Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T00:01:57.299Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perceived welfare issues in dairy cattle, with special emphasis on metabolic stress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

B. L. Nielsen
B. L. Nielsen*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Health and Welfare, Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Research Centre Foulum, PO Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
Get access

Abstract

There appears to be little consensus on the extent and the exact nature of the dairy cow welfare problem. In the present paper the welfare of cows is described in the light of metabolic stress. The duration of lactation relative to level of production is highlighted as the main factor which sets the dairy cow apart from other lactating mammals. A conceptual diagram of the components and effects of metabolic load is given, a number of questions are raised and two aspects of dairy production are highlighted which relate to the welfare of modern dairy cows. These relate to decreased fertility in high yielding cows and the cumulative effects of successive lactations. Finally, the need for the dairy industry to participate actively and openly in the welfare debate is emphasized.

Type
Research Article
Information
BSAP Occasional Publication , Volume 24: Metabolic stress in dairy cows , 1999 , pp. 1 - 7
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council. 1981. The nutrient requirements of pigs. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, UK.Google Scholar
Alban, L. and Agger, J. F. 1996. Welfare in Danish dairy herds 1. Disease management routines in 1983 and 1994. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 37:49–63.Google Scholar
Beaudeau, F. and Seegers, H. 1996. [Replacement. Knowing the reasons for culling.] Production Laitière Moderne 256: 76–77.Google Scholar
Blood, D. C. and Studdert, V. P. 1988. Bailliére’s comprehensive veterinary dictionary Bailliére Tindall, London.Google Scholar
Boutflour, R. 1967. The high yielding dairy cow. Crosby Lockwood & Son Ltd, London.Google Scholar
Butler, W. R. and Smith, R. D. 1989. Interrelationships between energy balance and postpartum reproductive function in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 72: 767–783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eriksson, M. 1980. Breeding in a laboratory colony of wood mice, Apodemus sylvaticus (Linne 1758). Saugetierkundliche Mitteilungen 28: 79–80.Google Scholar
Esslemont, R. J. and Kossaibati, M. A. 1997. Culling in 50 dairy herds in England. Veterinary Record 140: 36–39.Google Scholar
Farm Animal Welfare Council. 1997. Report on the welfare of dairy cattle. Farm Animal Welfare Council, Surbiton, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Gordon, P. J., Peters, A. R., Ward, S. J. and Warren, M. J. 1996. The use of prostaglandin in combination with a GnRH agonist in controlling the timing of ovulation in dairy cows. Proceedings of the XIX world buiatrics congress, 8-12 July, Edinburgh, pp. 164–169.Google Scholar
Kossaibati, M. A. and Esslemont, R. J. 1995. Wastage in dairy herds. DAISY — The Dairy Information System, report no. 4, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Kronfeld, D. S. 1976. The potential importance of the proportions of glucogenic, lipogenic, aminogenic nutrients in regard to the health and productivity of dairy cows. Advances in Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 7:5–26.Google Scholar
Loudon, A. S. I. and Kay, R. N. B. 1984. Lactational constraints on a seasonally breeding mammal: the red deer. Symposium of the Zoological Society of London 51:233–252.Google Scholar
Linzell, J. L. 1972. Milk yield, energy loss in milk and mammary gland weight in different species. Dairy Science Abstracts 34: 351–360.Google Scholar
McFarland, D. 1989. Problems of animal behaviour. Longman, Harlow.Google Scholar
Mepham, T. B. 1987. Physiology of lactation. Open University Press, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
Nebel, R. L. and McGilliard, M. L. 1993. Interactions of high milk yield and reproductive performance in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 76:3257–3268.Google Scholar
Nielsen, B. L. and Lawrence, A. B. 1996. Is metabolic load necessarily stressful? Proceedings of the XIX World Buiatrics Congress, 8-12 July, Edinburgh, pp. 79–82.Google Scholar
Oftedal, O. T. 1984. Milk composition, milk yield and energy output at peak lactation: â comparative review. Symposium of the Zoological Society of London 51:33–85.Google Scholar
Oftedal, O. T. 1993. The adaptation of milk secretion to the constraints of fasting in bears, seals and baleen whales. Journal of Dairy Science 76:3234–3246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oftedal, O. T., Hintz, H. F. and Schryver, H. F. 1983. Lactation in the horse: Milk composition and intake by foals. Journal of Nutrition 113: 2196–2206.Google Scholar
Oldham, J. D., Nielsen, B. L. and Whitaker, D. 1996. Identification and analysis of the causes of metabolic stress. BBSRC dairy cow welfare workshop, 30 April - 1 May, Leeds.Google Scholar
Pryce, J. E., Nielsen, B. L., Veerkamp, R. F. and Simm, G. 1999. Genotype and feeding system effects and interactions for health and fertility traits in dairy cattle. Livestock Production Science 57:193–201.Google Scholar
Smith, K. L. and Hogan, J. S. 1998. Animal health and welfare in the USA. Proceedings of the 25th international dairy congress, 21-24 September, Aarhus, Denmark. Google Scholar
Somerville, S. H., Lowman, B. G. and Edwards, R. A. 1983. A study of the relationship between plane of nutrition during lactation and certain production characteristics in autumn-calving suckler cows. Animal Production 37: 353–363.Google Scholar
Veerkamp, R. F., Simm, G. and Oldham, J. D. 1994. Effects of interaction between genotype and feeding system on milk production, feed intake, efficiency and body tissue mobilisation in dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 39: 229–241.Google Scholar
Wamberg, S. and Tauson, A.-H. 1998. Daily milk intake and body water turnover in suckling mink (Mustela vison) kits. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, Part A 119: 931–939.Google Scholar
Webster, A. J. F. 1995a. Welfare considerations in future selection and management strategies. In Breeding and feeding the high genetic merit dairy cow (ed. Lawrence, T. L. J., Gordon, F. J. and Carson, A.), pp. 87–93. British Society of Animal Science occasional publication no. 19.Google Scholar
Webster, A. J. F. 1995b. Animal welfare: a cool eye towards Eden. Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar