Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T22:58:00.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Newtonian Time

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

Raymond Mercier
Affiliation:
University of Southampton

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Essay Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © British Society for the History of Science 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1 Newton, R. R., Ancient astronomical observations and the accelerations of the earth and moon, Baltimore, 1970Google Scholar; Medieval chronicles and the rotation of the earth, Baltimore, 1972.Google Scholar

2 van Flandern, T. C., ‘A determination of the rate of change of G’, Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 1975, 170, 333–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Morrison, L. V., ‘Rotation of the earth from AD 1663–1972 and the constancy of G’, Nature, 1973, 241, 519–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 op. cit. (2).

5 Muller, P. M. and Stephenson, F. R., ‘The accelerations of the earth and moon from early astronomical observations’, in Rosenberg, G. D. and Runcorn, S. K. (eds.) Growth rhythms and the history of the earth's rotation, London, 1975.Google Scholar

6 Newton, , op. cit. (1, 1970), p. 271.Google Scholar

7 Newton, , op. cit. (1, 1972), §xviii, 4.Google Scholar

8 Iounis, Ebn, Le livre de la grande table hakémite (tr. by Caussin de Perceval, J. J. A.), Paris, 1804, pp. 128–32.Google Scholar

9 Delambre, J. B. J., Histoire de l'astronomie ancienne, 2 vols., Paris, 1817, ii, 113.Google Scholar

10 Fotheringham, J. K., ‘The secular acceleration of the sun as determined from Hipparchus' equinox observations’, Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 1918, 78, 406–23 (419).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11 van der Waerden, B. L., ‘Klaudios Ptolemaios’, in Pauly-Kroll-Ziegler: Real-Enzyklopadie der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft, xxiii, col. 1788–1859 (1795).Google Scholar

12 Tuckerman, B., Planetary, lunar and solar positions 601 BC to AD 1, Memoirs of the American Philosophical Society, 1962, 56.Google Scholar

13 Newton, R. R., ‘The authenticity of Ptolemy's eclipse and star data’, Quarterly journal of Royal Astronomical Society, 1974, 15, 107–21.Google Scholar

14 Pannekoek, A., ‘Ptolemy's precession’, Vistas in astronomy, 1955, 1, 60–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15 The constant o. 1296 is retained from the standard Spencer Jones result. I am not sure as to the way in which this is altered by Muller and Stephenson.

16 Fotheringham, J. K. and Longbottom, Gertrude, ‘The secular acceleration of the moon's mean motion as determined from the occultations in the Almagest’, Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 1915, 75, 377–94 (378).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17 Mercier, R., ‘Studies in the medieval conception of precession’, Part II, Archive for history of exact sciences, 1977, 27, 3371 (50).Google Scholar