Skip to main content Accessibility help

Environmental impacts of livestock production

  • T. R. Cumby (a1) and V. R. Phillips (a1)


Livestock production under Northern European conditions can affect water, air and soil. Examples of the possible environmental effects on water are fish kills or microbial contamination, if solid manure, slurry, “dirty water” or silage effluent are collected, stored, handled or spread inappropriately. Examples of the possible environmental effects on air are emissions of ammonia (which can lead to acidification and, after subsequent deposition, to eutrophication), the greenhouse gases methane and nitrous oxide, odours and particulates.

In the case of water pollution, good management practices using existing technology are usually adequate for preventing most environmental impacts. This often requires storage during periods when conditions are unsuitable for spreading, followed by carefully controlled application. However, for relatively dilute effluents (such as dairy farm “dirty water”), it may be more cost-effective to use different approaches, such as waste minimisation and/or continuous treatment and land spreading. Recent research results are reviewed and compared in this paper, to identify ways in which farmers can prevent water pollution at least cost. The potential implications of such measures on further reductions in the annual numbers of pollution incidents are discussed in conjunction with the impacts of different regulatory and punitive approaches.

In the case of preventing air pollution, although good management can achieve much, there is a need for new technology to back it up. Existing ammonia abatement techniques are mostly expensive and farmer-unfriendly. In the longer term, changes to the animals' diet should hold the greater potential for abatement, not only of ammonia emissions but also of methane emissions. Reducing one form of pollution can often increase another, so an integrated approach to solving pollution problems is necessary.



