Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-09T14:25:06.170Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pig housing and the environment — future perspectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

P. R. English
P. R. English
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, University of Aberdeen, 581 King St., Aberdeen AB9 1UD
Get access

Abstract

In relation to desirable future developments in the provision of suitable climatic conditions and accommodation for the pig, consideration has been given to the established physiological and behavioural requirements and the extent to which current systems fail to cater for these needs. Suggestions are made for improving the provisions for pigs at various stages of the production process including breeding, pregnancy, parturition and early lactation, weaning and in the growing-finishing period. In formulating future perspectives for accommodating pigs at all stages of the production process, an attempt has been made to maintain an appropriate balance between the objectives of catering more effectively for the requirements of the pig, acceptability from the welfare aspect of both pigs and stockmen, ease of management and cost-effectiveness.

Type
Research Article
Information
BSAP Occasional Publication , Volume 11: Pig Housing and the Environment , January 1987 , pp. 117 - 125
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

British Society of Animal Production. 1980. Summary of discussions and recommendations of the Pig Welfare Consultative Panel. British Society of Animal Production, Penicuik.Google Scholar
Bruce, J. M. 1981. Ventilation and temperature control criteria for pigs. In Environmental Aspects of Housing for Animal Production (ed. Clark, J. J.), pp. 197–216. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, A. J. and English, P. R. 1983. A comparison of the activity and behaviour of dry sows in different housing and penning systems. Animal Production 36: 531–532 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Close, W. H. 1987. The influence of the thermal environment on the productivity of pigs. In Pig Housing and the Environment (ed. Smith, A. T. and Lawrence, T. L. J.), pp. 9–24. Occasional Publication, British Society of Animal Production, No. 11.Google Scholar
English, P. R. 1986a. Streamlining lean meat production from pigs at farm level. In Lean Pig-Meat Production (ed. Petchey, A. M.) pp. 23–39. North of Scotland College of Agriculture, Aberdeen.Google Scholar
English, P. R. 1986b. Sow productivity: the need to focus more attention on the boar, the gilt and the nursing sow. Practical Pig Review, Autumn 1986, pp. 4–8. Community Media Ltd, Bath.Google Scholar
English, P. R. 1987. Survey on rearing systems and duration of suckling periods. In Welfare Aspects of Pig Rearing (ed. Marx, D., Grauvogl, A. and Smidt, D.), Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
English, P. R., Baxter, S. H. and Smith, W. J. 1982. Accommodating the welfare dimension in future systems. Animal Production 34: 367 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
English, P. R. and MacDonald, D. C. 1986. Animal behaviour and welfare. In Bioindustrial Systems (ed. Cole, D. J. A. and Brander, G. C.), Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
English, P. R. and Morrison, V. 1982. Management of the sow and litter in late pregnancy and lactation in relation to piglet survival and growth. In Control of Pig Reproduction (ed. Cole, D. J. A. and Foxcroft, G. R.), pp. 479–506. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
English, P. R. and Morrison, V. 1985. Lowering piglet losses: success story on survival. Pig International 15: (4) 6–8.Google Scholar
English, P. R. and Smith, W. J. 1975. Some causes of death in neonatal piglets. The Veterinary Annual Vol. 15, pp. 95–104. Wright Scientechnica, Bristol.Google Scholar
Great Britain Parliament. 1981. House of Commons First Report from the Agricultural Committee. Session 1980–81. Animal Welfare in Poultry, Pig and Veal Calf Production. Volume 1, pp. 26–35. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Hemsworth, P. H. 1982. Social environment and reproduction. In Control of Pig Reproduction (ed. Cole, D. J. A. and Foxcroft, G. R.), pp. 585–601. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, P. H., Cronin, G. M. and Hansen, C. 1982. The influence of social restriction during rearing on the sexual behaviour of the gilt. Animal Production 35: 35–40.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. H. F. 1982. Reproduction of Farm Animals. Longmans, London.Google Scholar
Kelley, K. W. 1982. Environmental effects on the immune system of pigs. Pig News and Information 3: 395–399.Google Scholar
Kelley, K. W., Blecha, F. and Regnier, J. A. 1982. Cold exposure and absorption of colostrol immunoglobulins by neonatal pigs. Journal of Animal Science 55: 363–368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le Dividich, J. 1981. Effects of environmental temperature on the growth rates of early-weaned piglets. Livestock Production Science 8: 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission. 1986. Pig Yearbook. Meat and Livestock Commission, Bletchley.Google Scholar
Morrison, V., English, P. R. and Lodge, G. A. 1983. The effect of alternative creep heating arrangements at two house temperatures on piglet lying behaviour and mortality in the neonatal period. Animal Production 36: 530–531 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Petherick, J. C. and Baxter, S. H. 1982. Modelling the static spatial requirement of livestock. In Modelling, Design and Evaluation of Agricultural Buildings, (ed. McCormack, J. A. D.), pp. 75–82. Scottish Farm Buildings Investigation Unit, Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Smith, A. T. 1987. Current pig production systems. In Pig Housing and the Environment (ed. Smith, A. T. and Lawrence, T. L. J.), pp. 1–8. Occasional Publication, British Society of Animal Production, No. 11.Google Scholar
Smith, W. J. 1987. The influence of housing on pig health. In Pig Housing and the Environment (ed. Smith, A. T. and Lawrence, T. L. J.), pp. 25–28. Occasional Publication, British Society of Animal Production, No. 11.Google Scholar
Svendsen, J. and Svendsen, L. S. 1987. Environmental components of pig health. In Pig Housing and the Environment (ed. Smith, A. T. and Lawrence, T. L. J.), pp. 29–39. Occasional Publication, British Society of Animal Production, No. 11.Google Scholar
Watson, R. D. and Friend, J. A. R. 1987. Pig housing and human health. In Pig Housing and the Environment (ed. Smith, A. T. and Lawrence, T. L. J.), pp. 41–51. Occasional Publication, British Society of Animal Production, No. 11.Google Scholar
Welch, A. R. and Baxter, M. R. 1986. Responses of newborn piglets to thermal and tactile properties of their environment. Applied Animal Behavioural Science 15: 203–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar