Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-18T01:23:33.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Implementing ‘Train 2 Retain’ Simulation Training Programme for the Mental Health Liaison Practitioners: A 6 Month Pilot Project

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2023

Qaiser Javed*
Affiliation:
Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
Sruthi Easwaran
Affiliation:
Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
Aamer Shamim
Affiliation:
Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

The authors designed a unique simulation training programme exclusively for the liaison practitioners based in Aintree University Hospital Mental Health Liaison Team (MHLT). The simulation training aimed to improve the knowledge, confidence and competence of liaison practitioners through exposing them to realistic mental health related scenarios in an Accident and Emergency department (AED) and teaching them clinical skills in a safe environment.

Methods

The programme had been delivered by a Liaison Psychiatrist, core and higher trainees in once-monthly session lasting 45 minutes. Six clinical scenarios were picked based on the most common AED presentations. Scripts for all six scenarios were prepared in advance and both content and quality were checked with a liaison consultant psychiatrist. The scenarios depicted the journey of a patient being referred by the AED doctor to MHLT. Various clinical skills were embedded in the training programme including history taking, risk assessment, eliciting psychopathology, brief physical examination, managing co-morbid physical and mental health conditions, use of Mental capacity and Mental Health Act, and collaborative working with AED colleagues. Each station lasted 10-15 minutes and was accompanied by pre-briefing and debriefing with a higher trainee and experienced liaison psychiatrist for a further 30 minutes.

Liaison practitioners rated their confidence managing common but complex scenarios on Likert scales from 1 to 5 immediately before and after the session. Free-text questions explored practitioner's favourite aspects of the training, areas of further improvement and topics they would like the authors to include in the future training. Feedback had guided subsequent programme development and topic selection.

Results

The strength of the target audience was between 6 and 15 nurses per session, with increasing attendance at each session. Dropouts were mainly related to their busy shifts in AED. On average, Likert scale scores were between 1-2 before and 5 after sessions (100% in all feedback forms), indicating a statistically significant improvement in overall confidence and competence. Participants highlighted the format, real-life performance, quality of clinical scenarios and power point slides including group discussions as the most useful aspects of the training. 100% of respondents felt that the content covered was useful and the session content was pitched at the appropriate level.

Conclusion

Overall, 'Train 2 Retain' Simulation training was well-received amongst liaison practitioners. Embedding simulation training can improve the confidence and skills of liaison practitioners working in a busy AED setting which will improve well-being and staff retention. The next phase in the development of the training will be to include competence-based assessment and involving practitioners from other liaison services within the trust.

Type
Quality Improvement
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.