Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-p566r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T14:12:41.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nutrition of the Finishing lamb

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

G. M. Webster
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, The University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU
Gillian M. Povey
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, The University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU
Get access

Abstract

In order to achieve maximum economic returns, the finished-lamb producer needs to plan his production system to meet the requirements of his chosen market. These requirements are now becoming more specific as consumer demands for a quality product increase and new markets (e.g. Europe) become available. With the diversity of genetic and environmental backgrounds of lambs destined for slaughter, together with the seasonality of breeding in sheep, it is not surprising that a range of finishing systems exists. This paper highlights recent developments in the nutrition of the finishing lamb and examines their potential.

In the early lambing flock, where fast growth rates are essential, lambs are often weaned when they are 4 to 6 weeks old. Similarly, in flocks lambing more than once per year, early weaning is necessary to allow the ewe to recover body condition before the next mating. Cereals are rich sources of energy and highly palatable to young lambs. Their rapid rate of fermentation in the rumen makes intensive finishing on cereal-based diets a relatively easy process, with growth rates of 350 to 400 g/day allowing lambs to reach slaughter weight at 12 to 14 weeks of age. To avoid the production of soft fat, which arises from high levels of propionic acid in the rumen, cereals should be offered as whole grains. Considerable benefits in terms of growth rate may be achieved by the inclusion of high quality protein sources of low rumen degradability, such as fish meal, in the diet.

The use of fodder crops grazed in situ for finishing store lambs has declined in recent years with the result that interest in indoor finishing systems has increased. These systems based on concentrate foods result in rapid growth rates. Alternatively, silage-based diets with appropriate supplements may be used to produce more modest growth rates, allowing lambs to be taken to heavier weights. Maintenance feeding during the store period has a major influence on the response of these lambs to improved nutrition, particularly to protein of low rumen degradability. Environmental limitations such as shortening daylength may also be an important consideration.

