No CrossRef data available.
Improving Screening and Standardising Interventions for Patients With Above Normal Body Mass Index (BMI) Admitted to a Male Psychiatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU): A Quality Improvement Project
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 July 2023
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims/hypothesis
1. To increase the proportion of patients having their BMI documented on admission to the PICU.
2. To improve rates of standardised interventions when abnormalities in BMI found.
Among patients admitted to PICU, there is lack of consistency in monitoring of BMI and in offering interventions for those with abnormal BMI. We expect an improvement in both the parameter with the quality improvement project. Background: Service users admitted to PICU have severe mental health illnesses, and are known to have several high risk cardiometabolic parameters including excessive weight. In addition, they are often treated with medications known to cause weight gain. Without effective management, this is likely to cause increased morbidity and mortality
Methods
Initial baseline data were collected by reviewing patient notes.
We then tested interventions to improve weight and BMI screening process on the PICU. We used the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) methodology over 2 cycles. In the first cycle, we engaged the nursing staff to improve screening on admission, including training to overcome the glitch in the electronic form that prevented automatic BMI calculation. In the second cycle, we introduced a protocol to ensure consistent interventions were offered to patients with abnormal BMI. The interventions offered were referral to dietician, referral to PICU gym instructor and MDT discussion about lifestyle changes and medication to manage weight.
Data were collected after each PDSA cycle to monitor change.
Results
Baseline: 47% of PICU patients had their BMIs recorded on admission. 69% of those patients that met the overweight criteria were offered an intervention.
After the first PDSA cycle, 91% of patients had their BMIs recorded. 71% of those patients that met the overweight criteria were offered an intervention.
After the second PDSA cycle, all the consenting patients had their BMIs recorded. 100% of those patients that met the overweight criteria were offered all the interventions in the protocol but not all agreed to engage with the interventions.
Conclusion
As a result of this quality improvement project there has been an improvement in screening for BMI on admission to PICU and in the standardised interventions offered to those with high BMI. The next steps will be to implement this across the other wards and to improve patients’ engagement with the interventions.
- Type
- Quality Improvement
- Information
- BJPsych Open , Volume 9 , Supplement S1: Abstracts from the RCPsych International Congress 2023, 10–13 July , July 2023 , pp. S108
- Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists
Footnotes
Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.
You have
Access
Open access
eLetters
No eLetters have been published for this article.