To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure firstname.lastname@example.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.
Find out more about sending to your Kindle.
Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account.
Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.
To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account.
Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.
1Madison, Paige, ‘The most brutal of human skulls: measuring and knowing the first Neanderthal’, BJHS (2016), this issue, pp. 411–432; Busk, George, ‘On the crania of the most ancient races of man, by Professor D. Schaaffhausen, of Bonn. With remarks, and original figures, taken from a cast of the Neanderthal cranium’, Natural History Review (1861) 1, pp. 155–176.
2Landau, Misia, Narratives of Human Evolution, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1991.
3Manias, Chris, ‘Sinanthropus in Britain: human origins and international science, 1920–1939’, BJHS (2015) 48(2), pp. 289–319; Goodrum, Matthew, ‘Crafting a new science: defining paleoanthropology and its relationship to prehistoric archaeology’, Isis (2014) 105, pp. 706–733; Goodrum, , ‘The history of human origins research and its place in the history of science: research problems and historiography’, History of Science (2009) 47, pp. 337–357; Corbey, Raymond and Roebroeks, Wil (eds.), Studying Human Origins: Disciplinary History and Epistemology, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2001; Golden, Murray, ‘Hobbits, hunters and hydrology: images of a “missing link” and its scientific communication’, Public Understanding of Science (2013) 22(50), pp. 575–589.
4Daniel, Glyn, The Idea of Prehistory, London: Penguin, 1962; Chippindale, Christopher, ‘The invention of words for the idea of “prehistory”’, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society (1988) 54, pp. 304–314; Clermont, Norman and Smith, Philip E.L., ‘Prehistoric, prehistory, prehistorian, who invented the terms’, Antiquity (1990) 64, pp. 97–102; Van Riper, A. Bowdoin, Men among the Mammoths: Victorian Science and the Discovery of Prehistory, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1993; Rowley-Conwy, Peter, ‘The concept of prehistory and the invention of the terms “prehistoric” and “prehistorian”: the Scandinavian origin, 1833–1850’, European Journal of Archaeology (2006) 9, 103–130; Goodrum, Matthew, ‘The idea of human prehistory: the natural sciences, the human sciences and the problem of human origins in Victorian Britain’, History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences (2012) 33, pp. 117–145.
5Clark, Constance A., God or Gorilla: Images of Evolution in the Jazz Age, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008; Clarke, , ‘“You are here”: missing links, chains of being and the language of cartoons’, Isis (2009) 100, pp. 571–589; Moser, Stephanie, Ancestral Image: The Iconography of Human Origins, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1998; Berman, Judith C., ‘Bad hair days in the Paleolithic: modern (re)constructions of the cave man’, American Anthropologist (1999) 101, pp. 288–304; McCown, Theodore D. and Kennedy, Kenneth A.R., Climbing Man's Family Tree: A Collection of Major Writings on Human Phylogeny, 1699–1971, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1972.
6de Bont, R., ‘The invention of prehistoric man: Aimé Rutot and the eoliths controversy, 1900–1920’, Isis (2003) 94, pp. 604–630; Spencer, Frank, ‘Prologue to a scientific forgery: the British eolithic movement from Abbeville to Piltdown’, in Stocking, George (ed.), Bones, Bodies, Behaviours: Essays in Behavioural Anthropology, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1990, pp. 84–116.
7Kjaergaard, Peter, ‘The fossil trade: paying a price for human origins, Isis (2012) 103, pp. 340–355; Goodrum, Matthew and Oleson, Cora, ‘The quest for absolute chronology in human prehistory: anthropologists, chemists and the fluorine dating method in palaeoanthropology, BJHS (2009) 42(1), pp. 95–114; Sommer, Marianne, Bones and Ochre: The Curious Afterlife of the Red Lady of Paviland, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008.
8Landau, Misia, ‘Human evolution as narrative’, American Scientist (1984) 72, pp. 262–268. See also Eldredge, Niles and Tattersall, Ian, The Myths of Human Evolution, New York: Columbia University Press, 1982; Bowler, Peter, Theories of Human Evolution: A Century of Debate, 1844–1944, Oxford: Blackwell, 1986.
9Ruddick, Nicholas, The Fire in the Stone: Prehistoric Fiction from Charles Darwin to Jean M. Auel, Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 2009; de Paolo, Charles, Human Prehistory in Fiction, Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Co., 2002; Sommer, Marianne, ‘The lost world as laboratory: the politics of evolution between science and fiction in early twentieth-century America’, Configurations (2007) 15(3), pp. 299–329.
10Bowler, Peter, ‘From “savage” to “primitive”: Victorian evolutionism and the interpretation of marginalised peoples’, Antiquity (1992) 66, pp. 721–729; Stephan, Nancy, The Idea of Race in Science: Great Britain 1800–1960, London: Macmillan, 1982; Stocking, George W., Victorian Anthropology, New York: The Free Press, 1987; Livingstone, David N., Adam's Ancestors: Race, Religion and the Politics of Human Origins, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008; Delisle, R.G., ‘Welcome to the twilight zone: a forgotten early phase of human evolutionary studies’, Endeavour (2012) 36(2), pp. 55–64; Gamble, Clive and Moutsiou, Theodora, ‘The time revolution of 1859 and the stratification of the primeval mind’, Notes and Records of the Royal Society (2011) 65, pp. 43–63; Pettit, Paul B. and White, Mark J., ‘Cave men: stone tools, Victorian science and the “primitive mind” of deep time’, Notes and Records of the Royal Society (2011) 65, pp. 25–42; Barany, Michael J., ‘Savage numbers and the evolution of civilisation in Victorian prehistory’, BJHS (2014) 47(2), pp. 239–255.
This special section was based on a workshop held at the University of York in September 2014 and funded by the British Academy through the Excavating Deep History: Historiography, Methodology and Narratives of Human Nature mid-career fellowship awarded to Amanda Rees for the 2013–2014 academic year. Their financial support is deeply appreciated and gratefully acknowledged. We would also like to acknowledge the important intellectual and critical contributions made by other participants in that workshop – in particular Chris Renwick, Penny Spikins, Jon Marks, Steve Fuller and Stuart Carroll – as well as the administrative support provided by Sarah Shrive-Morrison. Finally, our thanks to Charlotte Sleigh, Trish Hatton and two anonymous reviewers, for all the help they gave in seeing this project through from the first proposal to the appearance of this special section, and to Iwan Rhys Morus and Sam Robinson for criticizing this introduction.
Recommend this journal
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.