Lamb carcass quality is becoming increasingly important in market specifications and the ability of lambs to produce more lean and less fat has been demonstrated in experiments involving pharmacological manipulation. While these techniques may not be acceptable to the consumer, the potential to enhance carcass composition by dietary means clearly still exists.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. G. 1989. Manipulation of body composition through nutrition, hormones, betaagonists and immunological processes. In Información Técnica Económica Agraria, Volumen Extra No. 9, III Jornadas Sobre Produccion Animal, pp. 1946. Asociacion Interprofesional Para El Desarrollo Agrario.Google Scholar
Black, J. L. 1983. Growth and development of lambs. In Sheep Production (ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 2158. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Brinklow, B. R., Jones, R. and Forbes, J. M. 1984. The effect of daylength on the growth of lambs. 5. Skeletal photoperiod. Animal Production 38: 455461.Google Scholar
Butler, G. 1985. Silage for lamb finishing. In Hill and Upland Livestock Production (ed. Maxwell, T. J. and Gunn, R. G.). Occasional Publication, British Society of Animal Production, No. 10, pp. 140141.Google Scholar
Butler-Hogg, B. W. and Johnsson, I. D. 1987. Bovine growth hormone in lambs: effects on carcass composition and tissue distribution in crossbred females. Animal Production 44:117124.Google Scholar
Duncan, W. R. H., Ørskov, E. R. and Garton, G. A. 1972. Fatty acid composition of triglycerides of lambs fed on barley-based diets. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 31: 19A-20A (Abstr.).Google ScholarPubMed
Emmans, G. C., Cropper, M., Dingwall, W. S., Brown, H., Oldham, J. D. and Harland, J. I. 1989. Efficiencies of use of the metabolizable energy from foods based on barley or sugar-beet feed in immature sheep. Animal Production 48: 634635 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Fattet, I., Hovell, F. D. Deb., Ørskov, E. R., Kyle, D. J., Pennie, K. and Smart, R. I. 1984. Undernutrition in sheep. The effect of supplementation with protein on protein accretion. British Journal of Nutrition 52: 561574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitzgerald, J. J. 1987. Finishing store lambs on silage-based diets. 4. Effects of stage of grass growth when ensiled and barley supplementation on silage intake and lamb performance. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 26: 139151.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, S. 1983. The use of forage crops for store lamb fattening. In Sheep Production (ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 239286. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Forbes, J. M. 1982. Effects of lighting pattern on growth, lactation and food intake of sheep, cattle and deer. Livestock Production Science 9:361374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, J. M., Elshahat, A. A., Jones, R., Duncan, J. G. S. and Boaz, T. G. 1979. The effect of daylength on the growth of lambs. 1. Comparisons of sex, level of feeding, shearing and breed of sire. Animal Production 29: 3342.Google Scholar
Hanrahan, J. P. 1987. Beta-Agonists and Their Effects on Animal Growth and Carcass Quality. Elsevier, London.Google Scholar
Haresign, W., Mcleod, B. J., Webster, G. M. and Worthy, K. 1985. Endocrine basis of seasonal anoestrus in sheep. In Endocrine Causes of Seasonal and Lactational Anoestrus in Farm Animals (ed. Ellendorff, F. and Elsaesser, F.). pp. 618. Kluwer-Nijhoff, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harker, A. and Cuddeford, D. 1987. The role of magnesium in the aetiology of urolithiasis in fattening store lambs and intensively-reared lambs. Animal Production 44: 482 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Hassan, S. A. and Bryant, M. J. 1986. The response of store Iambs to protein supplementation of a roughage-based diet. Animal Production 42: 7379.Google Scholar
Jones, R., Forces, J. M., Slade, C. F. R. and Appleton, M. 1982. The effect of daylength on the growth of lambs. 4. Daylength extension to 20 h under practical conditions. Animal Production 35: 914.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J. 1989. Carcass and meat quality research to meet market needs. Animal Production 48: 483496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamming, G. E. and Peters, A. R. 1987. Future developments in the manipulation of growth in farm animals. Veterinary Record 120: 495499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mcewan, J. C. and Hanrahan, J. P. 1985. Summary of sheep production trials using βagonists. An Foras Talúntais, Animal Production Research Report 1985, pp. 89.Google Scholar
Marchment, S. M. and Miller, E. L. 1985. Voluntary food intake and growth responses in store lambs given protein supplements to grass silage. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 44: 47A (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission. 1988. Sheep Yearbook. Meat and Livestock Commission, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission. 1989. Sheep in Britain. Meat and Livestock Commission, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1975. Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Technical Bulletin 33. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Minter, C. M. and Tempest, W. M. 1987. Supplementation of silage for finishing lambs. Animal Production 44: 483 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. 1982. Very intensive systems. In Sheep and Goat Production (ed. Coop, I. E.), pp. 401416. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. 1983. Nutrition of lambs from birth to slaughter. In Sheep Production (ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 155165. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. 1987. Early weaning and fattening of lambs. In New Techniques in Sheep Production (ed. Marai, I. F. M. and Owen, J. B.), pp. 189195. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Fraser, C. and Gordon, J. G. 1974. Effect of processing cereals on rumen fermentation, digestibility, rumination time, and firmness of subcutaneous fat in lambs. British Journal of Nutrition 32: 5969.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rskov, E. R. and Grubb, D. A. 1979. Growth of store lambs on cereal-based diets with protein or urea. Animal Production 29: 371377.Google Scholar
Povey, G. M. and Webster, G. M. 1987. Response of lowland store lambs to protein and energy supplementation of silage. Proceedings of the Eighth Silage Conference, pp. 165166. Institute for Grassland and Animal Production, Hurley.Google Scholar
Povey, G. M., Webster, G. M. and Weekes, T. E. C. 1989. The response of silage-fed Scottish Blackface lambs to different levels of energy and protein supplementation with or without a store period. Animal Production 48: 645 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Povey, G. M., Webster, G. M. and Weekes, T. E. C. 1990. The responses of silage-fed Scottish Blackface lambs to increasing levels of fish meal supplementation with or without additional barley. In New Developments in Sheep Production (ed. Slade, C. F. R. and Lawrence, T. L. J.), Occasional Publication, British Society of Animal Production, No. 14, pp. 157161.Google Scholar
Reed, K. F. M. 1979. A note on the feeding value of grass and grass/clover silages for store lambs. Animal Production 28: 271274.Google Scholar
Salman, A. D. and Owen, E. 1981. A note on the effect of autumn shearing on performance of fattening lambs. Animal Production 33: 337338.Google Scholar
Schanbacher, B. D. and Crouse, J. D. 1980. Growth and performance of growing-finishing lambs exposed to long or short photoperiods. Journal of Animal Science 51: 943948.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sniffen, C. J. and Hogue, D. E. 1984. Balancing rations influence amino acid flow to the small intestine of ruminants. Proceedings of the Cornell Nutrition Conference 1984, pp. 152158. Department of Animal Science, Cornell University, Ithaca.Google Scholar
Tayer, S. R. and Bryant, M. J. 1988. The response of store lambs to dietary supplements of fish meal. 3. Effects of the preceding pattern of growth. Animal Production 47: 393399.Google Scholar
Tempest, W. M. 1983. Management of the frequent lambing flock. In Sheep Production (ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 467481. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Vipond, J. E., King, M. E., Ørskov, E. R. and Wetherill, G. Z. 1989. Effects of fish meal supplementation on performance of overfat lambs fed on barley straw to reduce carcass fatness. Animal Production 48: 131138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warriss, P. D., Kestin, S. C. and Brown, S. N. 1989. The effect of beta-adrenergic agonists on carcass and meat quality in sheep. Animal Production 48: 385392.Google Scholar
Wilesmith, J. W. and Gitter, M. 1986. Epidemiology of ovine listeriosis in Great Britain. Veterinary Record 119: 467470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yilala, K. and Bryant, M. J. 1985. The effects upon the intake and performance of store lambs of supplementing grass silage with barley, fish meal and rapeseed meal. Animal Production 40: 111121.Google Scholar