Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-24T18:17:51.301Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Estimation of in vitro degradation of dietary proteins in ruminants by using enzymes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

A. S. Chaudhry*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production, University of Queensland Gatton College, Old 4345Australia
Get access

Extract

Protein degradation in the rumen determines the supply of dietary nitrogen (N) to microbes and undegraded amino acids for direct absorption. The current systems of feeding ruminants identify rumen degradable protein (RDP) from undegraded protein (UDP) which is digestible post ruminally (Agricultural and Food Research Council (AFRC), 1992; Huntington and Givens 1995). The in sacco method has been useful to estimate RDP, UDP and rate of degradation of proteins in ruminants. However, its use is constrained by the fact that it requires surgically modified animals, is laborious, inconsistent and does not differentiate between proteins that disappear from the bag or which are digested by microbes. It is therefore important to develop rapid, robust and reproducible alternatives (in vitro) to simulate ruminal digestion of proteins. Chaudhry (1998) has shown a potential in Streptomyces griseus protease (enzyme) to estimate ruminal digestion in vitro given its consistently high proteolytic activity with purified proteins. This study examined the validity of this enzyme to estimate degradability of food proteins.

Buffer, enzyme and foods A potassium phosphate buffer (buffer) with a pH 6-8 was used to prepare protein suspensions and a solution of the protease (P5147, SIGMA). Samples of sunflower meal (SF), maize-gluten meal (MG), distillers’ dark grains (DG) and field beans (FB) were dried and ground through 1 or 4 mm sieves for in vitro enzyme and in sacco studies respectively.

Type
Posters
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural and Food Research Council. 1992. Technical Committee on Responses to Nutrients. Report no. 9. Nutritive requirements of ruminant animals: protein.Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews Series B 62: 787835.Google Scholar
Broderick, G. A. and Kang, J. H. 1980. Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media. Journal of Dairy Science 63: 6475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaudhry, A. S. 1998. Potential of enzymes or a centrifuged rumen fluid to estimate proteolysis of foods. In In vitro techniques for measuring nutrient supply to ruminants (ed. Deaville, E. R., Owen, E., Adesogan, A. T., Rymer, C., Huntington, J. A. and Lawrence, T. L. J.), pp. 120122. British Society of Animal Science occasional publication no. 22.Google Scholar
Chaudhry, A. S. and Webster, A. J. F. 1993. The true digestibility and biological value for rats of undegraded dietary nitrogen in feeds for ruminants. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 42:209221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudhry, A. S., Webster, A. J. F. and Marsden, S. 1992. Evaluation of protein foods for ruminants by solubility and electrophoresis. Animal Science 54: 504A (abstr.). Google Scholar
Huntington, J. A. and Givens, D. I. 1995. The in situ technique for studying the rumen degradation of feeds: a review of the procedure. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews, Series B 65:6393.Google Scholar
Luchini, N. D., Broderick, G. A. and Comb, D. K. 1996. Characterization of the proteolytic activity of commercial proteases and strained ruminal fluid. Journal of Animal Science 74:685692.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poos-Floyd, M., Klopfenstein, T. and Britton, R. A. 1985. Evaluation of laboratory techniques for predicting ruminal protein degradation. Journal of Dairy Science 68:829839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar