Article contents
Why biological neuroscience cannot replace psychology
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 October 1999
Abstract
Gold & Stoljar argue persuasively that there is presently not a good case for the “radical neuron doctrine.” There are strong reasons to believe that this doctrine is false. An analogy between psychology and economics strongly throws the radical neuron doctrine into doubt.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- © 1999 Cambridge University Press
- 1
- Cited by