Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T22:47:15.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Field assessment of GnRH-PGF oestrous synchronisation in confined Holstein cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

J.F. Cox
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Concepcion , Vicente Mendez 595, Fax:(56-42) 270212, Chilian, Chile
F. Saravia
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Concepcion , Vicente Mendez 595, Fax:(56-42) 270212, Chilian, Chile
O. Torrealba
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Concepcion , Vicente Mendez 595, Fax:(56-42) 270212, Chilian, Chile
A. Zavala
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Concepcion , Vicente Mendez 595, Fax:(56-42) 270212, Chilian, Chile
A. Lobos
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Concepcion , Vicente Mendez 595, Fax:(56-42) 270212, Chilian, Chile
Get access

Abstract

The present study determined the effect of a GnRH and PGF treatment on proportion of cows detected in oestrus, the distribution of oestrous activity and subsequent fertility. The study also incorporated the use of ovarian ultrasound and milk progesterone assay to established a better overall assessment of treatments. Holstein-Friesian cows, averaging 9000-kg milk/lactation, and fed according to their requirements were used in the study. Cows were regularly cyclic; at least 60 days postpartum, had had two oestrous cycles and were clinically sound before being considered for either experiment. In Experiment 1, 274 cows were treated at random with an i.m. injection of 10 μg of GnRH (buserelin) followed 7 days later by 0.75 mg oftiaprost based on the ultrasound diagnosis of a corpus luteum. At that time and 3 days later, milk samples were collected and assayed for progesterone. Cows with progesterone concentrations >1 ng/ml were considered to have a corpus luteum, and luteolysis was assumed to have occurred when concentrations 3 days later were <0.8 ng/ml. In Experiment 2, 1431 cows were treated as above. The response to treatment was assessed by presence of a corpus luteum 7 d after GnRH treatment, oestrous detection rate, and distribution of heats and ultimately on conception rate. Conception rate was compared to untreated control cows inseminated by the same inseminator and using semen from the same sires. Artificial breeding was carried out after oestrous detection and pregnancy diagnosis was done by ultrasound. In Experiment 1, luteolysis was induced in 244/274 (89.1%) cows following PGF administration, with 198/214 (92.5%) been diagnosed correctly in heat and 16/214 (7.5%) been diagnosed in error based on progesterone profiles. Oestrous activity was most concentrated on day 3 (59.1%), with 20.7% and 16.7% of heats recorded on d 2 and d 4, respectively. When compared to untreated controls, GnRH-PGF treated cows had a better conception rate (56.6 vs. 39.5%, P<0.01). In Experiment 2, 1012/1431 (70.7%) had a CL 7 days after GnRH injection; 709/1012 (70.1%) cows were detected in oestrus, and 359/700 (51.3%) cows became pregnant after insemination compared to 182/434 (41.9%) of untreated controls (P<0.05). The utilisation of GnRH and PGF seems to be a useful synchronisation scheme based on AI after oestrous detection. However, variations in fertility after treatment demands a better understanding offactors affecting herd fertility under controlled schemes.

Type
Posters
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Britt, J.H., Scott, R.G., Armstrong, J.D. and Whitacre, M.D. 1986. Determinants of estrous behavior in lactating Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 69:21952202.Google Scholar
Burke, J.M., De La Sota, R.L., Risco, C.A., Staples, C.R., Schmitt, E.J.P. and Thatcher, W.W. 1996. Evaluation of timed insemination using a gonodatropin-releasing hormone agonist in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 79:13851393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kastelic, J.P. and Ginther, O.J. 1991. Factors affecting the origin of the ovulatory follicle in heifers with induced luteolysis. Animal Reproduction Science 26:1324.Google Scholar
Lucy, M.C., Savio, J.D., Badinga, L., De La Sota, R.L. and Thatcher, W.W. 1992. Factors that affect ovarian follicular dynamics in cattle. Journal of Animal Science 70:36153626.Google Scholar
Larson, L.L. and Ball, P.J. 1992. Regulation of estrous cycles in dairy cattle: a review. Theriogenology 38:256267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pursley, J.R., Mee, M.O. and Wiltbank, M.C. 1995. Synchronization of ovulation in dairy cows using PGF and GnRH. Theriogenology 44:915923.Google Scholar
Thatcher, W.W., Macmillan, K.L., Hansen, P.J. and Drost, M. 1989. Concepts for regulation of corpus luteum function by the conceptus and ovarian follicles to improve fertility. Theriogenology 31:149164.Google Scholar
Twagiramungu, H., Guilbault, L.A. and Dufour, J.J. 1995. Synchronization of ovarian follicular waves with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist to increase the precision of estrus in cattle: a review. Journal of Animal Science 73:31413151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webb, R., Gosden, R.G., Telfer, E.E. and Moor, R.M. 1999. Factors affecting folliculogenesis in ruminants. Animal Science 68:257284.Google Scholar
Wolfenson, D., Thatcher, W.W., Savio, J.D., Badinga, L. and Lucy, M.C. 1994. The effect of a GnRH analogue on the dynamics of follicular development and synchronization of estrus in lactating cyclic dairy cows. Theriogenology 42:633644.Google Scholar