Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T12:49:15.199Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Are medications with anti-cholinergic properties prescribed and reviewed appropriately on a male older person's organic ward?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2021

Ben Greenhalgh*
Affiliation:
Monkwearmouth Hospital, Sunderland, Cumbria, Northumberland Tyne Wear NHS Foundation Trust
Hina Anwar
Affiliation:
Monkwearmouth Hospital, Sunderland, Cumbria, Northumberland Tyne Wear NHS Foundation Trust
Rosemary Hedley
Affiliation:
Monkwearmouth Hospital, Sunderland, Cumbria, Northumberland Tyne Wear NHS Foundation Trust
Celine Perkins
Affiliation:
Monkwearmouth Hospital, Sunderland, Cumbria, Northumberland Tyne Wear NHS Foundation Trust
Rachel Shaw
Affiliation:
Monkwearmouth Hospital, Sunderland, Cumbria, Northumberland Tyne Wear NHS Foundation Trust
*
*corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims

Patients admitted to Roker ward (male organic psychiatric ward) should have a decreased anticholinergic burden of medication on discharge compared to admission. This will be demonstrated by a reduced score on the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden (ACB) scale on discharge compared to admission. Target: 80%.

Where new medicines with anticholinergic burden are prescribed during admission, there should be evidence that the anticholinergic properties of these medications have been considered prior to prescribing (via documentation in care co-ordination reviews or progress notes). Target: 100%

Method

Electronic records were searched for all discharges from Roker ward between 1/1/2019 – 31/12/2019. For each record the follwing information was recorded: demographics; primary diagnosis; total ACB score on admission; and total ACB score on discharge. For all new medications started with an ACB score of over zero, records were searched to establish whether there was evidence that the anticholinergic properties of these medications had been considered.

Result

47 patients were identified who were discharged over the time period in question. 30 patients had no difference in ACB score between admission and discharge; 10 patients had a reduction in ACB score and 5 patients had an increase. A total of 9 new medications with ACB scores over zero had been started during all admissions; there were no occasions where there was documented evidence to show that the anticholinergic burden of these medications had been considered.

Conclusion

27% of patients had a reduction in their total ACB score during admission; the target was 80%.

The reasons for starting medications with an ACB score of greater than 1 were documented in 0% of cases; the target was 100%.

As both targets were missed by a significant margin, it was recognised that there were significant areas for improvement. The following plan was therefore implemented:

  1. 1. Following discussion with the ward consultant and ward pharmacist, regular prescriber meetings have been set up which involve senior nursing staff, medical staff and pharmacy – anticholinergic burden is calculated for each patient as part of these meetings

  2. 2. A re-audit is recommended after 6 months.

Type
Audit
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.