Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T23:10:06.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Multimorbidity and Polypharmacy in Psychosis: Identifying Potentially Significant Drug Interactions in an Old Age Inpatient Psychiatry Setting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2023

Abhinav Tewari*
Affiliation:
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Grays, Thurrock, United Kingdom
Ashish Pathak
Affiliation:
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Basildon, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

To determine potentially significant drug interactions in an old age setting among inpatients with psychosis and medical comorbidities over the past 12 months

Methods

Study setting: old age inpatient functional ward

Sample size: 11

Inclusion criteria:

  • Inpatients on psychotropic medications with diagnosis ranging from F20 to F29 (ICD-10)

  • Comorbid chronic medical condition(s) requiring long term drug treatment

Exclusion criteria:

  • Patients with other/co-existing mental health diagnosis excluded

  • Antibiotics , OTC medications, herbal treatments, emergency treatments and other medications requiring short-term administration excluded from analysis

Study tools:

  • Lexicomp® interaction checker

    • Category X: Avoid combination

    • Category D: Consider therapy modification

    • Further categories (In order of decreasing risk ratings: C, B, A) excluded from the analysis

Results

Out of the total 67 inpatients admitted between January 2022 and December 2022, 17 patients had diagnosis ranging between F20 and F29. 4 patients were excluded due to no medical comorbidities and 2 were excluded due to lack of data. Among the 11 patients included in the analysis, the most common medical comorbidities were, in decreasing order, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia and chronic pain. A total of 114 interactions were noted between psychotropic medications and other physical health medications, as follows:

No significant interactions: (category A, B, C): 103

Category D (consider therapy modification): 10

  • 7 of these interactions were associated with administering Buprenorphine with other medications (Flupentixol, Gabapentin, Nortriptyline, Olanzapine, Amisulpride, Aripiprazole and Pregabalin) leading to additive CNS depressant effects.

  • Interaction of codeine with Valproate and Flupentixol carried risk of CNS depression.

  • Carbamazepine interacted with Risperidone via CYP enzyme induction.

Category X (avoid combination): 1

  • The interaction between Flupentixol and Glycopyrronium was associated with risk of severe anticholinergic effects

Conclusion

This study is a preliminary investigation towards understanding the drug interactions in a population with long term mental health and physical health ailments. Awareness regarding the potential interactions can help avoid combinations with possible detrimental effects. The limitations of this study, in terms of sample size and quality of available data, can be overcome by conducting a planned study on a larger population.

Financial Sponsorship: none

Conflict of interests: none

Type
Psychopharmacology
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.