Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-2l2gl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-31T13:04:13.217Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Behaviour of the Larvae of Tsetse-Flies before Pupation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

D. J. Lewis
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.

Summary and conclusions

Observations in the laboratory on the larva of Glossina tachinoides and G. submorsitans show that in both species it is slow in crawling and burrowing and often cannot burrow at all. It penetrates coarse sand more readily than fine, and fine sand than wood ash, and burrows easily in fine sand with pebbles. In nature it probably always burrows eventually, unless it is attacked by predators or parasites to which its behaviour renders it vulnerable.

Previous field work indicates that the depth to which the larvae burrow influences the effect of predators and parasites and sometimes of solar radiation on the puparia. Records of breeding-places suggest that larvae often crawl over hard soil to reach suitable places in which to burrow, and that unless the female fly, before depositing a larva, carefully selects such a place, the mortality due to other insects is probably high.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1934

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Austen, E. E. & Hegh, E. 1922. Tsetse-flies, their characteristics, distribution and bionomics. London.Google Scholar
Blacklock, G. & Thompson, M. G. 1923. A Study of the Tumbu-fly, Cordylobia anthropophaga Grünberg, in Sierra Leone.—Ann. Trop. Med. Parasit. 18 pp. 443510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buxton, P. A. & Lewis, D. J. 1934. Climate and Tsetse Flies: laboratory studies upon G. submorsitans and tachinoides.—In the press.Google Scholar
Croveri, P. 1919. Osservazioni sulla biologia della Glossina pallidipes della Somalia Italiana e sulla trasmissione agli animali domestici della Tripanosi detta “ Ghendi.”Ann. d'Igiene, 29 pp. 432447.Google Scholar
Duke, H. L. 1918. Some observations on the bionomics of Glossina palpalis on the Islands of Victoria Nyanza.—Bull. Ent. Res. 9 pp. 263270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, W. F. 1920. Investigations into the bionomics of Glossina palpalis.—Bull. Ent. Res. 10 pp. 347463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewitt, C. G. 1914. The House-fly, Musca domestica Linn. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. B. & Lloyd, Li. 1922. First Report of the Tsetse-fly Investigation in the Northern Provinces of Nigeria.—Bull. Ent. Res. 13 pp. 373396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keilin, D. 1916. Sur la viviparité chez les Diptères et sur les larves de Diptères vivipares.—Arch. Zool. exp. gén. 55 pp. 393415.Google Scholar
Kinghorn, A. 1911. Notes on the preliminary stages of Glossina morsitans, Westw.—Bull. Ent. Res. 2 pp. 291300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamborn, W. A. 1916. Second report on Glossina investigations in Nyasaland.—Bull. Ent. Res. 6 pp. 249265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, T. A. M. 1933. The ecology of Glossina morsitans Westw., and two possible methods for its destruction—Part II.—Bull. Ent. Res. 24 pp. 163195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newstead, R. 1924. Guide to the Study of Tsetse flies. Liverpool.Google Scholar
Potts, W. H. 1933. Observations on Glossina morsitans in East Africa.—Bull. Ent. Res. 24 pp. 293300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roubaud, E. 1909. La Glossina palpalis, R.-Desv. Paris.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. J. 1917. Bionomics of Tsetse and other parasitological notes in the Gold Coast.—Bull. Ent. Res. 8 pp. 193214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuhlmann, F. 1907. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Tsetsefliege.—Arb. Kaiserl. Gesund. 26 pp. 301383.Google Scholar
Swynnerton, C. F. M. 1920. An examination of the Tsetse problem in North Mossurise, Portuguese East Africa.—Bull. Ent. Res. 11 pp. 315385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar