Städler, E. (2006) Oviposition by Lobesia botrana is stimulated by sugars detected by contact chemoreceptors. Physiological Entomology 31, 14–22.Google Scholar
Moreau, J., Arruego, X., Benrey, B. & Thiéry, D. (2006a) Parts of Vitis vinifera berries cv. Cabernet Sauvignon modifies larval and female fitness in the European grapevine moth. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 119, 93–99.Google Scholar
Moreau, J., Benrey, B. & Thiéry, D. (2006b) Assessing larval food quality for phytophagous insects: are facts as simple as it appears? Functional Ecology 20, 592–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreau, J., Benrey, B. & Thiéry, D. (2006c) Grape variety affects larval performance and also female reproductive performance of the European grapevine moth (Lobesia botrana). Bulletin of Entomological Research 96, 205–212.Google Scholar
Moreau, J., Thiéry, D., Troussard, J.P. & Benrey, B. (2007) Grape variety affects female but also male reproductive success in wild European grapevine moths. Ecological Entomology 32, 747–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreau, J., Rahme, J., Benrey, B. & Thiéry, D. (2008) Larval host plant origin modifies the adult oviposition preference of the female European grapevine moth Lobesia botrana . Naturwissenschaften 95, 317–324.Google Scholar
Nylin, S. & Janz, N. (1993) Oviposition preference and larval performance in Polygonia c-album (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): the choice between bad and worse. Ecological Entomology 18, 394–398.Google Scholar
Pieri, P. & Fermaud, M. (2005) Effects of defoliation on temperature and wetness of grapevine berries. 7th International Symposium on Grapevine Physiology and Biotechnology, University of California, Davis, CA; Acta Horticultura 689, 109–116.Google Scholar
Raven, C.P. (1961) Oogenesis: The Storage of Developmental Information. Oxford, Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, available online at http://www.R-project.org (accessed 19 May 2012).Google Scholar
Reznick, D., Nunney, L. & Tessier, A. (2000) Big houses, big cars, superfleas and the costs of reproduction. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15, 421–425.Google Scholar
Rodriguez-del-Bosque, L.A., Smith, J.W. & Browning, H.W. (1989) Development and life-fertility tables for Diatraea lineolata (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) at constant temperatures. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 82, 459–469.Google Scholar
Roehrich, R. & Boller, E. (1991) Tortricids in vineyards. pp. 507–514 in Van der Gesst, L.P.S. & Evenhuis, H.H. (Eds) Tortricid Pests, Their Biology Natural Enemies and Control. Amsterdam, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Savopoulou-Soultani, M., Stavridis, D.G. & Tzanakakis, M.E. (1990) Development and reproduction of Lobesia botrana on vine and olive inflorescences. Entomologia Hellenica 8, 29–35.Google Scholar
Savopoulou-Soultani, M., Stavridis, D.G., Vassiliou, A., Stafilidis, J.E. & Iraklidis, I. (1994) Response of Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) to levels of sugar and protein in artificial diets. Journal of Economic Entomology 87, 84–90.Google Scholar
Scriber, J.M. (1981) Sequential diets, metabolic costs and growth of Spodoptera eridania feeding on dill, lima bean, and cabbage. Oecologia 51, 375–380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharon, R., Zahavi, T., Soroker, V. & Harari, A.R. (2009) The effect of grape vine cultivars on Lobesia botrana (Lepidotpera: Tortricidae) population levels. Journal of Pest Science 82, 187–193.Google Scholar
Sileshi, G. (2006) Selecting the right statistical model for analysis of insect count data by using information theoretic measures. Bulletin of Entomological Research 96, 479–488.Google Scholar
Singer, M.C. (1972) Complex components of habitat suitability within a butterfly colony. Science 176, 75–77.Google Scholar
Slansky, F. & Scriber, J.M. (1985) Food consumption and utilization. pp. 87–163 in Kerkut, G.A. & Gilbert, L.I. (Eds) Comprehensive Insect Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology. Oxford, Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, F. (1981) Ecology and evolution of physiological time in insects. American Naturalist 117, 1–23.Google Scholar