Hide All
Brewer, A. J.; Cumby, T. R.; Dimmock, S. J. 1999. Dirty water from dairy farms, II: Treatment and disposal options. Bioresource Technology 67, (2) 161169
Brookman, S.K.E., Harrod, T.R. and Pain, B.F. 1994. Low rate irrigation of dirty water. National Rivers Authority, Research and Development Note 262, 88 pp.
Chadwick, D.R., Brookman, S.K.E., Leeds Harrison, P., Tyrrel, S., Fleming, S. and Pain, B.F. 2000. Soil Based Treatment Systems for Dirty Water. In; Proceedings for the Eighth International Symposium on Animal, Agricultural and Food Processing Wastes, 9th-11th October 2000, Des Moines, Iowa, US. pp. 728737. ASAE, Michigan.
Chadwick, D.R., Sneath, R.W., Phillips, V.R. and Pain, B.F. 1999. A UK inventory of nitrous oxide emissions from farmed livestock. Atmospheric Environment 33 33453354.
Cowell, D.A. and ApSimon, H.M. 1998. Cost effective strategies for the abatement of ammonia emissions from European agriculture. Atmospheric Environment 32 573580.
Cowell, D.A., Phillips, V.R. and Sneath, R.W. 1999. An assessment of ways to abate ammonia emissions from livestock buildings and waste stores. Part 2 Cost modelling. Bioresource Technology. 70 157164.
Cumby, T. R.; Brewer, A. J.; Dimmock, S. J. 1999. Dirty water from dairy farms, I: Biochemical characteristics. Bioresource Technology 67, (2) 155160
DEFRA. 2001. Draft Soil Strategy for England – A Consultation Paper. Department For Environment, Food And Rural Affairs In:
Dwyer, J; Baldock, D.; Shaw, K.; Einschütz, S. 2001. Identifying Baseline Standards In Agriculture – Research Report no 405, English Nature, Northminster House, Peterborough UK
ENDS. 2000. Farming's Environmental Costs Top £1.5 Billion per Year, Says Agency. The ENDS Report No 309 October 2000
ENDS. 1998. Climate change “may be” behind decline in river quality. The ENDS Report No 283 August 1998, p. 10
ENDS. 1996c. Framers have poor awareness of pollution prevention codes. The ENDS Report No 256 May 1996
ENDS. 1996b. Royal Commission puts soil on the map. The ENDS Report No 252 March 1996, p. 2326
ENDS. 1996a. Scientist attacks government for playing down eutrophication. The ENDS Report No 254 January 1996, p. 35
Environment Agency. 2000a. Minister And Assembly Secretary Praise River Quality Improvements Document Sm282/00ho 21 September 2000 In:
Environment Agency. 2000b. Diffuse Pollution Impacts: The Environmental and Economic Impacts of Diffuse Pollution. Terence Dalton Publishers UK
Groenestein, C.M. and Van Fassen, H.G. 1996. Volatilization of ammonia, nitrous oxide and nitric oxide in deep-litter systems for fattening pigs. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 65, 269274.
Lee, P.A. and Kay, R.M., 1997. Economic implications of reduced crude protein diets for pigs to reduce ammonia emissions. In Voermans, J.A.M. and Monteny, G.J., eds ‘Ammonia and odour emissions from animal production facilities’.. NVTL, Rosmalen, Netherlands, Vol 2, pp 669706.
Mackinson, G. 2000. Monitoring of sheep dip compounds in water supplies in Wales. Environment Division, National Assembly for Wales, Cardiff
MAFF, SERAD, DARD(NI), NAWAD. 2001. Agriculture in the United Kingdom 2000. (Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and FoodScottish Executive Rural Affairs Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (Northern Ireland) National Assembly for Wales Agriculture Department) The Stationery Office London 97 pp.
MAFF. 1998a. The Water Code. Booklet PB0587 MAFF Publications, London SW1A 2XX. 97 pp.
MAFF. 1998b. The Soil Code. Booklet PB 0617. MAFF Publications, London SW1A 2XX. 66 pp.
MAFF 1998c. The Air Code. Booklet PB 0618. MAFF Publications, London SW1A 2XX. 80 pp.
Mead, G.C., ed, 1989. Processing of poultry. Elsevier Applied Science, London, 423 pp.
Misselbrook, T.H. van der Weerden, T.J., Pain, B.F., Jarvis, S.C., Chambers, B.J., Smith, K.A., Phillips, V.R. and Demmers, T.G.M. 2000. Ammonia emission factors for UK agriculture. Atmospheric Environment 34, 87880.
Pain, B.F., van der Weerden, T.J., Chambers, B.J., Phillips, V.R. and Jarvis, S.C. 1998. A new inventory for ammonia emissions from UK agriculture. Atmospheric Environment. 32 309313.
Pearson, A.M., Dutson, T.R., eds. 1992. Inedible meat by-products. Advances in meat research, Vol 8, Elsevier Applied Science, London, 416 pp.
Phillips, V.R., Cowell, D.A., Sneath, R.W., Cumby, TR., Williams, A.G., Demmers, T.G.M. and Sandars, D.L. 1999. An assessment of ways to abate ammonia emissions from livestock buildings and waste stores. Part 1 Ranking exercise. Bioresource Technology. 70 143155
Pretty, J.N., Brett, C., Gee, D., Hine, R.E., Mason, C.F., Morrison, J.I.L., Raven, H., Rayment, M.D. and van der Bijl, G., 2000. An assessment of the total external costs of UK agriculture. Agricultural Systems 65, 113136.
Sneath, R.W., Chadwick, D.R., Phillips, V.R. and Pain, B.F. 1997. A UK inventory of methane emissions from farmed livestock. Report to MAFF on Commissions WA 0604 and WA 0605, May, 55 pp.
Williams, J. R.; Nicholson, R. J. 1995. Low rate irrigation of dirty water and its effect on drainage water quality. The Agricultural Engineer, 50 (2), 2428
Wathes, C.M., Abeyesinghe, S.M., Frost, A.R. 2001. Environmental design and management for livestock in the 21st Century: resolving conflicts by integrated solutions. In: Livestock Environment VI. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium, Louisville, Kentucky, 21-23 May 2001, ASAE, Michigan. 514.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Environmental impacts of livestock production

  • T. R. Cumby (a1) and V. R. Phillips (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.