Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T14:24:05.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The ‘Sonderweg’ of German Eugenics: Nationalism and Scientific Internationalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

Paul Weindling
Paul Weindling
Affiliation:
Wellcome Unit for the History of Medicine, University of Oxford, 45–47 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6PE, U.K.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The history of eugenics has become a classic arena for examining how the interplay of culture, social interests and social structures affects the advancement of science. At the same time eugenics demonstrates how in the first half of the twentieth century, the expectation arose that science could offer the solution of social problems; for biology intruded into many areas of social policy during the 1920s and 30s. Historians of science have been struck by the coincidence between the rise of genetics and eugenics after 1900. Genetics underpinned techniques of family reconstruction, which were deployed for the screening of population groups. Areas of social policy such as the prediction of potential criminals and other types of social deviancy relied on eugenic rationales. This poses intriguing problems concerning the extent to which genetic research was motivated by eugenic ideals, particularly in the field of human genetics. At the same time, it is important to recognize that eugenics was a heterogenous agglomeration of sciences: in addition to genetics, a prominent place was taken by anthropology, clinical medicine, statistics, and psychology. These diverse constituents were welded together by cultural and social movements peculiar to respective national contexts.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal for the History of Science , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , September 1989 , pp. 321 - 333
Copyright
Copyright © British Society for the History of Science 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For comparative studies see the volumes edited by M. Adams (in press) and Teitelbaum, M. and Winter, J. (eds), The debate on the declining birth rate, in Population and Development Review, special issue, Autumn 1988.Google Scholar

2 Haller, M., Eugenics: hereditary attitudes in American thought, New Jersey, 1963.Google Scholar

3 Kevles, D.J., In the Name of Eugenics, Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity, New York, 1985.Google Scholar

4 MacKenzie, D. ‘Sociobiologies in competition: the Biometrician-Mendelian debate’, in Webster, C. (ed), Biology, Medicine and Society 1840–1940, Cambridge, 1981, pp. 243–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 Gasman, D., The scientific origins of National Socialism, New York, 1971.Google Scholar

6 See Wehler, H.U.'s edition of Kehr, E., Der Primat der Innenpolitik, Berlin, 1965.Google Scholar

7 Wehler, H.U., ‘Sozialdarwinismus im expandierenden Industriestaat’, in Geiss, I. and Wendt, B.J. (eds), Deutschland in der Weltpolitik des 19. Jahrhunderts, Düsseldorf, 1974.Google Scholar

8 Puhle, H.-J., Agrarische Interessenpolitik und preussisches Konseruatismus im wilhelminischen Reich (1893–1914), Hannover, 1987.Google Scholar

9 Blackbourne, D. and Eley, G., The Peculiarities of German History, Bourgeois Society and Politics in Nineteenth-century Germany, Oxford, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10 Eley, G., Radical nationalism and political change after Bismarck, New Haven and London, 1980.Google Scholar

11 Becker, P.E., Zur Geschichte der Rassenhygiene. Wege ins Dritte Reich, Stuttgart, New York, 1988.Google Scholar

12 Weingart, P., ‘Eugenic Utopias–blueprints for the rationalization of human evolution’, Sociology of the Sciences (1984), pp. 173–187Google Scholar. Weingart, P., Kroll, J., Bayertz, K., Rasse, Blut und Gene. Geschichte der Eugenik und Rassenhygiene in Deutschland, Frankfurt am Main, 1988.Google Scholar

13 Roth, K.-H. (ed), Erfassung zur Vernichtung. Von der Sozialhygiene zum “Gesetz über Sterbehilfe”, Berlin, 1984.Google Scholar

14 Proctor, R.N., Racial Hygiene: Medicine under Nazis, Cambridge Mass., 1988.Google Scholar

15 Weingart, , Rasse, Blut and Gene, pp. 355–366.Google Scholar

16 Weindling, P.J., ‘Theories of the Cell State in Imperial Germany’, in Webster, C. (ed), Biology, Medicine and Society, Cambridge, 1981, pp. 99–155.Google Scholar

17 Weindling, P.J., Health, Race and German Politics between National Unification and Nazism, Cambridge, 1989.Google Scholar

18 weinberg, W., Die Kinder der Tuberkulösen, Leipzig, 1913.Google Scholar

19 For example, Fischer, E., Die Rehobother Bastards and die Bastardierungsproblem bei Menschen, Jena, 1913.Google Scholar

20 See Burchardt, L., Wissenschaftspolitik im Wilhelminischen Deutschland, Göttingen, 1975Google Scholar; Wendel, G., Die Kaiser Wilhelm Gesellschaft 1911–1914, Berlin, 1975.Google Scholar

21 Baur, E., Fischer, E. and Lenz, F., Grundriss der menschlichen Erblichkeitslehre and Rassenhygiene, Munich, 1921.Google Scholar

22 Baur, E., ‘Die biologische Bedeutung der Auswanderung für Deutschland’, Archiv für Frauenkunde und Eugenetik, (1921), VII, pp. 206–208.Google Scholar

23 Weindling, P.J., ‘Die Preussische Medizinalverwaltung und die “Rassenhygiene”’, in Thorn, A. and Spaar, H. (eds), Medizin und Faschismus, Berlin, 1983, pp. 23–35.Google Scholar

24 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Vererbungswissenschaft. Bericht über die sechste jahresversammlung in Hamburg (20 September 1928), Leipzig, 1929, pp. 108–118.Google Scholar

25 Max Planck Gesellschaft Library and Archive, Nachtsheim Papers, correspondence of Nachtsheim and Lenz 24.11.1945,11.8.1946, 21.8.1946, 28.12.1945, 3.7.1946, 2.1.1947, 2.9.1946,15.1.1947,14.1.1946, 25.7.1946. Also Lebenslauf 21.9.1945.

26 Compare Harwood, J., ‘The reception of Morgan's chromosome theory in Germany: interwar debate over cytoplasmic inheritance’, Medizinalhistorisches Journal, (1984), XIX, pp. 3–32.Google Scholar

27 Roth, K.-H. (ed), Erfassung zur Vernichtung, Berlin, 1984Google Scholar; Bock, G., Zwangssterilisation im National-sozialismus, Opladen, 1986.Google Scholar

28 Haecker, V., ‘Die Annahme einer erblichen Uebertragung körplicher Kriegsschäden’, Archiv für Frauenkunde, (1920), IV, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar

29 C. v. Pinnow, Behr, Die Zukunft der menschlichen Rasse. Grundtagen und Fordemngen der Vererbtingslehre, Berlin, 1925.Google Scholar

30 Zentrales Staatsarchiv, Merseburg, G.D.R. (ZSTA M) Rep 76, viil, No. 2001. Further documentation for the arguments below can be found in Weindling, P.J., Health, race and German politics, Cambridge, 1989.Google Scholar

31 Aly, G. and Roth, K.-H., Die restlose Erfassung, Volkszahlen, Idententifizieren, Aussondern im Nationalsozialismus, Berlin, 1984.Google Scholar

32 Weindling, P.J., ‘Weimar eugenics: The Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology. Human Heredity and eugenics in social context’, Annals of Science, (1985), XLII, pp. 277–301.Google Scholar

33 ZSTA, Potsdam, GDR, 15.01 No. 26234, Bl. 6–20.

34 ZSTA M Rep 1511C No. 9075, Bl. 152.

35 ZSTA M Rep viii B No. 2001.