Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T21:12:21.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Longitudinal study of adverse behaviour of undocked pigs in two different housing systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

H. A. Van de Weerd
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle, School of Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, King George VI Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK
C. M. Docking
Affiliation:
2ADAS Pig Research Unit, Terrington St. Clement, King's Lynn, Norfolk, PE34 4PW, UK
J .E. L. Day
Affiliation:
2ADAS Pig Research Unit, Terrington St. Clement, King's Lynn, Norfolk, PE34 4PW, UK
K. Breuer
Affiliation:
2ADAS Pig Research Unit, Terrington St. Clement, King's Lynn, Norfolk, PE34 4PW, UK
S. A. Edwards
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle, School of Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, King George VI Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK
Get access

Abstract

The development of adverse behaviour in group–housed growing/ finishing pigs with intact tails was studied in a straw–flow housing system and in a part–slatted system with a commercial enrichment object. Food intake, body weight and behaviour were monitored over the finishing period, with tail biting outbreaks defined as an occasion where three or more pigs within a group had freshly damaged tails and tail biting behaviour was ongoing. Data from the two systems were analysed to identify tail–biting outbreaks and behavioural changes over time. Levels of pig manipulation were higher in the part–slatted system. Over time, pigs in both systems showed reduced interest in the enrichment provided, but not in each other. Despite the presence of the enrichment device, tail biting occurred in all groups in the part–slatted system, but only 1/12 groups in the straw–flow system. The amount of time occupied by manipulation of the enrichment provided was very significantly higher for straw than for the commercial object. Better design of enrichment strategies is therefore needed and should be based on species–relevant requirements.

Type
Posters
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Mench, J.A. 1998. Environmental enrichment and the importance of exploratory behavior. In Second Nature: Environmental Enrichment for Captive Animals (ed. D.J., Sheperdson, J.D., Mellen and M., Hutchins), pp. 3046. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC, USA.Google Scholar
Van de Weerd, H.A., Docking, C., Day, J.E.L., Avery, P.J. and Edwards, S.A. 2003. A systematic approach towards developing environmental enrichment for pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 84: 101118.Google Scholar