Thiéry, D. (2005) Vers de la grappe, les connaître pour s'en protéger. Bordeaux, France, Vigne et Vins Publishers.Google Scholar
Thiéry, D. (2008). Les tordeuses nuisibles au vignoble. In Les ravageurs de la Vigne. France, Férét Publisher.Google Scholar
Thiéry, D. (2011) Gaps in knowledge for modern integrated protection in viticulture: lessons from controlling grape berry moths. IOBC/WPRS Bulletin 67, 305–311.Google Scholar
Thiéry, D. & Moreau, J. (2005) Relative performance of European grapevine moth (Lobesia botrana) on grapes and other hosts. Oecologia 143, 548–557.Google Scholar
Thiéry, D., Gabel, B., Farkas, P. & Pronier, V. (1992) Identification of an oviposition regulating pheromone in the European Grapevine Moth, Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: tortricidae). Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (Experientia) 48, 697–699.Google Scholar
Thomas, A.W. (1989) Food consumption and utilization by 6th-instar larvae of spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana: a comparison on three Picea (spruce) species. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 52, 205–214.Google Scholar
Thomas, Y., Bethenod, M.T., Pelozuelo, L., Frérot, B. & Bourguet, D. (2003) Genetic isolation between two sympatric host-plant races of the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis Hubner. I. Sex pheromone, moth emergence timing and parasitism. Evolution 57, 261–273.Google Scholar
Tikkanen, O.P., Niemela, P. & Keranen, J. (2000) Growth and development of a generalist insect herbivore, Operophtera brumata, on original and alternative host plants. Oecologia 122, 539–536.Google Scholar
Torres-Vila, L.M., Stockel, J. & Roehrich, R. (1995) Le potentiel reproducteur et ses variables biotiques associées chez le mâle de l'Eudémis de la vigne Lobesia botrana . Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 77, 105–119.Google Scholar
Torres-Vila, L.M., Rodriguez-Molina, M.C., Roehrich, R. & Stockel, J. (1999) Vine phenological stage during larval feeding affects male and female reproductive output of Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 89, 549–556.Google Scholar
Vega, G.L. & Grundy, S.M. (1993) Two patterns of LDL metabolism in normotriglyceridemic patients with hypoalphalipoproteinemia. Arteriosclerosis and Thrombosis 13, 579–589.Google Scholar
Visser, M.E. & Holleman, L.J.M. (2001) Warmer springs disrupt the synchrony of oak and winter moth phenology. Proceeding of the Royal Society of London B 268, 289–294.Google Scholar
Weiss, S.B. & Weiss, A.D. (1998) Landscape-level phenology of a threatened butterfly: a GIS-based modelling approach. Ecosystems 1, 299–309.Google Scholar
Weiss, S.B., Murphy, D.D., Ehrlich, P.R. & Metzler, C.F. (1993) Adult emergence phenology in checkerspot butterflies: the effect of macroclimate, topoclimate, and population history. Oecologia 96, 261–270.Google Scholar
Wiklund, C. & Fagerström, T. (1977) Why do males emerge before females? Oecologia 31, 153–158.Google Scholar
Wiklund, C., Kaitala, A., Lindfors, V. & Abenius, J. (1993) Polyandry and its effect on female reproduction in the green-veined white butterfly (Pieris napi L.). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 33, 25–33.Google Scholar
Willmer, P.G. (1982) Microclimate and the environmental physiology of insects. Advances in Insect Physiology 16, 1–57.Google Scholar
Wissinger, S., Steinmetz, J., Alexander, S. & Brown, W. (2004) Larval cannibalism, time constraints, and adult fitness in caddisflies that inhabit temporary wetlands. Oecologia 138, 39–47.Google Scholar
Wood, T.K., Olmstead, K.L. & Guttman, S.I. (1990) Insect phenology mediated by host-plant water relations. Evolution 44, 629–636.Google Scholar
Xuéreb, A. & Thiéry, D. (2006) Does natural larval parasitism of Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) vary between years, generation, density of the host and vine cultivar? Bulletin of Entomological Research 96, 105–110.Google Scholar
Zhu, L., Zhang, Y., Deng, J., Li, H. & Lu, J. (2012) Phenolic concentrations and antioxidant properties of wines made from north American grapes grown in China. Molecules 17, 3304–3323.Google Scholar