Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T14:40:57.069Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why a group-level analysis is essential for effective public policy: The case for a g-frame

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2023

William J. Bingley Open the ORCID record for William J. Bingley [Opens in a new window] ,
S. Alexander Haslam ,
Catherine Haslam ,
Matthew J. Hornsey  and
Frank Mols
William J. Bingley
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia. w.bingley@uq.edu.au a.haslam@uq.edu.au c.haslam@uq.edu.au
S. Alexander Haslam
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia. w.bingley@uq.edu.au a.haslam@uq.edu.au c.haslam@uq.edu.au
Catherine Haslam
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia. w.bingley@uq.edu.au a.haslam@uq.edu.au c.haslam@uq.edu.au
Matthew J. Hornsey
Affiliation:
School of Business, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia. m.hornsey@business.uq.edu.au
Frank Mols
Affiliation:
School of Political Science and International Studies, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia. f.mols@uq.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Societal problems are not solved by individualistic interventions, but nor are systemic approaches optimal given their neglect of the social psychology underpinning group dynamics. This impasse can be addressed through a group-level analysis (a “g-frame”) that social identity theorizing affords. Using a g-frame can make policy interventions more adaptive, inclusive, and engaging.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e148
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Drury, J., & Reicher, S. (2009). Collective psychological empowerment as a model of social change: Researching crowds and power. Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 707–725. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01622.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fekete, L. (2004). Anti-Muslim racism and the European security state. Race & Class, 46(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306396804045512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslam, C., Jetten, J., Cruwys, T., Dingle, G. A., & Haslam, S. A. (2018). The new psychology of health: Unlocking the social cure. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315648569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslam, S. A., & Reicher, S. D. (2012). When prisoners take over the prison: A social psychology of resistance. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(2), 154–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311419864CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hornsey, M. J. (2020). Conspiracy theories. In Jetten, J., Reicher, S. D., Haslam, S. A., & Cruwys, T. (Eds.), Together apart: The psychology of COVID-19 (pp. 41–46). Sage.Google Scholar
Levine-Rasky, C., Beaudoin, J., & St Clair, P. (2014). The exclusion of Roma claimants in Canadian refugee policy. Patterns of Prejudice, 48(1), 67–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/0031322X.2013.857477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masson, T., & Fritsche, I. (2021). We need climate change mitigation and climate change mitigation needs the “We”: A state-of-the-art review of social identity effects motivating climate change action. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 42, 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.04.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merino-Pérez, L., & Segura-Warnholtz, G. (2021). Forest and conservation policies and their impact on forest communities in Mexico. In Bray, D. B., Merino-Pérez, L., & Barry, D. (Eds.), The community forests of Mexico (pp. 49–70). University of Texas Press. https://doi.org/10.7560/706378-005Google Scholar
Mols, F., Haslam, S. A., Jetten, J., & Steffens, N. K. (2015). Why a nudge is not enough: A social identity critique of governance by stealth. European Journal of Political Research, 54(1), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Mara, P. (2010). Health impacts of the Northern Territory intervention. Medical Journal of Australia, 192(10), 546–548. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03631.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reicher, S., & Stott, C. (2020). On order and disorder during the COVID-19 pandemic. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(3), 694–702. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12398CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Austin, W. G. & Worchel, S. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–37). Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Turner, J. C. (2005). Explaining the nature of power: A three-process theory. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & McGarty, C. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 454–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294205002CrossRefGoogle Scholar