Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T02:58:28.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

4.1 Merits and demerits of importing exotic cattle compared with the improvement of local breeds: cattle in africa south of the sahara

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. C. M. Trail
J. C. M. Trail
Affiliation:
International Livestock Centre for Africa, Nairobi, Kenya
Get access

Extract

The limited genetic potential of indigenous cattle has often been quoted as a major constraint to beef and milk production in Africa south of the Sahara. Thus, considerable efforts have been and are being made to increase output through breeding programmes in many countries of the continent. These efforts include both the introduction of cattle from America, Asia and Europe for use in upgrading and crossbreeding schemes and maintenance as purebreds and the operation of selection programmes within indigenous cattle populations.

Type
Livestock Improvement
Information
BSAP Occasional Publication , Volume 4: Intensive Animal Production in Developing Countries , January 1981 , pp. 191 - 231
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Botswana, Ministry of Agriculture. 1978. Livestock and Range Research in Botswana. Gaborone, Animal Production Research Unit.Google Scholar
Epstein, H. 1971. The origin of the domestic animals of Africa. Volumes 1 and 2. New York, Africana.Google Scholar
FAO 1971. FAO production yearbook 1976. Volume 30. Rome.Google Scholar
Gruvel, J. and Gauch, J. G. 1977. Les trypanosomiases animales, en Cote d'Ivoire. Rome, FAOGoogle Scholar
ILCA 1978. The productivity of Sahiwals and their crosses in Kenya. Nairobi.Google Scholar
I.L.C.A. 1979. Trypanotolerant livestock in West and Central Africa. Monograph 2, Addis Ababa.Google Scholar
Kimenye, D. and Russell, W. S. 1975. Comparison of Ayrshire × Sahiwal cows with high grade Ayrshires in Kenya. E. Afr. Agric. For. J. 40: 416–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahadevan, P., Galukande, E. B. and Black, J. C. 1962. A genetic study of the Sahiwal grading-up scheme in Kenya. Anim. Prod. 4: 337–342.Google Scholar
Mason, I. L. 1951. The classification of West African Livestock. Technical Communication No. 7. Edinburgh, Bureau of Animal Breeding and Genetics.Google Scholar
Mason, I. L. 1965. Report to the Government of Kenya on the National Sahiwal Stud. Report No. 1965. Rome, FAO.Google Scholar
Mason, I. L. and Maule, J. P. 1960. The indigenous livestock of Eastern and Southern Africa. Technical communication No. 14. Farnham Royal, CAB.Google Scholar
Maule, J. P. 1973. The role of the indigenous breeds for beef production in southern Africa. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 3: 111–130.Google Scholar
Meyn, K. 1974. Breeding for milk in Africa with particular reference to the Sahiwal study in Kenya. First World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. Volume 2. Madrid, pp 223–229.Google Scholar
Meyn, K. 1978. Constraints of beef production in Africa — Breeding aspects. Livestock Development Projects Course. Nairobi, ILCA.Google Scholar
Meyn, K. and Mbogo, D. E. 1976. The use of artificial insemination in genetic improvement programmes for beef cattle in developing countries. In: Beef Cattle Production in Developing Countries. (Smith, A. J., ed.) Edinburgh, Univ. Edinburgh, CTVM, pp 347–357.Google Scholar
Meyn, K. and Wilkins, J. V. 1973. National cattle breeding programmes in Kenya. Proc. Third Wld Conf. Anim. Prod., Melbourne, pp 595–602.Google Scholar
Meyn, K. and Wilkins, J. V. 1974. Breeding for milk in Kenya with particular reference to the Sahiwal stud. Wld Anim. Rev. 11: 24–30.Google Scholar