Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T08:31:46.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Use of crop residues and agro-industrial by-products in ruminant production systems in developing countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

M. C. N. Jayasuriya
M. C. N. Jayasuriya*
Affiliation:
PO Box 30750, Capital City, Lilongwe 3, Malawi
Get access

Abstract

Ruminant production systems in developing countries could be classified into three categories: the extensive systems, systems incorporating arable cropping and systems integrated with tree cropping. Systems have evolved in response to the agro-ecological environment, the availability and type of land, nature of cropping patterns, frequency and intensity of cropping, area of uncultivated land and animal species and animal numbers.

Smallholder livestock farmers in most developing countries appear to have adopted a mixed system that incorporates the traditional extensive system and the system that combines arable cropping with livestock. Both in Africa and in Asia, livestock production is an important component of traditional agriculture, complementing arable cropping. Livestock utilize existing food resources such as communal grazing lands which are marginal for arable cropping, crop residues and agro-industrial by-products. Besides supplying meat and milk, organic manure and draft power, livestock are an investment and an insurance against crop failure.

Crop residues and agro-industrial by-products are a major source of nutrients for ruminant livestock in developing countries, especially during periods of fodder shortage. Despite the large research effort on upgrading crop residues in recent years, there has been little improvement in the utilization of crop residues in developing countries. Reasons for this are many but include, the absence of detailed production patterns of crop residues within countries, including when and where they are produced, the difficulties of transporting and storing crop residues, inappropriate technology and the near absence of extension services.

Both in the African and Asian continents, smallholder farmers who rear livestock for supplementary income are rather reluctant to change their traditional practices, when new technologies call for extra labour, time and capital, since the methods may be too demanding in relation to the benefit produced. The more likely application of any new technology will be with larger-scale operations where benefits are clearer and sufficiently large to warrant the extra efforts.

Type
Research Article
Information
BSAP Occasional Publication , Volume 16: Animal Production in Developing Countries , 1993 , pp. 47 - 55
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Devendra, C. 1981. Non-conventional feed resources in Asia and the Far East. Food and Agriculture Organization — APHCA, Bangkok.Google Scholar
Devendra, C. 1989. Ruminant production systems in developing countries: resource utilization. In Feeding strategies for improving productivity of ruminant livestock in developing countries. Panel proceedings series. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization. 1982. Livestock production: a world perspective. The state of food and agriculture, world review, FAO Agriculture Services, no. 15. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization. 1989. FAO production year book 1989. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization/United Nations Development Programme. 1990. Malawi: agriculture, forestry and natural resources sector review. Programming Mission Report. FAO/UNDP, Malawi.Google Scholar
Hartley, R. D., Deschard, G., Keene, A. S. and Mason, V. C. 1984. Changes in the chemical constitution of cereal straw and poor quality hay during upgrading. In Improvements in the nutritive value of crops and by-products by chemical or biological treatment. Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food, London.Google Scholar
International Development Research Centre. 1988. Crop and animal production systems programme. International Development Research Centre, Canada.Google Scholar
Jalaludin, S. 1989. Ruminant feeding systems in southeast Asia. In Feeding strategies for improving productivity of ruminant livestock in developing countries. Panel proceedings series. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Kossila, V. L. 1984. Location and potential feed use. In Straw and other fibrous by-products as feed (ed. Sundstol, F. and Owen, E.). Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Munthali, J. T., Zimba, A. W. C. and Kamwanja, L. A. 1990. Effects of urea treated maize stover on the performance of lactating crossbred dairy cows. In Annual technical report, dairy/beef production systems (Malawi). University of Malawi and Ministry of Agriculture, Lilongwe, Malawi.Google Scholar
Nkhonjera, L., Agymang, K. and Butterworth, M. H. 1988. Performance of cattle stall-fed for beef in Malawi. Tropical Animal Health and Production 20:155–160.Google Scholar
Owen, E. 1980. Agricultural wastes as feedstuffs. In Handbook of organic waste conversion (ed. Bewick, W. M. M.), Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.Google Scholar
Owen, E. and Jayasuriya, M. C. N. 1989. Use of crop residues as animal feeds in developing countries. Research and Development in Agriculture 6:129–138.Google Scholar
Pearce, G. R. 1984. Factors contributing to variation in the nutritive value of fibrous agricultural residues. In The utilization of fibrous agricultural residues as animal feeds (ed. Doyle, P. T.). School of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Perdok, H. B., Thamotharam, M., Blom, J. J., Born, H. van der and Van Veluw, C. 1982. Practical experiences with urea-ensiled straw in Sri Lanka. In Maximum livestock production from minimum land (ed. Preston, T. R., Davies, C. H., Dolberg, F., Hage, M. and Saadullah, M.), Proceedings of the third seminar, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Joyedebpur and Mymensingh Agricultural University.Google Scholar
Preston, T. R. and Leng, R. A. 1987. Matching ruminant production systems with available resources in the tropics and sub-tropics. Penumbul Books, Armidale.Google Scholar
Reed, J. D., Tedia, A. and Kebede, Y. 1987. Phenolics, fibre and fibre digestibility in bird resistant and non-bird resistant sorghum varieties. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 39:113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sannasgala, K. and Jayasuriya, M. C. N. 1984. Effects of physiological and morphological characteristics on the chemical composition and in situ digestibility of different varieties of rice straw. In The utilization of fibrous agricultural residues as animal feeds (ed. Doyle, P. T.). School of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Vandermaele, F. P. 1977. The role of animal production in world agriculture. World Animal Review 21:2–5.Google Scholar
Wanapat, M., Sriwattonasombat, P. and Chanthai, S. 1984. The utilization of diets containing untreated rice straw, urea-ammonia treated rice straw and urea-ammonia treated rice straw and water hyacinth. In The utilization of fibrous agricultural residues as animal feeds (ed. Doyle, P. T.). School of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Wide, G. V. 1987. Practical utilization of agro-industrial by-products in a feedlot in Malawi. In Utilization of agricultural by-products as livestock feeds in Africa. Proceedings of the African Research Network for Agricultural By-products (ARNAB), Blantyre, Malawi, 1986. International Livestock Centre for Africa. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar