Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T22:30:40.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Behavioural responses of the haematophagous bug Triatoma infestans (Klug) (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) to visual stimuli

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

J. P. Ward  and
L. H. Finlayson
J. P. Ward
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Comparative Physiology, University of Birmingham, P.O. Box 363, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
L. H. Finlayson*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Comparative Physiology, University of Birmingham, P.O. Box 363, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
*
*Correspondence to Professor L. H. Finlayson.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Behavioural responses of Triatoma infestans (Klug) to visual stimuli were analysed using a novel method involving remote monitoring of individual tethered bugs. T. infestans showed negative phototactic behaviour and a reduction in activity in response to a directional white light stimulus at an intensity of 1·2 /µW/cm2. A lower intensity of white light (0·6 µW/cm2) elicited a similar negative phototaxis but failed to induce a significant reduction in activity. The response to green light at 0·6 µW/cm2 was similar to that towards white light at 1·2 µW/cm2. Blue light did not induce any behavioural responses, whereas red light induced a significant reduction in activity at the lower intensity but did not affect phototaxis. Infrared radiation did not induce any significant behavioural effects, but there was an indication that T. infestans can detect near infrared radiation (750 nm). The activity response to the higher intensity white light appeared to be mediated primarily by the compound eyes. The dorsal ocelli, however, were involved in the directing of the phototactic response. T. infestans responded to moving objects by a marked reduction in activity. Slowly moving objects induced a following response, whereas more quickly moving objects did not.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 72 , Issue 3 , September 1982 , pp. 357 - 366
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batschelet, E. (1965). Statistical methods for the analysis of problems in animal orientation and certain biological rhythms.—A.I.B.S. monograph.Google Scholar
Brady, J. (1972). The visual responsiveness of the tsetse fly Glossina morsitans Westw. (Glossinidae) to moving objects: the effects of hunger, sex, host odour and stimulus characteristics.—Bull. ent. Res. 62, 257–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkhardt, D. (1964). Colour discrimination in insects.—Adv. Insect Physiol. 2, 131–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, R. F. (1969). The insects. Structure and function.–819 pp. London, English Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, G. S. & Gunn, D. L. (1961). The orientation of animals.—New York, Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Goodman, L. J. (1970). The structure and function of the insect dorsal ocellus.—Adv. Insect Physiol. 7, 97–195.Google Scholar
Haridass, E. T. & Ananthakrishnan, T. N. (1980). Model for the predatory behaviour of some reduviids from southern India (Insecta-Heteroptera-Reduviidae).—Proc. Indian Acad. Sci., Anim. Sci. 89, 387–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jander, R. & Barry, C. K. (1968). Die phototaktische Gegenkopplung von Stirnocellen und Facettenaugen in der Phototropotaxis der Heuschrecken und Grillen (Saltatoptera: Locusta migratoria und Gryllus bimaculatus).—Z. vergl. Physiol. 57, 432–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. R. (1976). Positive phototaxis of adult alfalfa weevils to visible and near-infrared radiation.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 69, 21–25.Google Scholar
Schofield, C. J. (1974). The behavioural biology of the Triatominae (Hemiptera; Reduviidae) with special reference to intra-specific communication mechanisms.—Ph.D. thesis, Univ. London.Google Scholar
Schofield, C. J. (1979). The behaviour of Triatominae (Hemiptera: Reduviidae): a review.—Bull. ent. Res. 69, 363–379.Google Scholar
Ward, J. P. (1981). A comparison of the behavioural responses of the haematophagous bug, Triatoma infestans, to synthetic homologues of two naturally occurring chemicals (n-and iso-butyric acid).—Physiol. Entomol. 6, 325–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiesinger, D. (1956). Die Bedeutung der Umweltfaktoren für den Saugakt von Triatoma infestans.—Acta trop. 13, 97–141.Google ScholarPubMed
Wigglesworth, V. B. & Gillett, J. D. (1934). The function of the antennae in Rhodnius prolixus (Hemiptera) and the mechanism of orientation to the host.—J. exp. Biol. 11, 120–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar