Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-jhxnr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T06:56:38.369Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do 95-kg live weight pigs choose to stand, sit or lie during short journeys?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

H. J. Guise ,
E. J. Hunter ,
P. J. Baynes ,
P. J. Wigglesworth ,
H. L. Riches  and
R. H. C. Penny
H. J. Guise
Affiliation:
Cambac JMA Research, Lower Cadleys, South Stoke, Reading RG8 0LX
E. J. Hunter
Affiliation:
Cambac JMA Research, Lower Cadleys, South Stoke, Reading RG8 0LX
P. J. Baynes
Affiliation:
Cambac JMA Research, Lower Cadleys, South Stoke, Reading RG8 0LX
P. J. Wigglesworth
Affiliation:
Cambac JMA Research, Lower Cadleys, South Stoke, Reading RG8 0LX
H. L. Riches
Affiliation:
Cambac JMA Research, Lower Cadleys, South Stoke, Reading RG8 0LX
R. H. C. Penny
Affiliation:
Cambac JMA Research, Lower Cadleys, South Stoke, Reading RG8 0LX
Get access

Extract

Although the need for pigs to lie down on long journeys is not in question, there is evidence that they may not choose to do so on journeys of less than 3h (Hunter et al., 1994). These observations were undertaken to determine how pigs in the 95 to 100 kg weight range behaved on short journeys. A three-tier floating-deck vehicle with weld-mesh flooring was used because the popularity of three-deck vehicles is increasing (Riches et al., 1996).

Type
Poster abstracts
Information
BSAP Occasional Publication , Volume 20: Animal Choices , 1997 , pp. 104 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bradshaw, R. H., Hall, S. J. G. and Broom, D. M. 1996. Behavioural and cortisol response of pigs and sheep during transport. Veterinary Record 138: 233–234.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, R. H., Parrott, R. F., Goode, J. A., Lloyd, D. M., Rodway, R. G. and Broom, D. M. 1996. Behavioural and hormonal responses of pigs during transport: effect of mixing and duration of journey. Animal Science 62: 547–554.Google Scholar
Hunter, E. J., Weeding, C. M., Guise, H. J., Abbott, T. A. and Penny, R. H. C. 1994. The effect of season and stocking density on pig welfare during transport. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 41: 274 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Lambooy, E. 1988. Road transport of pigs over a long distance: some aspects of behaviour, temperature and humidity during transport and some effects of the last two factors. Animal Production 46: 257–264.Google Scholar
Lambooy, E. and Engel, B. 1991. Transport of slaughter pigs by truck over a long distance: some aspects of loading density and ventilation. Livestock Production Science 28: 163–174.Google Scholar
Lambooy, E., Garssen, G. J., Walstra, P. Mateman, G. and Merkus, G. S. M. 1985. Transport of pigs by car for two days; some aspects of watering and loading density. Livestock Production Science 13: 289–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riches, H. L., Guise, H. J. and Penny, R. H. C. 1996. A national survey of transport conditions for pigs. Pig Journal 38: 8–18.Google Scholar