Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-18T03:03:48.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The evolution and future of eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing therapy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 June 2024

Paul W. Miller*
Affiliation:
Visiting professor in the School of Nursing, Faculty of Life and Health Sciences, Ulster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland, and a consultant psychiatrist, clinical lead and accredited eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR) trainer at the Mirabilis Health Institute, Newtonabbey, Northern Ireland, UK. He is also an honorary professor at Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, Kharkiv, Ukraine.
*
Correspondence Paul W. Miller. Email: nemojanus@me.com

Summary

Eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR), a therapy initially developed by Dr Francine Shapiro for treating post-traumatic stress disorder, has broadened its scope to include other forms of stress and trauma, even showing promise for physical health conditions. This commentary on a series of three articles on EMDR in this journal outlines the therapy's underlying theoretical model, adaptive information processing (AIP), which involves trauma-focused case conceptualisation. It also introduces the work of the EMDR Council of Scholars, which identified three categories of treatment: EMDR psychotherapy, EMDR treatment protocols and EMDR-derived techniques. Finally, it considers EMDR training and credentialing and the aim of current leaders in the EMDR community to solidify EMDR's standing as a scientifically validated, front-line trauma therapy, while honouring Shapiro's legacy of striving to end the cycle of violence, especially in low- and middle-income countries.

Type
Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Commentary on… Eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing (parts 1–3). See this issue.

References

Allsopp, K, Read, J, Corcoran, R, et al (2019) Heterogeneity in psychiatric diagnostic classification. Psychiatry Research, 279: 1522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carvalho, ER, Hoersting, RC (2023) The TraumaClinic model of EMDR basic training in Brazil: a country case study for in-person and online training. Journal of EMDR Practice and Research, 17: 33–7.Google Scholar
de Jongh, A, de Roos, C, El-Leithy, S (2024) State of the science: eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 37: 205–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dworkin, M (2005) EMDR and the Relational Imperative: The Therapeutic Relationship in EMDR Treatment. Routledge.Google Scholar
Farrell, D, Kiernan, MD, de Jongh, A, et al (2020) Treating implicit trauma: a quasi-experimental study comparing the EMDR Therapy Standard Protocol with a ‘Blind 2 Therapist’ version within a trauma capacity building project in Northern Iraq. Journal of International Humanitarian Action, 5(1): 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies (2019) Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Prevention and Treatment Guidelines: Methodology and Recommendations. ISTSS.Google Scholar
Javinsky, T-R, Udo, I, Awani, T (2022) Eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing: part 2 – wider use in stress and trauma conditions. BJPsych Advances [Epub ahead of print] 27 Jun. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1192/bja.2022.31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laliotis, D, Luber, M, Oren, U, et al (2021) What is EMDR therapy? Past, present, and future directions. Journal of EMDR Practice and Research, 15: 186201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCulloch, MJ, Feldman, P (1996) Eye movement desensitisation treatment utilises the positive visceral element of the investigatory reflex to inhibit the memories of post-traumatic stress disorder: a theoretical analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 169: 571–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matthijssen, SJMA, Brouwers, T, van Roozendaal, C, et al (2021) The effect of EMDR versus EMDR 2.0 on emotionality and vividness of aversive memories in a non-clinical sample. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 12(1): 1956793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, PW, McGowan, IW, Bergmann, U, et al (2018) Stochastic resonance as a proposed neurobiological model for Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) therapy. Medical Hypotheses, 121: 106–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pagani, M, Amann, BL, Landin-Romero, R, et al (2017) Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing and slow wave sleep: a putative mechanism of action. Frontiers in Psychology, 8: 1935.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ross, CA, Keyes, BB, Yan, H, et al (2008) A cross-cultural test of the trauma model of dissociation. Journal of Trauma and Dissociation, 9: 3549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shapiro, F (1989) Eye movement desensitization: a new treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 20: 211–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solomon, RM, Shapiro, F (2008) EMDR and the adaptive information processing model. Journal of EMDR Practice and Research, 2: 315–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spandler, H (2006) Asylum to Action: Paddington Day Hospital, Therapeutic Communities, and Beyond. Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
Stickgold, R (2002) EMDR: a putative neurobiological mechanism of action. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58: 6175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Udo, I, Javinsky, T-R, Awani, T (2022) Eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing: part 1 – theory, procedure and use in PTSD. BJPsych Advances [Epub ahead of print] 27 Jun. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1192/bja.2022.32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Udo, I, Javinsky, T-R, McDaniel, C (2023) Eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing: part 3 – applications in physical health conditions. BJPsych Advances [Epub ahead of print] 19 Jul. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1192/bja.2023.32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.