Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T21:36:26.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Milk urea concentrations and pregnancy rate in dairy cows and a comparison of a dip-stick method and a laboratory method to measure milk urea concentrations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

A.A. Ponter
Affiliation:
LEGSA-ENVA, 7, avenue du General-de-Gaulle, 94704 MAISONS-ALFORT, cédex, France
B. Grimard
Affiliation:
LEGSA-ENVA, 7, avenue du General-de-Gaulle, 94704 MAISONS-ALFORT, cédex, France
C. Ficheux
Affiliation:
LEGSA-ENVA, 7, avenue du General-de-Gaulle, 94704 MAISONS-ALFORT, cédex, France
J.-M. Beduneau
Affiliation:
LEGSA-ENVA, 7, avenue du General-de-Gaulle, 94704 MAISONS-ALFORT, cédex, France
F. Deletang
Affiliation:
Sanofi Santé Nutrition Animale, ZI La Ballastière, BP 126, 33501 LIBOURNE cédex, France
J.-P. Mialot
Affiliation:
LEGSA-ENVA, 7, avenue du General-de-Gaulle, 94704 MAISONS-ALFORT, cédex, France
Get access

Abstract

The first study was conducted to investigate the possible relationship between milk urea concentrations and pregnancy rate in dairy cows. A total of 173 dairy cows were used in the study. They had not experienced reproductive problems post partum, however they were treated for suboestrus between 60 to 90 d post partum with either PGF2α or GnRH, PGF2α and GnRH. Suboestrus cows were studied in this experiment in order to see whether, when ovulation is initiated, high milk urea concentrations were associated with a poorer response to treatment. Milk samples were collected on the day of AI, for the measurement of urea concentrations, and pregnancy diagnosis was performed by the assay of Pregnancy Specific Protein Binding (PSPB) 50 d post-AI. Peak milk production (P=0.06), the type of diet (P=0.05), the main forage type (P=0.07) and the concentrate distribution system (P=0.03) influenced milk urea concentrations. There was no difference in the concentrations of urea in the milk of pregnant and non-pregnant cows (P = 0.33, 0.25 g L-1 vs. 0.27 g L-1, respectively). Pregnancy rate was not influenced by the type of suboestrus treatment used. A second experiment showed that there was a linear relationship between milk urea concentrations measured by a dipstick method (Azotest) and a laboratory method (r=0.51, P<0.001, n=89)

Type
Posters
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Butler, W.R., Calaman, J.J. & Beam, S.W. 1996. Plasma and milk urea nitrogen in relation to pregnancy rate in lactating dairy cattle. Journal of Animal Science 74: 858865.Google Scholar
Faverdin, P. & Vérité, R. 1998. Utilisation de la teneur en xaiz du lait comme indicateur de la nutrition protéique et des rejets azotés chez la vache laitière. Rencontres Recherche Ruminants 5: 209212.Google Scholar
Jonker, J.S., Kohn, R.A. & Erdman, R.A. 1998. Using milk urea nitrogen to predict nitrogen excretion and utilization efficiency in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 81: 26812692.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roffler, R., Satter, L., Hardie, A. & Tyler, W. 1978. Influence of dietary protein concentration on milk production by dairy cattle during early lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 61: 14221428.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1996. SAS/STATuser's guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar