Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T04:40:30.763Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Trans and Non-Binary Healthcare QIP: Improving GPST Knowledge and Confidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2023

Mariana Vieira
Affiliation:
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
Olivia Barry
Affiliation:
Locum GP, Manchester, United Kingdom
Fiona Shaw*
Affiliation:
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Trans and non-binary people present with condition-specific health needs. General Practitioners (GPs) face increased demand to care for this population. The Royal College of General Practitioners note that “the gaps in education, guidance and training for GPs around treating gender dysphoria… and managing broader trans health issues… needs to be urgently addressed.” We are an interdisciplinary team using QI methodology to assess current self-reported knowledge and confidence amongst GP Specialty Trainees in the North-West of England (NWGPSTs) and deliver interventions targeting problem areas.

Methods

Following engagement with Health Education England North-West, a preliminary questionnaire was distributed to all NWGPSTs to assess baseline knowledge and confidence regarding gender-diverse peoples' healthcare.

Results were used to design a teaching session covering basic language and concepts; history and physical exam; gender affirming therapies; psychiatric, medical, and sexual health.

Teaching was delivered in a pilot scheme at four NWGPST training locations. Data were gathered before and after each session, with 3 additional questions to assess the quality of teaching and open-text feedback.

Results

In the preliminary questionnaire (n=150) the most common answer was the lowest amount of knowledge, confidence, or training (1 out of 6) for 11 out of 17 questions. Most reported no training during medical school or GP training programmes. Lack of knowledge in gender affirming therapies, fertility preservation, legal framework and referral pathways were identified.

Using a Likert scale (1 to 5), comparison between pre (n=61) and post-teaching (n=49) questionnaires showed improvement in knowledge in all areas (CI 95%). Overall knowledge improved with a mean of 1.05 (95% CI 0.72–1.38). Teaching quality feedback achieved a total mean score of 4.18. Open-text feedback was overwhelmingly positive about teaching material, enthusiasm of presenters, and contained useful suggestions for improvement.

Conclusion

Baseline knowledge of trans and non-binary healthcare is generally very low. A brief educational intervention made a statistically significant improvement to self-reported knowledge and confidence.

We have adapted the teaching based on participant feedback and with involvement from Experts by Experience and Experts by Training. We have enriched teaching with video submissions from Experts by Experience. We have continued to engage with stakeholders, including partners at The LGBT Foundation and Indigo (GP-based Manchester gender service). To grow further, we have trained a faculty of 10 GPSTs to provide teaching, with 11 sessions now delivered to over 300 GPSTs and 5 sessions upcoming. We are planning a nationwide virtual training day.

Type
Quality Improvement
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.